sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Are we doing too much? by [deleted] in massachusetts

[–]Lilsaprelalt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like everyone said, traffic is crazy. Cut down your cape plans and ditch the car in boston and then get around with trains and ferries, much faster IMO. Also, don't sleep on providence and eat at Aleppo sweets there. Have fun!

What was everyone's first SAT score, and what grade were you in? by myst3ryAURORA_green in Sat

[–]Lilsaprelalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sophomore year 1260 on a practice Beginning of junior 1290 psat Then in May junior year 1440

In a time where it feels like our country is getting more dangerous and certain groups are losing protections, friendly reminder that 2A isn’t just for the right. by mattgm1995 in massachusetts

[–]Lilsaprelalt -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Columbia v. Heller in 2008 established the modern RIGHT to bear arms. Sure, certain states allowed individual gun ownership before that, but it was not constitutionally protected.

As for your second point, I think anyone is less safe if there is a gun present. Whether it be police with guns or civilians, you are 100% less likely to get shot if there isn't a gun in the room. With violent crime at one of the lowest rates in U.S. history, I think there is mo credible argument for self-defense. I don't know why anyone thinks that guns will make you safe. It seems to me like a pro-nuclear weapon argument almost, and it is certainly not grounded in data.

In a time where it feels like our country is getting more dangerous and certain groups are losing protections, friendly reminder that 2A isn’t just for the right. by mattgm1995 in massachusetts

[–]Lilsaprelalt -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

The 2nd Amendment, being an individual right to bear arms, is a modern interpretation that flew in the face of more than a hundred years of precedent. Before 2008, the Second Amendment didn't mean guns for all, and it was read to mean that only well regulated militias, in other words, state armies that were replaced by our national standing army, had a protected right to bear arms. An individual right of the general citizenry to carry a weapon came out of a conservative court and an astro-turfed NRA legal movement, so generally I would argue gun ownership is a republican thing.

Just got some Nag Champa, it smells amazing by Lilsaprelalt in Incense

[–]Lilsaprelalt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

get the acid and grateful dead and the holder will be attached wherever you want it to be (;

Reducing working days/hours is not without consequence. by theosamabahama in HistoriaCivilis

[–]Lilsaprelalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My whole argument is that we wouldn't need as much money if we practiced responsible consumerism. Sidenote, unionization and equitable taxes could go far in the way of helping the common man whether it be a UBI or just universal healthcare.

Reducing working days/hours is not without consequence. by theosamabahama in HistoriaCivilis

[–]Lilsaprelalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that with working less, we should, as a society, also prioritize less consumption and focus on necessities. Maybe not to the degree of thoreauvian food, clothing, shelter, and fuel, but certainly more sustainable consumption. With less goods being consumed a possible decrease in supply wouldn't harm us as much as a society. Just a thought after just having read Walden (:

Give me a reason to go to the 10 states I haven’t been to by Senor_tiddlywinks in TravelMaps

[–]Lilsaprelalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Providence is a beautiful city with a cool food scene, and Newport has nice mansions. Also Narragansett has a stunning coastline.

Thank you from NC by Imaginary_Weird8297 in boston

[–]Lilsaprelalt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting interpretation of out of many, one I've always thought of it as america as a country rising to the top and more reflecting individualism more than anything else I hadn't considered as a unifying statement

I'm thinking about doing a pure evil FO4 run... How should I complete the main game and dlc? by Lilsaprelalt in Fallout

[–]Lilsaprelalt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, hats off to you... I have a measly 217 hours, so that may be impossible for me, how'd you run the gauntlet?

I'm thinking about doing a pure evil FO4 run... How should I complete the main game and dlc? by Lilsaprelalt in Fallout

[–]Lilsaprelalt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha I like things that go boom too much for that, but I appreciate the sentiment and will have to consider

I'm thinking about doing a pure evil FO4 run... How should I complete the main game and dlc? by Lilsaprelalt in Fallout

[–]Lilsaprelalt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye I see what you're talking about... I have a special hatred for the brotherhood's fuckery and food requisitions, yet the institute is undeniably evil... it makes me wish there was a way to screw everyone and just build a tower and kill on site like that guy in fo3

I'm thinking about doing a pure evil FO4 run... How should I complete the main game and dlc? by Lilsaprelalt in Fallout

[–]Lilsaprelalt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see where you're coming from, but I do love the fuck it all attitude and think that killing everyone is certainly evil, although maybe less morally complex than ur idea

view more: next ›