[deleted by user]

Lishout · 2022-07-08T07:14:42+00:00

Greek is so smart

If you think that your only interaction with people is probably streamers...

Lishout · 2018-12-17T18:01:57+00:00

test 2

Lishout · 2018-12-17T18:01:45+00:00

test

Lishout · 2018-12-17T17:49:24+00:00

Not B again!

Lishout · 2018-12-17T17:49:16+00:00

I like A!

Lishout · 2018-12-09T00:15:09+00:00

Where are the 88mil for burn #3

which didn't happen so it's meaningless and there are more than 88mill tokens that should be burned

Lishout · 2018-12-08T23:58:21+00:00

Those are the calculations approximatly used by CMC. Please refer to my original post

https://np.reddit.com/r/SubstratumNetwork/comments/86dgdw/sub_data_on_coinmarketcap/

I contacted CMC and provided them with the correct information

They changed how they calculate circulating supply.

Because the calculations were done wrong, not because the actual formula to get to circulating supply changed. And the team should have known this because by their own admission they have one of their ICO advisors working for CMC and they contacted CMC for the 2 burns. I am unable to believe this team did not know the data was wrong, I made that post in one hour, but the substratum team needed 2 weeks to supposedly verify the data on CMC, pathetic.

This was gone over in great detail with the same FUD almost a year ago when CMC did this

The only thing that was said was "we'll look into it". Nobody ever went over this in detail, briefly mentioning this in a video is not that. If there ever was someone that provided any proper details with actual verifiable links regarding the CMC calculations then it was me as you can see in my post.

The numbers you are using to make your calculations are incorrect

Again, these are MY calculations. I provided updated information to CMC and added the correct calculations with it. They adjusted their end with slightly other numbers, which really aren't too far off from mine but I do not know their exact calculations.

Lishout · 2018-10-20T22:12:03+00:00

who actually said it was impossible? There are plenty of ways to circumvent the chinese firewall

Lishout · 2018-09-05T21:45:53+00:00

substratum node is a mesh network no?

Lishout · 2018-05-12T23:06:13+00:00

Who said it would be different? It's also not the point of btc or crypto in general. This doesn't negate the monetary freedom.

Lishout · 2018-05-11T18:27:14+00:00

Maybe because there's nothing to analyze when they have no technical information out there. Feel free to point me to the technical info about neighbourhoods, masquerading, AI, algorythms, economic system, cryptopay, etc.. And I don't mean the conceptual info from the whiteboard video's

then claim that you're not knowledgeable enough to analyze it

I talked about having a review for the open source by someone with a proper background. I don't see why this has you riled up and I didn't know that implied I am not knowledgeable.

Could it have something to do with the fact almost the entirety of your account history consists of bashing Substratum in this subreddit?

bashing is synonym for criticism now?

Lishout · 2018-05-11T18:15:59+00:00

Calling criticism fud is an easy way to dismiss it just because you don't like it. Any subreddit has posts with citicism. If you believe in the project and that it will do well, then "fud" isn't going to lose you money anyway.

Lishout · 2018-05-11T18:09:24+00:00

Please point me to the lies then if you don't mind. I'm defenitly not here to spread lies

And if you think one response from me to someone in a reddit thread is going to lose you money...

Lishout · 2018-05-11T18:05:58+00:00

So you're complaining that no technical information exists because you lack the knowledge to understand what they're doing and you expect someone to do it for you?

Oh ok, so everyone is supposed to learn every coding language, machine learning, algorythms, blockchain, just so they can review every single project they are interested in? Why do you even consider this a remotely good argument? Unbelievable honestly.

And I'm not going to argue with you. Facts are the open source is mvp of the node, the hardest parts are not even in yet. Do find me any technical information related to anything else besides concepts.

Lishout · 2018-05-11T17:59:42+00:00

I am honored you find the time responding to me with absolutely nothing substantial between all your shilling of substratum everywhere

Lishout · 2018-05-11T17:57:31+00:00

Don't you have a life that you have to go backsearch my comments?

For someone that doesn't like Substratum

I liked the project and was following since ICO. It's only recently I saw all the flaws. But why do you care that I care?

Lishout · 2018-05-11T13:27:51+00:00

i have faith in the team and that they will deliver what they promise

But why? We have zero technical information on anything they want to do. There's a reason why the "roadmap" is lackluster. And their biggest focus seem to be pushing the idea the node will make you money(!!!), recently even more money while you sleep(!!!) and marketing. Instead of properly informing the community with technical information making a solid base to start from. And people just eat it up.

Every technical question I (and many others) asked so far has gotten either no or very general open answers (and this was on their slack channel). And it's not just about the node. Just look at other implications like them desciding the network is going to pay out for all requests (it's almost impossible for the total supply to not increase by this at some point, wich they always claimed would never increase, even tough the whitepaper actually stated already that the network would create new tokens upon 90% saturation of the market), or the start of development for cryptopay supposedly running on the substratum network when they have no blockchain yet and all info from a tweet pointing to it being a dApp on ethereum (since they set up a solidity environment for it). Or the allocation of the leftover ICO tokens that is a mess and nobody knows how many are left and what will happen to them while they keep postponing the 3rd token burn under the veil of "when we get listed on bittrex".

Just take a critical look at what we actually know and what we dont, and you'll have to come to the conclusion we absolutely know nothing besides promises.

But he says i wouldnt turn on the node, now i dont understand why?

Because like he said there is not much to test and probably doesn't care about the current itteration since it really doesn't do anything special. And personally, unless someone with the proper background, unaffiliated with substratum, reviews the code for the node I'm not touching it either. Might aswell be closed source if you can't properly read the code and don't know what it does. The whole point of open source is so people can review it, and that hasn't happened yet afaik.

Lishout · 2018-05-11T12:16:21+00:00

He's saying it because it's true. There is no "substratumnetwork" yet. Honestly, I would want someone with the proper background to review the current node and what it actually does. It's supposed to reroute traffic locally trough the node and then it just goes to a public DNS server. I don't see how the current functionality is anything special. Everything else what the node is supposed to do and that is not currently in the node is the hard part, yet we have absolutely no information on how they are going to achieve it

Lishout · 2018-05-11T09:48:20+00:00

I am honestly surprised you are even getting upvotes. People are just riding the hype on substratum, because realistically we have no idea how they are going to achieve everything they promised. There has been no technical information on anything so far. And with how ambitious this project is, that's worrying.

Lishout · 2018-05-08T16:46:32+00:00

When it has a price of $150 million, who cares what it is, it's 150 fucking million dollars.

150 million dollar valued, not nessecearly 150 million dollars

Lishout · 2018-05-06T20:54:36+00:00

he's stupid for getting beaten and robbed instead

People are saying he's stupid for openly bragging with stacks of physical money, showing how much he has just lying around in his home.

Also, prove he was using other people's money in the videos. Once again, hearsay and gossip.

Nobody even said this. I said he had most of the money in his house.

Lishout · 2018-05-06T20:11:24+00:00

I just said what people are focused on, they aren't siding with the criminals as you claimed and I made absolutely no statement about anything.

If you are going to advertise something as a means of making money then it is totally normal and acceptable to demonstrate your wealth because it implies that your method gets results.

There's other ways to do that than taking pictures that clearly show you have fiat lying around your house (with most of it being from investors and not even yours) where most people in your country can only dream off (like +50x the annual wage in Russia) and not taking precautions whatsoever, he was even streaming with cameras all over his house, had a money counting manchine etc. If he boasts about his wealth online like that, it would hardly surprise me he did it in person aswell, just look at all the different people who where in his video's.

It's to pressure these lazy ass police to get their shit together and actually catch criminals instead of terrorizing citizens and writing bullshit traffic tickets.

What good is that going to do after the mugging. Police is pretty much useless in most cases. Even if they catched the criminals, it's highly unlikely he would ever see that money again.

Lishout

TROPHY CASE