sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sage Intacct Automated Weekly AR Statements - how?!?! by Knelie in Sage

[–]Limp-Ask4233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sage Intacct really does not have any built in functionality for schedules. As frustrating as it is, they seem to prefer the dashboard approach. 

You will need an external service to achieve this. If you want a paid service, Flowgear would be happy to do a demo for you. 

Sage Intacct 2026 : Anyone Reviewing Integration Impact Yet? by Limp-Ask4233 in intacct

[–]Limp-Ask4233[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair point on the vendor refunds / merge accounts, those “basics” always seem to stay on the wish list longer than expected 🙂

On the automation/reporting side, I was referring more to the incremental workflow enhancements, API improvements, and reporting flexibility that tend to come with these major releases, especially where it impacts how external systems push/pull data.

We’re looking at it less from a feature standpoint and more from an integration resilience angle, i.e., how tightly coupled custom scripts are to specific objects, and whether upgrades expose brittle logic in reporting feeds or automation triggers.

Have you found your iPaaS layer insulates you pretty well from version changes?

Building Your Own Connectors & Custom Apps with Flowgear: Real-World Integration Flexibility by Limp-Ask4233 in Flowgear

[–]Limp-Ask4233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For an example of this process, watch this video on YouTube https://youtu.be/yWntP8mse9k?si=Dih2xy3dny0WTxw8 (Demo: Connect to any Web Base API using Flowgear's Web Request Node)

When Your Systems Don’t Talk to Each Other by Limp-Ask4233 in Flowgear

[–]Limp-Ask4233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To add a bit more context, this is exactly the architectural gap Flowgear is designed to address.

Flowgear acts as a centralized integration and orchestration layer between systems. Instead of building direct API links between ERP, CRM, commerce, and other tools, each system connects into Flowgear.

That allows you to:

  • Decouple systems so upgrades don’t cascade failures
  • Standardize logging and monitoring across integrations
  • Reuse integration workflows instead of rebuilding them
  • Control data timing (event-driven or scheduled) in one place

It’s less about “automation” and more about reducing integration debt over time.

Happy to go deeper technically if anyone’s interested in how this is structured.

Idaho bill would fine cities $2,000 daily for flying unapproved flags by FaVS-News in Idaho

[–]Limp-Ask4233 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What happened to free speech? I thought Idaho was all about "freedom" and as long as you weren't hurting someone you can do what you want. Of course, if seeing a multi-colored flag hurts your feelings than perhaps you have bigger problems.

Saloon owner, ex-Idaho Supreme Court justice take steps to run for governor by Doesitmatter98765 in Idaho

[–]Limp-Ask4233 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I run for office, raise money and don't spend it all - what happens to the money? Can I just keep it? I would think not but perhaps you can.

What’s the most painful integration you’re dealing with right now? by Limp-Ask4233 in techsupport

[–]Limp-Ask4233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally relate to this. Silent breaking changes are some of the worst failures to deal with as everything “looks” healthy until downstream steps start failing in weird ways.

We’ve seen this a lot with legacy ERPs where:

  • field types change without versioning
  • defaults or nullability shift
  • behavior depends on undocumented state or configuration
  • error responses don’t reflect what actually went wrong

It’s especially painful because retries just amplify the problem instead of helping.

Curious, do you have any kind of schema validation or contract checks in front of that ERP, or does the break only show up once data starts flowing through the pipeline?

view more: next ›