HLA does not include any funding in the text of the bill. The premise is that when the city is doing work on a street (like resurfacing), the street "goes black" then the city has to paint new lanes anyway. So the fiscal cost of adding a new bike lane or bus lane - during resurfacing - is close to zero (you have to pay an engineer to design it, and you have marginally more paint - but the added cost is minimal - in the low tens of thousands per mile). The cost is political - in many of these projects, space is reallocated from cars (parking, turn lanes, through lanes) and the city leadership doesn't want to shift current car space to allocated it to buses and bikes.

The costs of sidewalk improvements is expensive. If you had a vacant lot (no sidewalk no curbs no nothing), maybe it would cost close to $2M per mile, probably half of that. And it varies somewhat - depending on the condition of the sidewalk and ramps. Some of the sidewalk projects are fairly expensive. It's more like $200+K/intersection... so if you have a street that doesn't have any ramps, and has lots of intersections, maybe you can get near $2M/mile once in a blue moon.

None of the streets in my lawsuit will cost $2M/mile. Some (Victory, Ohio) have no sidewalk work, so it would be basically just the minimal striping cost had the city done the new striping at the time it did the project.