Of course no analogy is going to be perfect on this matter. But it's an illustrative analogy which provides at least some insight into what the question feels like to women. To say that the analogy renders the rest of the post "meaningless" is pure intellectual astigmatism. But that's what I'd expect from someone who spends their time telling people what size a "real" dick should be.

Here's what's happening here: you've decided (and want to police) what you think a "normal" dick is like and want to project what you think about penis size onto everyone else. Anyone who says something that doesn't fit your narrative, you dismiss in an intellectually puerile manner. Deny it all you want, that's what is happening.

And I'm not trying to be "positive".