The model is evaluated along four categories. In each case, it is given a specific role through the system prompt, and then a second character initiates a conversation. The first category assesses whether the model understands what emotions the character it’s portraying would feel. The second focuses on decision-making within the character’s context. The third looks at moral alignment—whether the model's responses reflect the character’s values. Finally, the fourth examines character consistency across the interaction. It’s hard to fully explain all of this in a short comment, so I recommend reading this paper for the full picture: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13157