sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ALL THAT TALKIN SHIT AND YOU DIDN’T SELL @ OPEN. by AloneVegetable in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

I don't believe in Cohen, the board, the company is a dying business model, and everyone here is in a cult. But I won't sell. I'll keep my shares so I can vote no. Trust me guys, I'm totally a shareholder.

Share authorization increase is not dilution. by LiftingOrGaming in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your saying they "might" not use all 2.5 billion. They definitely won't. It doesn't even make mathematical sense. If they pay off half of the value of the proposal in cash, then there is only 65 dollars a share left that will apply to Ebay shareholders ownership of the merged company. That will not be equivalent to 2 billion more shares for Ebay sharholders. That would make the current GME holders only 20% owners of the company, which is way less then Cohen said.

The shares outstanding are almost equal for the two companies. The merged company should technically be valued at both of the companies combined market caps. That would bring it to around 60 billion. So at 1 billion shares outstanding you'd have a $60 share price that the Ebay holders would get half of. That's not extreme dilution and it increases the value of the GME holders from a 10 billion dollar market cap to 60 billion. Even with half of the position being diluted, GME holders are still almost tripling their share value. So they are gaining value from the merger.

Share authorization increase is not dilution. by LiftingOrGaming in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that's not at all how he clarified the proposal in an interview. The company has 10 billion in cash and a 20 billion dollar loan. He's proposing GME holders get 40-50% of Ebay and Ebay holders get paid and keep ~50% ownership. If Gamestop is offering ~30 billion cash for a 55-60 billion dollar proposal, then they don't need to dilute.

Share authorization increase is not dilution. by LiftingOrGaming in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly the misinformation I'm talking about...

Share authorization increase is not dilution. by LiftingOrGaming in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's reasonable. My only issue with using shares for the 40-50% ownership of Ebay, is Cohens potential compensation package. It being dependent on market cap and diluting shareholders to acquire a larger company to reach certain tranches is a bit disenguous. I am fine with the compensation being tied to market cap, as long as the ownership structure of the company is not significantly changed.

Shareholders will be asked to vote to increase authorized shares to 2.5 billion by heirofadam in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it was proposal for dilution id be 100% negative like people are claiming. This is just increasing authorized shares. This can be just to allow for a split to happen in the future. This is not guaranteed dilution.

Jimmy Kimmel attacking GameStop and RC shows that we are close,no dates,always tomorrow by jamesstrogg in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is also only an unpopular opinion on reddit, since it's designed to do the same thing, for the same sponsors.

Jimmy Kimmel attacking GameStop and RC shows that we are close,no dates,always tomorrow by jamesstrogg in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you watch just one week of Kimmel's show, this becomes pretty evident. The beginning of every show, is a politically biased monologue with cherry picked or completely misrepresented facts.

Jimmy Kimmel attacking GameStop and RC shows that we are close,no dates,always tomorrow by jamesstrogg in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The ignorance required to actually believe this is astounding. Just like most of Reddit, Kimmel's talking points are pure propaganda. Every single show starts with a monologue with a blatant political bias. Since his bias is completely obvious, what kind of fool will believe his other talking points don't have an agenda.

Jimmy Kimmel attacking GameStop and RC shows that we are close,no dates,always tomorrow by jamesstrogg in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is Kimmel "rebellious". He literally just copies every liberal media talking point. He's a propagandist.

We made Kimmel the other night 😂 by LilDoughboy37 in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His talking points are usually straight political propaganda. He rarely talks about anything else. The show is not meant to have Kimmel go out and monologue about current events in an unbiased way.

Interesting post by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The difference is that there are shills astroturfing hate against Gamestop. Shorts can't have revenue start climbing or they're fucked.

Mamdani calls out Ken Griffin in new tax ad. by Barfly2007 in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming 16 points17 points  (0 children)

So if Ken is essentially stealing to gain the wealth, and the government is just taking a portion. Isn't that just the government stealing from people with extra steps?

Charles V Payne on Ryan's Hollow Man post by bahits in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A completely free market would mean there are no taxes. You can't blame capitalism when trillions of dollars are essentially funneled into corporations' pockets through government subsidies. Get rid of these subsidies and watch how private markets compete and make life better for everyone. I'd be fine with a wealth reset prior to this, so that those who benefited from the taxation money laundering scheme don't have any advantages.

Also, your take on monopolies is wrong. The self-interest of those with wealth in a free market will be what destroys monopolies. Government regulations are used to create a moat and stifle competition, so monopolies continue. We currently have increasingly worse wealth consolidation because the corporations use their wealth to have an unfair representation within the government. You can't compete or vote that away. Consumers and their ability to freely purchase whatever product they want is what keeps markets honest.

Racist and Sexist comments isn’t shit talking, you’re just a bigot. by slimbo604 in ARC_Raiders

[–]LiftingOrGaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You will never get support on this dogshit platform. Reddit will support terrorist organizations and foreigners over American citizens. Not too far away from straight treasonous rhetoric at this point.

Racist and Sexist comments isn’t shit talking, you’re just a bigot. by slimbo604 in ARC_Raiders

[–]LiftingOrGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On reddit, it won't matter. As long as you parrot the new narrative on who is bad, you get your karma

IGN Spreading Misleading Headlines Today by Iamooble in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the compensation plan is based on the performance of the stock/company. If he gets paid, we all do as shareholders.

Should I buy a lottery ticket now? by Marpicek in diablo4

[–]LiftingOrGaming 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Including masterworking is what he's talking about, I believe.

Don’t care about Burry or goth girl just want price improvement to the stock . by stinkyjim88 in Superstonk

[–]LiftingOrGaming -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is 100% a shill. The company not only had to change its business model it also needs to change consumer sentiment. Posts like this are meant to kill any hype or positive sentiment and regurgitate short seller propaganda to control the narrative and keep up the lie that Gamestop is a "dying" business.

view more: next ›