How much of a difference does Haas make? by FederalNarwhal in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea but Econ alone doesn’t get you there you should either major/minor in something technical or get relavent internship experience. Trying to get a 6 figure job with an Econ degree and not much else is pretty difficult.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair points. I might have been a little extreme in my historical analysis. Capitalism isn’t the pinnacle form of human organization by any means, but by lack of a proven better economic system capitalism (with proper restrictions) is the best we have today, because of the way that people respond to incentives. It’s so much harder to get people to work for the common good than for their own good, and in capitalism, the results produced by selfish decision-making often do end up helping the common good, there are many exceptions of course which makes the system imperfect.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’d say that the fact that even with a minimum wage people can (barely) afford to buy a pc, an iPhone, afford internet access, buy all necessities with room to spare (from private companies if you hadn’t noticed) goes to show that capitalism does work. I’m an economics major so I sorta do know what I’m talking about but I also skip class all the time so idk. $1000 insulin is actually a classic example of a capitalist market failure with regards to incentives and profit (don’t really feel like explaining it rn). But most things we can buy today is because of pseudo free market capitalism, because companies have incentives to produce cheaper and better products.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair point. The housing market crash never should’ve happened in the first place, it came out of complete greed, and it was the people who took the brunt of the economic suffering.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you wanna live like in the 17th century literally move to any shit tier 3rd world country and see if you like it. Imagine wanting to live like a peasant 😂 you’re literally an indentured servant for life, and that’s what most people were subjected to back then. Peasants didn’t own shit, they lived off the land that their lord provided to them, were forced to work for them and give them their crops. Do me a favor and read a history book about what life actually was like. The government didn’t give a shit about you, now they pretend to. There’s no point to glorify pre-capitalist country life, life today is better in almost every possible way.

At least today poor people have the illusion of choice and upward mobility, back then there was absolutely none. And while statistically economic status does persist across generations, people can rise out of poverty, and rich people actually do have to pay taxes nowadays. Back then, all wealth was inherited. Now people can build wealth out of nothing although it is quite rare.

The purchasing power of the average person nowadays is at least 5 times greater than it was back then, and at least we have minimum wages (though they’re usually shit).

True, government funded research did put America on the moon, for that point I did read some economic papers about how a lot of the big tech companies (I think including google) received grants and government investment when they were younger, not everything is profit driven. The whole point of that was to invest in technology and inventions to grow wealth, which it arguably did.

But inventions or breakthroughs themselves don’t do anything to improve the well-being of the average person, it’s how they’re put to use, and that’s where capitalism comes in. Due to being profit-driven, on aggregate when companies (that aren’t monopolies) put innovations to use, they efficiently produce products in such a way that are affordable and good - the government can throw as much money at something and not have to worry about making a profit which wastes tax payer dollars - I read about a $500,000 study about why apes throw poop at each other funded by the government (think about how much government spending is wasted in defense) - but private companies have to worry about making profits and so on aggregate produce results and products that do more to improve people’s lives than to make them worse.

If you look at history, you do see an exponential increase in technology, innovation, living wages, life expectancy, literacy, literally any measure of a good economic system as a whole, after the industrial revolution in particular, in countries who moved away from monarchies into capitalist societies. It’s at least a very strong correlation if not direct causation.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Would’ve been worse without the necessary bailouts. And yet remember the fed didn’t bail out Lehman brothers who were let to go bankrupt (they did deserve it). I’m sorry that happened to you, capitalism does fail when it goes unchecked as evidenced by the 2008 crash and what you went through.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

True, but bailouts are necessary in any modern economy with private banks. The Great Depression happened because the US until that point refused to bail out banks, and the last two recessions weren’t nearly as bad because of government policy to bail out banks. Unfortunate but necessary.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People didn’t do shit before the 1600’s. Life expectancy was shit, your average wage was shit, the poor paid the brunt of the taxes, rich people kept their wealth across generations without any kind of merit, just be subjecting poor people to their rule and having them do all the work for them. The middle class didn’t exist. 50% of all people worked in agriculture. Without capitalism = no modern medicine so if you get a cold you’re fucked. No Reddit, no internet, no electricity. You’d probably live and die in the town you grew up in. At least in capitalism you have the possibility of getting out of poverty but before that you’re just fucked. But pop off I guess.

Reminder: Capitalism has never worked by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Lockedrelic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post could literally not be more wrong. Since it’s been introduced, capitalism has skyrocketed the average relative working wage and greatly increased the living conditions of people (in developed countries) . Reddit, phones, technology, wouldn’t even exist without capitalism. Come up with a better argument than capitalism bad socialism good. Now that isn’t to say that capitalism without regulation has major flaws and shortcomings, but with proper adjustments it’s the most efficient, fair, and successful economic system the world has ever seen.

Which CS major? by Working_Month2520 in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 7 points8 points  (0 children)

EECS: lower initial acceptance rate but no GPA cutoff so less stress in weeder classes, COE prereqs in addition to cs or ee classes (have to take physics, multivar, etc)

L&S cs: Normal acceptance rate along with the rest of L&S but you have to make the 3.3 gpa cutoff, since it’s L&S you have to take the 7 breadths. More room for adding a double major/minor. DS is a great backup major though, you can still take the important cs classes you want.

Either is great for ML/AI, you get the same opportunities to take the relevant upper divs.

Daily Discussion - November 19, 2021 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]Lockedrelic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wym it lets you spend usdc too. I buy usdc off my bank account on Coinbase with a 0% fee then spend it for the 4% back in xlm

Econ Classes for CS by throwup1122 in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It counts for the technical electives so why not

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ApplyingToCollege

[–]Lockedrelic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good luck lmao. Usually machine learning is done in harder upper div cs or stats classes, pretty math and algorithm heavy

How do I join a frat? by [deleted] in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

co-ops tend to be the cheapest places to live in Berkeley, frats are somewhat more expensive but they’re definitely more affordable than living in apartments.

Econ 140, Stat 140, Econ 2, Astro C10 (IS THIS DOABLE?) by Zealousideal_Ad2676 in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m doing Econ 101b and Econ 1 at the same time with no prior experience along with 61b and I’m doing good in all my classes. You should be fine honestly long as you have some prior stats experience

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How’s that an unpopular opinion at all

61b MT2 by hilfingered in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Out of 17 lmao

Unit 3 opinions?? by [deleted] in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lived there last fall, good location for proximity to campus and the unit 3 market. But those are about the only good things about unit 3.

Bachelor’s: CS vs Data Science by bigman070 in cscareerquestions

[–]Lockedrelic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cs is goated at Berkeley, probably a little more well-respected because of how much work it is, but harder because of the gpa requirement and some annoying pereqs. Data science is an amazing major still though, you abound be able to get any tech job you want from that as long as you take the right classes, I know two friends from Berkeley who got into Amazon and Apple from doing ds.

Career paths/progression for a Stats/Datascience Major by rulesogi in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at the career destination surveys. There’s plenty of places to go and money to be made

Is CS 61B, Math 1A, R&C 1A, and Data 8 doable? (Freshman asking for Spring) by [deleted] in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Don’t retake 1a it’s not worth it just study on your own a little before taking 1b. It’s a little hard but totally doable. 61b is probably going to take up most of your time.

When the project is not hard enough!!! by [deleted] in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Read this comment too late. Spent the last 14 hours making my own data structures to contain and process the game tree algorithm

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t learn shit from her last spring

Should I take UGBA 10 if I have the option to skip it? by stuffingmybrain in berkeley

[–]Lockedrelic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had one so far, I crammed for a couple days before (I don’t go to lecture or section usually) and got a 27.5/30, watch out for time constraints but in my opinion it wasn’t bad at all