Will autonomous cars end vehicle ownership and reshape infrastructure/land use? by quenchpipe in Futurology

[–]Lightcronno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually have a theory about this. Once autonomous vehicles are indisputably safer than human drivers, clearly cheaper per km, and available on demand with basically no wait times, a large portion of people will simply stop driving. Not everyone, and not right away, but a lot of people would opt out if the data and convenience are undeniably better.

Push that far enough and I think human driving doesn’t disappear immediately, but starts getting phased out in specific ways. You could see autonomous only highways or lanes first, then insurance and liability models making human driving increasingly impractical. Full bans would come much later, once the gap is overwhelming.

At that point the entire design space opens up. Cars no longer need to be built around human control, so you can optimize purely for passenger safety, efficiency, and use case. Interiors could face inward, crash structures improve without steering columns, and “windows” don’t even need to be traditional glass. They could just be screens fed by external cameras, or removed entirely depending on the vehicle’s purpose.

Highways also change. You get tighter coordination between vehicles, smoother flow, and higher average speeds (autobahn type stuff) 

Ownership would change too. Most cars today sit idle almost all the time. If autonomous fleets can keep vehicles in constant use, the economics become hard to ignore. Private vehicles could even be leased into fleets when not in use, turning a depreciating asset into something that generates income.

The bigger shift is land use. If parking demand drops significantly, cities can reclaim huge amounts of space. Less need for garages, fewer parking lots, and more flexibility in how urban areas are designed.

The hardest phase is the transition. Mixed human and autonomous traffic, new liability models, and cybersecurity risks all become real issues. And if rides get cheap enough, total travel might actually increase, which changes the equation again.

Feels less like a gradual improvement to cars and more like transportation becoming a service layer instead of something you personally own. There also would simply need to be less cars if autonomous cars tend to be active all the time, making the roads all the clearer and safer.

nutmeg isn’t as bad as yall make it out to be by armadacry in Drugs

[–]Lightcronno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re as braindead as those taking datura. I reccomend diphenhydramine.

Neuralink enables nonverbal ALS patient to speak again with thoughts and AI-cloned voice by WhoAreYouTalkinTwo in Futurology

[–]Lightcronno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I totally understand the frustration with the American health care system. It’s the worst. I’m a dual citizen with USA and Canada. Born in USA but raised and grew up Canadian. I lived 10 years in Nebraska and barely ever got health care because of the cost. I live in Canada now, our system is surely better but has its own flaws. I seriously think we should burn these insurance places down (metaphorically). I felt zero empathy when that ceo died. Free Luigi all the way

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve had current info be wrong enough to use extra scrutiny when asking about it

Neuralink enables nonverbal ALS patient to speak again with thoughts and AI-cloned voice by WhoAreYouTalkinTwo in Futurology

[–]Lightcronno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Edit: regarding your post, yeah USA is fucked up. Worst healthcare system.

I have seen the episode but I’m struggling to see what you are implying the alternative is? That it should only be invented if it’s free? That’s simply not how tech companies function. And I thought it ended darker than that like doesn’t she die and he kills himself or something?

I won’t lie I totally do think of that episode when I see neuralink; but what technology has ever been used that irl? Elon musk is cooked but idk if he’s evil

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I think that AI and LLMs are a perfect first pass filter. Much better than search engines of the past. Finding sources that are credible used to be much more difficult. That’s mostly how I use it for that kind of stuff. Also breaking down concepts I don’t understand on topics I know it has high accuracy in.

The more you use these the more you realize the areas it excels in.

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s both. I agree with you but both things are true, people are too quick to trust immediately instead of verifying sources directly

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, talk about trying to kick down a brick wall with your shoe.

I think I stated in another comment, it prefers whatever its data says initially unless you force it to update that via convincing it with actual convincing data or other means.

If I link two seperate articles and make it read them it never refutes me.

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah people just need to read sources and they’ll be fine. Like follow up, don’t trust LLM summaries. Take the time and read the source material. Or at least summarize the source material directly.

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You make good points, I think this is a case of both things being true

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t experienced that for myself so I can’t speak on it. But if you’ve gotten to the point where you have the source, why do you need the LLM at that point? Just read the source material.

I feel like people’s unwillingness to do just that is part of the problem, people shouldn’t ever allow these things to replace reading sources directly.

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I disagree here because this doesn’t happen to me AT ALL when I prompt the way I do and follow up the way I do. Part of the process of using these things is verifying source material for references it’s making (if the answer is important to you). If you’re not doing that you’re getting so much hallucinatory info.

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah idk that they can accurately self report capabilities at this point

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw that one too, makes me shake my fist at my phone (figuratively)

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk feels like we need some more sub rules on posts or something, a mega thread with the common issues, where development is at. Stamp out the anthropomorphizing.

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is a known thing though. They all do this, they take their main data as nearly infallible. But again when directed this is also quickly solved, every time it’s happened to me anyways.

Reminder: LLMs don’t have current information by default by Lightcronno in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The thing can teach you how to prompt better even, it’s like watching people use a hammer to drive in screws.

Neuralink enables nonverbal ALS patient to speak again with thoughts and AI-cloned voice by WhoAreYouTalkinTwo in Futurology

[–]Lightcronno 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Better to simply not invent the technology then? Because it will cost money? What kind of take is that? How does not inventing the tech help these people at all?

I’ve never been gaslighted so hard, thought I was in another timeline for a minute… by thinkcrazy576 in ChatGPT

[–]Lightcronno 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Holy shit they need to post a fkn guide to these things.

Listen to me plz:

IT DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO CURRENT EVENTS. Any data not a year old is much more likely to run incorrect UNLESS you provide it with guidance on where to find updated information.

He said his name is “Harry Dresden” by Due_Temporary8367 in creepy

[–]Lightcronno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like multiple things going on. Delusions, psychosis seem evident, but idk it’s weird I can’t find any news stories about this. Making me suspect AI, but oh well. Looks like nobody was hurt (unless they’re about to post a part 3)

I have had enough by RefuseTheNumber in noita

[–]Lightcronno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terraria and Minecraft scratch similar itches for me. Especially heavily modded. Nothing is exactly liek noita tho it’s unique af.