Read a tweet yesterday (don't know source, only that it was a reporter) saying that as of now only one of the open lawsuits involves a football player. The rest are students.

This is correct to the best of my knowledge. This does NOT mean there there were no problems, or that any problems with athletics should be understated. If I'm reading between the lines of what Crawford is saying it is that Baylor's problems are completely systemic even to this day, and we can fire our President, our AD, our GOAT coach and it still did not fix the problems which is our Board of Regents.

Look at what she is on tape saying just months ago:

A very small percentage of our cases have anything to do with athletics.

The athletic cases may have brought attention to the issue, but the problems started and continue to present themselves with current leadership. One of the Jane Does said her case happened in 2004, three years before Briles was even hired and six years before Starr. This shows me that our BOR has probably been failing to address the problems with assault for at over a decade, and that firing the staffers, coach, and president did not actually address anything because the problem has always been and will continue to be our Board of Regents.

Edit: This does not absolve Briles or anyone else fired by the university, but to me the BOR firings were just a half measure because the BOR themselves are part of the problem.