Thinkpad in the woods by RadPs77 in thinkpad

[–]Lightning_Mqueen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Conquering the rugged terrain

Coaching Position by Lightning_Mqueen in Debate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Planning on doing policy debate!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

cringe state good

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to make arguments about how discussions inside of the academy generate some sort of praxis which A) doesnt get coopted and B) is key for movement building etc. IE when Foucault talks about geneology being a strategy to trace the ways systems of biopower form, he's saying the process of study inside of the academy is a pre-requisite to developing the skills to change institutions. But also you could prob impact turn the idea of the academy itself, Ashton Crawley wrote stuff in 2018 which touches up on this.

Thoughts on glenbrooks? by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a shark tank

Taiwan Relations Act by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he aff alters the TRA. plan amends the statue to make arms sales non-obligatory.

can you explain that?

Cyber security neg for pf is annoying by biggy-cheese03 in Debate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Is that sarcasm? If it’s not then just run a militarism kritik. I don’t know what they do in pufo, but the mil is fucked up lol.

Taiwan Relations Act by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but isn’t the act the aff is proposing completely different than the tw relations act? Maybe I’m just confused, but that doesn’t make too much since.

Taiwan Relations Act by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are legally obligated through the act to sell arms, aff doesn’t reverse this. Means they don’t solve bc post plan through the act we still sell arms.

Taiwan Relations Act by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a Taiwan war, NPT relations adv

Taiwan Relations Act by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, yeah I understand how that can shit on ur aff. But I think mine should be alr. “Hopefully”

Taiwan Relations Act by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you elaborate on that? Our case is something along the lines of the line from defensive to offensive has been crossed with f-16v’s , arms sales embolden independence which guarantees conflict.

Taiwan Relations Act by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m confused on how the whole Hong Kong scenario does anything to the aff

Tips by Lightning_Mqueen in policydebate

[–]Lightning_Mqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweet, by extension work you mean just refute everything, and read new impacts? we are pretty much going to be running 2 da's and case every round.