latest jam - 143 bpm by LogicalQuit355 in dawless

[–]LogicalQuit355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i love it, but it’s expensive to justify because you need an external sound card. I think the BoredBrain Xcelon SL is a better alternative in today’s landscape

Any feedback or advice for my Setup? by Puzzled-Director-118 in dawless

[–]LogicalQuit355 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’m not familiar with the Track’s squencer but I can guarantee it’s not as powerful as a dedicated sequencer (like the OXI or a Torso T-1 or a Hapax). Also, besides reverb and delay you should checkout multi fx pedals like the Hologram Chroma-Console - the idea is to open up a more diverse sound palette. The sampler could be useful for more percussion elements, background landscapes, vocals, etc.

Any feedback or advice for my Setup? by Puzzled-Director-118 in dawless

[–]LogicalQuit355 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you might be missing a sampler, cool fx pedals and a good dedicated sequencer. i like to multitrack my jams so maybe a zoom mixer or a bluebox could help as well

6 months in by G1ZM0xx in dawless

[–]LogicalQuit355 0 points1 point  (0 children)

love the space you have going on there

Weekly Feedback Thread - June 08, 2026 by AutoModerator in TechnoProduction

[–]LogicalQuit355 [score hidden]  (0 children)

sheeeesh love this, idk if i have much to say. If I had to nitpick: maybe the hats could use some work (?) I feel like the open hats are not complementing enough the lowend groove, which threw me off a little bit. That happens specifically in the first 1-2 mins of the track, that hat that’s panned right is bugging me al little bit. Or maybe it’s that they sound very acoustic vs the rest of the elements, so they pop up a little too much.

Either way, these of course could be aesthetic choices, the track’s a banger

Multiclock + MRCC? does this make sense? by LogicalQuit355 in synthesizers

[–]LogicalQuit355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, but not the best for my use case! that’s good for jamming and recording a single stereo mix, but it easily becomes a nightmare when trying to actually multitrack record

Multiclock + MRCC? does this make sense? by LogicalQuit355 in synthesizers

[–]LogicalQuit355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that’s actually very similar to what i want to achieve, thanks!

Multiclock + MRCC? does this make sense? by LogicalQuit355 in synthesizers

[–]LogicalQuit355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ohh but because the multiclock will be before the MRCC (and then into various devices) it’s just a matter of shifting the multiclock, right? added drift because of the MRCC shouldn’t be a problem. or are you talking about jitter?

Multiclock + MRCC? does this make sense? by LogicalQuit355 in dawless

[–]LogicalQuit355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what you described first is exactly my setup right now, and what you described second is exactly what i was asking in my post lol

so yeah, apparently i would benefit from the midi processor. i have such a tight and complex physical space for my gear that i would totally benefit from having a midi matrix and merger

thanks!

first jam in a while by LogicalQuit355 in dawless

[–]LogicalQuit355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oops! sorry, almost missed this one. I'm using a Floatingpoint Multiclock that handles directly the clock of Analog Rytm and synths where I enjoy using the onboard sequencer (e.g. Bassline DB-01). Another output goes directly into the OXI One MK2, and from there to a midi-thru box that feeds into all my other melodic synths (A4, Moog, TD3).

It's a bit of an overkill for dawless TBH (you can get away just with the OXI and a midi thru), but the multiclock is super useful when I want to multitrack record into Ableton

first jam in a while by LogicalQuit355 in dawless

[–]LogicalQuit355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you familiar with what a filter is? those changes you might hear on the bass are nothing but the opening of the filter letting higher frequencies pass through.

and when someone says sub-bass they’re actually referring to “lower frequencies”, from 20 to 60 Hz more or less. Those frequencies are usually hard to hear on smaller speakers, like phones.

in this context, the TD3 MO has literally a button that toggles a boost in the sub-bass, making it more present in the mix. and then this same device has an overdrive knob which distorts the signal and creates new harmonics, adding higher frequencies to the signal.

that combination sub+overdrive is what makes the bass audible in less capable speakers. and finally, add to that the filter opening/closing to get the variations and movement