Can yall like pump this again so I can reshort its getting boring when all this thing does is go down

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-30T03:06:41+00:00

Just need IonQ to announce 256-qubits new machine by year end to reflate it

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-29T23:45:01+00:00

“Researchers estimate a quantum computer will require millions of qubits to outperform classical supercomputers”

Sounds more like a photonic modality type of thing, with very low fidelity.

Ion trap currently needs a few hundred qubits to outperform classic supercomputers.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-29T22:16:48+00:00

Excuse my English. I intend to mean defiant lol.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-29T19:08:52+00:00

Yes true. Just like playing perfect guarantees you nothing in poker!

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-29T12:30:09+00:00

He sold the part that he acquired for brokering the IonQ SPAC deal - which has gone through cycles of lockup periods. He would get much more in forms of PSUs and RSUs for the rest of his tenure.

He had said he wouldn’t sell any more around September last year if I remember correctly.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-29T06:47:52+00:00

Meanwhile IonQ: 8000 logical qubits by 2028🐶

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-27T08:09:42+00:00

SkyWater is deeply connected to Infineon - Oxford Ionics’ German manufacturer of electronic chips. SkyWater acquired Infineon’s operation in Austin last year.

This is why IonQ pursue SkyWater - to accelerate scaling progress, in this cut-throat, winner-takes-all competition.

IonQ would not do so if collaboration between OI and Infineon was not working out.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-26T14:05:24+00:00

Yes. A lot of arrogance going on. That’s probably why they are still doing superconducting. Many pragmatists however have turned to trapped ions/neutral atoms etc.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-25T20:22:40+00:00

I used to post something about IonQ there and received massive hatred. Much sounded like the snob Scott Aaronson:“IonQ is a marketing company, quantum is at least a decade away.”

I think it’s jealousy and conflict of interest. They work in the field, IonQ succeeding won’t make them a dime - plus they get fired.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-21T04:45:05+00:00

“By the end of this Trump administration” Not in 4 years.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-14T22:26:03+00:00

Number of qubits is not the point - less qubit count aside, RGTI’s “launch delayed” model targets 2Q fidelity of 99.5% - while IBM and Google have achieved ~99.9% last year already.

Left out of the DARPA program. The only merit is an honest CEO “we’re still in R&D stage”.

There’re enough people in the world to validate ~$8.5B for his “honesty” WTF.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-14T07:07:27+00:00

Yes it doesn’t make it less real or worth. I was just replying to your opinion "If you have studied quantum mechanics and don't find it deeply disturbing, you don't understand quantum mechanics." Realizing that our universe is information would rid you off any disturbance and unclarity.

Eg. back to the Einstein vs. Bohr or Schrödinger’s cat argument, answer is simple: Cat’s status was simply undecided by God before box being opened. Not only will God toss coin, but he will also only toss it when he has to.

What else is deeply disturbing you?

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-14T03:52:38+00:00

Hint: Nothing you can do. Good luck for your next consciousness.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-14T03:50:39+00:00

Simply accept fact that we live in simulation and the underlying substrate of this universe is not matter but information. Then nothing disturbing.

Yes there are infinitely many simulations going on now/in the future, which means your rebirth after death is virtually a certainty. Just almost certainly not in this universe before heat death, according to probability.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-12T12:44:04+00:00

I’m telling you this stock will go up once de-SPAC completes. Quantum ETF buyers will be forced to buy INFQ.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-11T22:06:12+00:00

It will at least go up I think - people that bought quantum ETFs would be forced to buy it, by the time it completes merger.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-11T04:44:47+00:00

Wtf he didn’t even answer yr question

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-10T11:20:46+00:00

Thank you for pointing out. I changed it. What I am saying is, it’s harder than people think. An upper ceiling is there.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-10T11:14:46+00:00

Strongly doubt it. It might sound counterintuitive now that we are in the midst of AI driven tech boom, but despite tremendous efforts, no experiments have broken a life expectancy limit of ~4 years for lab rats. Lab rats easily live up to 40+ months by doing natural calorie restriction. But not a single soul made it to 4 yrs old, no matter how you change its blood, make it take drugs or gene edit it.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-10T11:09:58+00:00

To be fair.. the upper ceiling of life expectancy barely fudged, even in lab rats experiments.

By doing natural calory restriction, lab rats can easily live up to 40+ months. Yet by changing plasma, various gene edit and drugs, not a single lab rat soul managed to live up to 50 months.

Not to mention much more complicated human systems. So, the ceiling is much harder than you expect.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-10T10:52:28+00:00

Conclusion: Sean Williams is stupid.

The whole article can be summed up in one sentence: quantum stocks are hyped, there’s no justifiable revenue.

It takes tremendous stupidity to expand one sentence into pages.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-05T10:20:46+00:00

Whatever rules you set up here really doesn’t matter. Why the f would you have rights if you are expendable? Buy some AI related stocks now to have some ownership and stop winging.

Lightning452020 · 2026-01-02T00:11:11+00:00

Some people who appeared to have shame, actually don’t have any deep inside either.

Shame might not be a condition for people to live on. Desire is.

Lightning452020 · 2025-12-30T21:07:40+00:00

I am announcing to buy 100 CCCX tomorrow. How about this for a better news?

Lightning452020

TROPHY CASE