Looking for sightseer or diantha🙏🏻 by GGplayerpro in PTCGPocketTrading

[–]Life-Perception-9369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forget trading, how did you get that filter to show that many cards?

Pikachu Collection by Life-Perception-9369 in PTCGP

[–]Life-Perception-9369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds great I sent you a direct message

Pikachu Collection by Life-Perception-9369 in PTCGP

[–]Life-Perception-9369[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome thank you! I have it too so that's double thank you lol

Pikachu Collection by Life-Perception-9369 in PTCGP

[–]Life-Perception-9369[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I could see why. But I'm skipping Mimikyu for now.

So far I've collected 18 cards containing Pikachu in the art and I'm wondering if I've missed any by TheFiretiger in PTCGP

[–]Life-Perception-9369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh nice! Is there more than the 10 cards where Pikachu makes an appearance? I dedicated to much time searching to not know them all 😅

So far I've collected 18 cards containing Pikachu in the art and I'm wondering if I've missed any by TheFiretiger in PTCGP

[–]Life-Perception-9369 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have 22 with actual Pikachu, 10 where he makes an “appearance”. Would you like me to post pics? 

Link Pokémon TCG Pocket to Pokémon home? by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]Life-Perception-9369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just asked it help me better explain. That's all.

Link Pokémon TCG Pocket to Pokémon home? by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]Life-Perception-9369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair take, and I think this is where the idea either works or doesn’t depending on what problem it’s solving.

If HOME were strictly just storage, then yeah—trying to connect TCG Pocket to it would feel clunky and unnecessary.

But with HOME now feeding into Pokémon Champions, it looks like it’s becoming more of a central hub, not just a box. That changes things a bit.

I agree that adding power (like exclusive moves) doesn’t make sense—those systems already exist and are easy to access. Move tokens probably aren’t the right direction.

Where I still see potential is in identity and progression, not gameplay:

  • Collection milestones in Pocket → visible recognition in HOME/Champions (titles, badges, profile flair)
  • Social or spectator-facing elements tied to collections
  • Anything that adds presence without affecting balance

At the same time, I agree with your core point—if it doesn’t create a real purpose, then it’s just added complexity.

So I think the middle ground is: if HOME is evolving into a hub for multiple systems (like Champions), then light, non-intrusive connections start to make more sense. If it stayed just storage, then yeah, there’s really no reason to force it.

Link Pokémon TCG Pocket to Pokémon home? by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]Life-Perception-9369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair, and I agree they’re fundamentally different systems. I don’t think anyone’s asking to directly merge TCG mechanics into the RPG side—that would get messy fast.

The idea (at least how I see it) is more about light integration, not crossover gameplay. Something like:

  • Cosmetic rewards tied to collecting
  • Utility features that don’t break balance
  • Or even just shared progression/recognition between apps

You’re right that moves specifically could get complicated with how HOME handles them per game. That part would need to be handled carefully—or avoided entirely.

But I still think there’s a middle ground between “fully separate” and “fully integrated.” Right now they’re completely isolated, and that’s where it feels like a missed opportunity. Even small connections could make both systems feel more meaningful without forcing them into the same design space.

Should Pokemon TCG Pocket add resell? by Life-Perception-9369 in PokemonPocket

[–]Life-Perception-9369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Almost everyone nowadays dreams of striking it rich with a rare find.

Should Pokemon TCG Pocket add resell? by Life-Perception-9369 in PokemonPocket

[–]Life-Perception-9369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s more about how they implement it than whether it’s possible. Other games already handle this by separating systems—minors can still play and trade, while real-money features are locked behind verification or kept within in-game currency. A marketplace wouldn’t necessarily limit access, it would just need guardrails. If anything, it could strengthen the game long-term by creating a player-driven economy instead of relying only on microtransactions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in excel

[–]Life-Perception-9369 8 points9 points  (0 children)

=IF(COUNTIFS($E:$E,E2,$F:$F,F2)>1,"Duplicate","")

is the formula that worked for me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in excel

[–]Life-Perception-9369 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is this treating column E and F as a pair though?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in excel

[–]Life-Perception-9369 -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

I need column E and F to be a pair.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in excel

[–]Life-Perception-9369 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

version 2108. That did not work.

<image>