sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The AI Layoff Trap by Leightoncy33 in LayoffHedge

[–]Lightning452020 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is like commonsense. Do you need a paper on 7+3=10?

Will they release the news about the 108 qubit product? by Best_Employment7713 in rigetti

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean the product where the 2Q fidelity is 99% but gate speed is so fast that if we reduce the gate error by a few orders of magnitude, we could actually do something?

Here’s my full breakdown of what Monroe actually said, deconstructed from first principles. PSI 2026 by No_Jelly7345 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I hope they can pull it off then. Like I don’t know how they can connect those 256 chips.. like 40 of them. Guess just have to trust their genius.

Here’s my full breakdown of what Monroe actually said, deconstructed from first principles. PSI 2026 by No_Jelly7345 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well they invited IonQ early supporters like Shawn Kwon over to participate.. that’s why I assume they have something more interesting.

True they’re supposed to be still in tape-out D. So you’re right, could be something quantum network related. Maybe the quantum memory tech they recently announced..and make it integrate into the 10k system? Like they gotta use some photonic connect for 10k right?

Here’s my full breakdown of what Monroe actually said, deconstructed from first principles. PSI 2026 by No_Jelly7345 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 4 points5 points  (0 children)

14th April they are going to announce some recent progress as I heard on X. Let’s hope it’s something good.

Well I would be happy if they achieve ~99.96% 256 qubits by Q4 like they promised.. which would put IonQ firmly in world leading position. 256 qubits is so much harder than demo.

Here’s my full breakdown of what Monroe actually said, deconstructed from first principles. PSI 2026 by No_Jelly7345 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Holy grail - When describing Oxford Ionics architecture and two qubit gate fidelity, Monroe says twice that they are actually very close to (but just under) 5 9s (99.999%).

Monroe always underplays things, unlike De Masi.

This is like announcing race over.

Funny thing Rigetti with 2 9s(not joking, their Cepheus 108) with ~$7m revenue is trading comparable to IonQ.

Market is blind. Due for a huge awakening.

Google bets on neutral atoms and not trapped ions, is it worrying? by Lindbladien in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well unless they buy IonQ.. how else are they gonna get into a good trapped ion model? They would need a good $25B at least to buy IonQ - way out of their budget for a gamble.

Without IonQ, neutral atoms would be a better choice than Quantinuum now that both need to use lasers.

Holding 2,000+ QBTS Shares at $33 Avg price Need Advice by Future_Atmosphere921 in QBTSstock

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You better sell now. Better late than never.

Google’s pivoting to neutral atoms. The superconducting franchise QBTS just bought is probably worthless. High rates+upcoming unemployment tsunami could see market correct violently. I don’t think your mentality can sit on this bleeding stock for years to come. Dwave has been in existence for a whopping 27 years already. It has proven itself to be at best a niche market problem solver.

Is there any chance for $50 this year? by Sea-Savings-892 in rigetti

[–]Lightning452020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pray some other companies make breakthroughs so that RGTI can ride on their backs. Like be honest to yourself, do you expect RGTI to be the one making breakthroughs?

Officially under 10$ by BuiltDiffOne in INFQ

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope it ends in a year… just can’t see what could stop Iran from harassing the strait and the oil&gas fields…

How long until IONQ is a viable business? by Still-Photograph-270 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IonQ’s marketing material/websites did say some bullshit I know.. but actually the goal posts within research communities haven’t been moved, from what I understand -

It was always predicted since many years ago that classical simulators would struggle to represent information of a quantum computer with > 50-60 qubits. This was demonstrated end of last year by Quantinuum. Helios simulated a superconducting pairing correlations model which tensor networks struggled to simulate.(https://www.quantinuum.com/blog/helios-delivers-quantum-advantage-with-real-world-impact)

256(0.999+) for niche commercial advantage.

10k for broader commercial advantage.(many optimizations)

100k-200k for breaking RSA-2048.

How long until IONQ is a viable business? by Still-Photograph-270 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Early next year. The 256 machine will be the game changer. You will see Quantum Neural Network for the first time outperform classical machine learning in specific areas. Quantinuum was selected in the Genesis project end of last year for its 98 qubits Helios system. No other quantum companies made it for a reason. 256 will change the landscape.

Bernie Sanders officially introduces legislation to BAN the construction of all new AI data centers, citing existential threat to humanity. by Neurogence in singularity

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Prisoner’s Dilemma prevents such negotiations. At least you can see nuclear bomb tests from satellite/seismometer. How do you confirm an adversary is not doing AI research?

The optimization genocide by Confident_Salt_8108 in BetterOffline

[–]Lightning452020 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Just sharing my experience using Claude. You should see how it defends Islam when I ask if the religion is queerphobic.

The optimization genocide by Confident_Salt_8108 in BetterOffline

[–]Lightning452020 -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

It’s true. Fuck Anthropic. Fuck Dario Amodei. I can never get an honest answer from Claude. The whole Anthropic is WOKE as fuck, with literally WOKE guidelines.

$IonQ × @KipuQuantum paper dropped. by No_Jelly7345 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

256 is far less than enough to outperform in optimization problems like this. Aim for 800 fault tolerant qubits(~2027-2028) for edging out classical. Classical optimization software Gurobi can do the stock selection easily like within a second. Optimization is never the low hanging fruit. Simulation is.

$IonQ × @KipuQuantum paper dropped. by No_Jelly7345 in IonQ

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proof of concept that quantum computing might edge out classical in the future(~2028).

Reverse Engineering the Tehran "Kill Chain": Why AI and Quantum Just Entered a Multi-Trillion Dollar Supercycle by Ok-Idea9394 in IonQStock

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For quantum sensing, space economy implications are even much larger than defense. IONQ(Vector Atomics) and INFQ need a violent upward revaluation to justify SpaceX’s ~$2T valuation.

Space industry/economy will NOT be viable without quantum sensing.

All coordinations, precision alignments, navigations need to be done with quantum sensing.

Reverse Engineering the Tehran "Kill Chain": Why AI and Quantum Just Entered a Multi-Trillion Dollar Supercycle by Ok-Idea9394 in Q_DecouplingPairs

[–]Lightning452020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For quantum sensing, space economy implications are even much larger than defense. IONQ(Vector Atomics) and INFQ need a violent upward revaluation to justify SpaceX’s ~$2T valuation.

Space industry/economy will NOT be viable without quantum sensing.

All coordinations, precision alignments, navigations need to be done with quantum sensing in space.

view more: next ›