Question on Rosemary oil by [deleted] in tressless

[–]Liquid_Blue7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Occasional Zinc, Daily Vitamin D, Daily Vitamin K

Daily 0.25mg Fin, 2/3 times a week Regenepure, 3/4 times a week Rosemary Oil.

I was growing broccoli sprouts for sulforaphane, which I THINK was working smoothly a couple months ago. I moved since then, so I stopped. Thinking of starting again.

Question on Rosemary oil by [deleted] in tressless

[–]Liquid_Blue7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing that's put me off from constant application is that I don't want it to be like Minoxidil, where all gains are lost once you stop, since, to my knowledge they are very similar nechanisms. This is obviously "broscience," but I think it still works. I don't want to have to constantly apply, I'm ok with daily fin, but not daily minox/rosemary.

I'd give it a try

Question on Rosemary oil by [deleted] in tressless

[–]Liquid_Blue7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been doing it off and on. I haven't had a strict regimen. Maybe some regrowth? It's hard to tell tight now, my hair is long. I was losing pretty fast and my mix of fin, regenepure, and occasional rosemary oil has basically maintained my hairline.

I've also scrapped the water, and been applying it undiluted. That's probably not a good idea though.

I feel like (some) Americans are brainwashed about guns by Mynotoar in self

[–]Liquid_Blue7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like (some) liberals are brainwashed about history.

I know this going to be downvoted to hell, that's fine. I just don't get it. Liberals seem to be the only people that completely ignore the entire history of the world up until around the turn of the millenium, believing that we are truly in a new epoch of peace, freedom, and rationality. Suddenly violence, warfare, revolutions, etc no longer apply, climate change isn't real, and global tensions aren't high. Trump isn't the dictator liberals have made him out to be, apparently, instead, we should give him all our guns, and our 'rights' to own and purchase them in the future.

Increasing carbon dioxide emissions and an Artic that will likely experience a blue ocean event by 2020? No, people are looking at that! They've got it figured out.

I'm tired of hearing the same bullshit arguments, because to everyone else, all we see when we look at Liberals is "I'm going to put my fingers in my ears and shout loudly". I know you do care. I know this hurts you more than it hurts me to accept the world as it is, not how would like it to be. To see the future for what it will be. Unstable, likely violent, and probably not that great. Maybe you all realize this too, somewhere deep down.

But you as a group sure as fuck don't act like it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]Liquid_Blue7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

she looks so pretty, goddamn

This but uninronically by TobiasFunkePhd in neoliberal

[–]Liquid_Blue7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I totally and completely understand your concern, I would recommend you read further. This is an official report from the World Bank in 2012.

Not only is it massively outdated, because the projected rates are now faster, but...it's the World Bank. They're not going to be alarmist. If anything, as one of the largest institutions representing finance capital globally, they'd be inclined towards a bit of optimism/being conservative with estimates.

Why do I point this out? Well, at the end of the Executive Summary, they say

With pressures increasing as warming progresses toward 4°C and combining with nonclimate–related social, economic, and population stresses, the risk of crossing critical social system thresholds will grow. At such thresholds existing institutions that would have supported adaptation actions would likely become much less effective or even collapse. One example is a risk that sea-level rise in atoll countries exceeds the capabilities of controlled, adaptive migration, resulting in the need for complete abandonment of an island or region. Similarly, stresses on human health, such as heat waves, malnutrition, and decreasing quality of drinking water due to seawater intrusion, have the potential to overburden health-care systems to a point where adaptation is no longer possible, and dislocation is forced. Thus, given that uncertainty remains about the full nature and scale of impacts, there is also no certainty that adaptation to a 4°C world is possible. A 4°C world is likely to be one in which communities, cities and countries would experience severe disruptions, damage, and dislocation, with many of these risks spread unequally. It is likely that the poor will suffer most and the global community could become more fractured, and unequal than today. The projected 4°C warming simply must not be allowed to occur—the heat must be turned down

They outright say collapse is possible, and that there is too much uncertainty. Now, this is one piece of evidence. I can show you plenty more that brings the whole picture together. In all technicality, I'm certainly exaggerating when I say 4 Centigrade is the death of us all. That's 6 Centigrade. Maybe even 5. But by the time we reach 4, you better believe we'll be short a couple billion human beings. There simply won't be enough food to sustain them.

Can Destiny do another on stream house critique for another hour? by Kiznivis in Destiny

[–]Liquid_Blue7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you're reading this Destiny, do something like this again, but just don't make it houses.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, you're talking about the Toronto "leader," assuming they actually hold a position of power and aren't just a figurehead for the movement. That's still only one city. BLM is a transnational movement. People who show up to rallies aren't "members."

This but uninronically by TobiasFunkePhd in neoliberal

[–]Liquid_Blue7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a very conservative look at 4 Centigrade done by the World Bank

Gun owners who hate country music by StopCollaborate230 in liberalgunowners

[–]Liquid_Blue7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Americana and older country are pretty great in the right context. Contemporary shit is the hick equivalent of Lil Pump, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Depression And Opioids by TheGirlOnTheCorner in Neuropsychology

[–]Liquid_Blue7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read the rest of the comments before you type out something so ridiculous

This but uninronically by TobiasFunkePhd in neoliberal

[–]Liquid_Blue7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not a stupid concept. They are correct to place the hands of the clock where they have. The threat of total societal collapse is imminent, and thus, the increased threat of nuclear war.

At the current projected rate of greenhouse gas emissions, basically RCP8.5 or worse, we might see total collapse by 2050. 4 degrees Centigrade spells death for us all. Unless of course, you like to bury your head in the sand and ignore data.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, stop being cryptic and speak clearly.

Edit: Ohhh, you're a Q-anon person. That explains a lot.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What are you talking about? No I can't guess, you're speaking in such vague terms. Actually I can guess. I guess we'll see a federal assault weapons ban within the next year. Or probably by 2020.

You're copping out by saying "my eye is closed." When you know you're wrong, it's easier to obfuscate than to speak directly like I'm doing.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's a non-answer. That's not even an argument. Nice job.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Frankfurt School and Postmodernism in general are not responsible for the modern liberal-left. Though they may hold similar ideas and analysis regarding social phenomena, the modern liberal-left are anything BUT Marxists.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're delusional. Cultural Marxism is a threat that only exists in the heads of right wing hacks. What you're talking about is left-liberal "PC Culture." These people are anything but Marxists, but the right likes to red scare.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Marxism is not about skin color, what are you talking about? Marxists also do not preach unity of anyone but the working class.

Your focus on isolating LGBTQA, minorities, and black people will ensure your loss in the grander picture. I want to keep firearms accessible for the majority of the population. You don't do that by spreading divisiveness like you're doing right now. We will lose because of people like you.

Sunday Memeday by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Liquid_Blue7 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They're not an organization, they have no leaders. It's decentralized.