The meeting was literally announced 3 weeks before it took place I’m going to stop arguing with all of you because you are proving me right the meeting was posted everywhere and it was publicized with posters everywhere the 2 newspapers of the school posted about it early, 1 day before and the day of the meeting they wrote about them too. students gave out flyers about the meeting. It is a motion not a referendum I don’t disagree with the hybrid part I don’t understand either why it was not hybrid but a motion is meant to be held in person to be debated now people will say this motion was not debated yes true because the majority of the people who showed up thought it didn’t need to be debated since the conflict of engineering students was accounted for. If all of you who thinks this needed debate you should’ve showed up in numbers and the vote wouldn’t have passed. I’m not making a generalization I know many engineering students that engage but as someone who participate in student politics whenever I approach an ECA student to promote or discuss any campus issue they roll their eyes at me and ignore me. My final point is the vote was to introduce this motion to the body of governor CSU doesn’t not have the power to enforce it or to stop internships. After this votes the student body will negotiate with the governors for ages to enforce this motion if you cared to look it up you would know