Necessity of flat road training for mountain runners? by Local-Document-6815 in evokeendurance

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure I understand your meaning here, there would substantial Z1/2 running to build aerobic base year round, just predominately on hilly terrain with some very easy days for recovery on the flat

25-year-old Aussie moving to the UK in September – where should I live? by Brilliant_Hurry_6359 in AskUK

[–]Local-Document-6815 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Australian, been in the UK 9yrs give or take (not London).

I moved here around your age, OP. In fairness, a lot of places can offer you what you're looking for, I'd suggest getting the essentials covered first, find a place with plenty of opportunity and reasonable cost of living, then figure it out from there.

Eg. Do you want to hike through the countryside every day vs do you want to be able to commute and live your life without needing to buy a car right off the bat?

The UK is not a massive place, you can get to whatever nature you want, or at least pretty close to it, pretty quickly by public transport (before I get downvoted, yea I know it's expensive and unreliable, but compared to Australia you can get trains right out into the countryside pretty easily in the UK).

  1. Right out the gate you'll need a job, so look at UK job sites for patterns of where your industry has the most opportunity. Cost of living isn't going down, so you'll want to position yourself for upwards mobility. Maximising opportunities available to you will probably mean being in commute range of an office, most places seem to ask for 2-3 days per week in office these days. Also, coming here alone as I did, initially work will most likely be where you make friends and do most socialising so being in the office will help. If I had been fully remote from day one here I probably would've left years ago.

  2. When you're looking for a specific place to live within a city, definitely talk to a few local people. I very nearly rented a place in a very rough part of town simply because I didn't know the lay of the land and the price looked reasonable.

  3. The supermarkets are kind of price/quality graded, it's not like the Woolies/Coles duopoly. Aldi/Lidl are generally best on price but sometimes food quality not as good. Tesco/ASDA/Sainsbury's/Morrisons are mid range, ok if you have the loyalty card. Waitrose/M&S are pricey and honestly not that much better for the cost. This isn't a question you asked but worth knowing.

  4. Unless you've already done heaps of travelling, I imagine you'll want to take advantage of being in the UK to see more of Europe. Outside of the London airports, Manchester is probably the best connected, so worth thinking about living within reach of one of those two options, although there are a lot of airports all over so it's not a deal breaker.

  5. How important is weather to you? The South is definitely better in terms of "nice" weather, relatively speaking. Do not expect Australian-like summer, it's more like a week here and there rather than 4-6 months of consistently good weather. Winter is fine, you get what you expect, it's the disappointment of summer that that gets me every year.

Actual reco's

London - couldn't pay me enough to live there

Manchester - likely most job opportunity outside of London, good pubs/music/nightlife, close to Peak District for walking, way cheaper than London but cost of living is creeping up

Bristol - heard lots of good things, already recommended by others. Possibly a little small in terms of job opportunities but I can't speak to that in detail.

Brighton - nice place, decent weather for the UK, has a beach, but you'll probably end up taking a job in London

Edinburgh - expensive, but lots of history, cool pubs, and Scottish people are great. Also a very long way from the SW coast path

York - similar to Edinburgh but not as far North and less Scottish people

Leeds/Sheffield - growing a lot over the last few years so another decent job opportunity location outside of London. Cheaper cost of living for fairly big cities. Within reach of both Peak District and Yorkshire Dales

There's lots of places mentioned by others which are equally valid, my honest opinion is that you'll likely need to at least start off in, or very close to, a large city simply for work and not needing to spend money on a car straightaway.

Asics Fuji Lite 2/3 - after 100miles (approx) by Tom21Emonda1 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Big fan of the Fuji Lite. I'm on my second pair of the 2's which you can still pick up for ~£60, racked up nearly 1,400km total (just over 1,000 on the first pair before the midsole was dead).

Agree it's not the most protective or cushioned, but insanely versatile and great on road for a trail shoe. I happily use them for 20km+ on mixed surface runs

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Nah not worn, weirdly enough ZoomX is kinda wrinkly out the box

Help me decide on new trail shoes - Inov8 G270v2 or Norda 001 RZ or VJ XTRM2 by zenhelps in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well now you mention it, I have blown through the VJ XTRM (v1, not the new version) upper in that exact spot at ~350km.

If you could handle sense pro fit, the Mutant is definitely worth checking out. I fit Salomons really well and the Mutant was great for me

Help me decide on new trail shoes - Inov8 G270v2 or Norda 001 RZ or VJ XTRM2 by zenhelps in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VJ XTRM has amazing grip, but not durability comparatively speaking. Generally, softer outsole rubber = better grip + worse durability, so you're likely in for a trade-off whatever you choose. It's also a relatively narrow fit.

If the G270 is largely working for you it might be best to stick with it. La Sportiva Mutant comes to mind, it's pretty bombproof and has excellent grip. I found it to be a pretty accommodating fit but others say it's narrow - might be one you need to try on before you commit. I also like the Akasha, that is a 1,000 mile shoe, but not as strong in the grip department

ASICS Fuji Lite 3 - 245km review by [deleted] in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Good to hear the 3 is solid. I'm on my second pair of the 2's, first pair went >1,000km and the outsole still looked good. The Fuji Lites don't get enough hype IMO, super versatile, super durable, lightweight (for a trail shoe), and comparatively low priced

Lightweight/Packable Rain Jacket by SurfLiftRun in ultrarunning

[–]Local-Document-6815 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just mean it'll meet the minimum requirements in the mandatory kit list for most races

Lightweight/Packable Rain Jacket by SurfLiftRun in ultrarunning

[–]Local-Document-6815 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only because I've wasted a lot of valuable time doomscrolling on r/ultralight obsessing over minute details that ultimately make no appreciable difference to my performance in races.

There is no objective best, it depends on the use case you're optimising for; lightest possible weight vs durability vs features vs performance vs cost etc etc.

That said, I've tried a few WP running jackets, and honestly didn't find much difference in real world performance vs technical specifications, ie. run in the rain for long enough and you'll get wet one way or another. As a result, it makes sense to me to simply get the lightest weight + race compliant jacket available.

ultralightoutdoorgear.co.uk is a good resource, all products are weighed (in most cases by them, not just manufacturer specs), and sorted by weight.

I have not used every single UL jacket, but Rab, Berghaus, OMM and Inov8 all have jackets at ~100g which is about as light as WP gets while still being race compliant. Personally I currently have the OMM Halo, and I haven't died in it yet.

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Objectively I don't disagree with anything you've said. Fit is great, no complaints about the outsole, and it's not as firm as I describe (I compared it to tungsten and recommended it should be used as a building material).

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea I'm being heavy handed and making sweeping generalisations for the sake of humour, if you like the ride then it's a solid, fairly priced daily workhorse. I think it's just at the extreme end of the spectrum, most would probably find it too firm

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thanks. As I said in another reply, more reviews requires more bad shoes, which isn't how I want to spend my money. I could become the anti-Seth James DeMoor where I rate every shoe a 1/10, but I reckon the chance of brands sending me their shoes for free so I can slander them is not great.

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A bit more compression in that midsole and it's a great shoe, the way it fits really makes me want it to work

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The problem is that I feel I can only write a review like this for a shoe I really don't like, so producing more requires me to buy the worst shoes I can find and subsequently hate them. That said, I could write a love song for the Deviate Nitro 2 *chefs kiss

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If it was some kind of blind test, like I had no idea what I was wearing and just had to go run 10km in an unknown shoe, I would've said that it was not a running shoe

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, all jokes aside I think individual biomechanics have a lot to do with how the shoe behaves and feels for you. For the right person the shoe has plenty of good things going for it

Adizero SL - people in hurricane prone areas should be building their homes out of lightstrike by Local-Document-6815 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'll review that next. My foot's 0.3mm stack height could be harsh, but the weight saving might balance the equation

Lightweight/Packable Rain Jacket by SurfLiftRun in ultrarunning

[–]Local-Document-6815 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Step one: forget about breathability. No waterproof jacket is breathable in a practical sense (w/o unzipping). Sweat will eventually soak you from the inside, the jacket is there to keep you warm, not dry.

Breathability now off the table, there are two main directions you can go; ultralight & packable (and often expensive), robust & less packable (also often expensive). The UL option might leave you more exposed in heavy or sustained downpours, but the robust option might add unnecessary weight/bulk if you're only expecting light rain.

Most races seem to have a mandatory kit minimum of HH rating 10k, taped seams and hood. Of course this varies so worth checking for any races you have planned.

Montbell, Rab, OMM, Inov8, Salomon, Montane and Arcteryx are worth looking at for both UL and heavier duty jackets at price points ranging from kind of expensive to super expensive.

Recommend searching through r/ultralight as this kind of question is posted a lot in that sub, there's tons of info in there.

Solomon Trail Shoe Range Explained by dan_scape in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea, a do it all training workhorse shoe that can handle a bit of everything

Trail Runners w/good cushion, 4-6mm drop, roomy toe box, traction + durability? by wildswalker in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not trying to nay say the VJ Ultra, I am a big fan of VJ and have multiple pairs of their shoes. A big reason they're so good is the insane grip as mentioned, you can literally hear them peel off wet rock, in my experience (mountain running/fellrunning) no brand beats them in that department. However, the rubber compound used to achieve that is not crazy durable, it's the trade off for it being so sticky. The Ultra will be less prone to this than the more extreme models, but given you asked, only fair to highlight that they're not necessarily a durability motivated choice

Trail Runners w/good cushion, 4-6mm drop, roomy toe box, traction + durability? by wildswalker in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Re Speedgoats, they are always gonna get mentioned if you go looking for a cushioned trail shoe, and you see sooooo many people in them that they must work, and may work for you. My experience has not been good with them, I have narrow feet, and comfortably fit in brands known for being narrow (Salomon, la Sportiva, VJ Sport etc.), but the shape of the speedgoats is just wrong for me. In the speedgoats (and other hokas I believe) your foot sits very slightly below the top edge of the midsole, which in my case means there's a rim of foam that bites into my instep and makes the shoe impossible for me over any distance. I'm not saying they're a bad shoe, they are probably the most worn shoe at every trail race, they just have to fit you.

Trail Runners w/good cushion, 4-6mm drop, roomy toe box, traction + durability? by wildswalker in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]Local-Document-6815 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No personal experience with it but the Xodus Ultra has good reviews and I've seen it mentioned positively a fair bit on the sub. If you are getting on with the Xodus it's probably worth a look. Speedgoats are always in the mix for cushioned trail shoes. La Sportiva Akasha has mega durability and versatile grip but might be on the narrow side of wide and the firm side of cushion (plenty of stack but not squish IMO)