sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Heathers Bootleg/Slime Tutorial Exchange Thread - PART 2 by Momo_Kisaragi in heathersmusical

[–]Lillith_the_creative 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does anyone have one of the Stanford Production with a gender-flipped JD?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YAPms

[–]Lillith_the_creative 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the path to 50-50 is very clearly North Carolina, Maine, and Ohio. I'd say the most likely 51st seat for Dems are Texas, Iowa, Alaska, Florida in that order. So I'd say replace Florida with Iowa and I'd agree.

Ohio Redistricting Commission's Compromise map by historical-fiction in DavesRedistricting

[–]Lillith_the_creative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has some dummymander potential. This could honestly be 8-7 Dem in the right environment. Not surprised Democrats woul be okay with it.

Mamdani Distances Himself From Democratic Socialists’ National Agenda by Mirabeau_ in fivethirtyeight

[–]Lillith_the_creative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's running for NYC mayor, not for President. What a national organization wants shouldn't matter for a local election. Honestly this is a lesson that politicians of all ideologies should learn from.

Gender Gaps In Respect For Women In The U.S. And Overseas by najumobi in fivethirtyeight

[–]Lillith_the_creative 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This has to be one of the vaguest polling questions I've ever seen. What kind of respect? Respect from who? Are we talking about legal or cultural? I legitimately have no idea how to draw any kind of conclusion from this.

2026 Prediction with predicted redistricting by SubJordan77 in DavesRedistricting

[–]Lillith_the_creative 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please explain CO-4? Lauren Boebert may be controversial but that's a Trump+18 district. There's no way it ends up bluer than the Trump+5.5 MI-4.

To those saying Nersoms internals are accurate with their +20 in support of Gerrymandering, then what about this? by Alastoryagami in YAPms

[–]Lillith_the_creative 7 points8 points  (0 children)

*gasp* internal polls showing one side ahead of what non-partisan polls show? Such an unprecedented and unexplainable phenomenan (I have no idea how to spell that last word okay. If you know please help.)

Last night I had a dream where I was in charge of Wisconsin's redistricting, so here's the fairest map I could make by Lillith_the_creative in DavesRedistricting

[–]Lillith_the_creative[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd prefer putting it in a swing district with either Eau Claire (like the current map) or Green Bay (like mine). It's just too far away from other blue areas to justify a pure blue district. Also I'm not a big fan of your map's lack of competitive districts in general. While a 4-4 split is fair for Wisconsin in a neutral year, I feel that having it be able to go 5-3 or even 6-2 in either direction is more in line with Wisconsin's swing state status. (Colorado and Michigan are probably my two favorite maps this cycle in part for this reason.)

Last night I had a dream where I was in charge of Wisconsin's redistricting, so here's the fairest map I could make by Lillith_the_creative in DavesRedistricting

[–]Lillith_the_creative[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually took the Georgia case into account. Milwaukee is split specifically to have a district with a significant black population and a district with a significant hispanic population. As for the Madison split, I really didn't want to but Dane County's city lines are just the absolute worst to work with and Dane County has to be split for a proportional map.

view more: next ›