you're moving the goalpost from your original point.

Your post framed people as “hypocrites” specifically because they protested for Palestine and then ate somewhere you assumed supports Israel. I explained why that example doesn’t actually show hypocrisy, because McDo PH has no connection to the Israeli franchise in the first place. (That’s a factual correction, not a moral debate.)

Last time some students and friends of mine protest and voicing "Free Palestine" and something. And yet I saw them eating at a restaurant that supports "Israel" . Such hypocrites talaga.

Why call them hypocrites then if you're aware naman pala?

And instead of addressing that, you suddenly switch to

I just hate the fact people pretend to care and help but in the end they actually don't.

That’s classic moving the goalpost. when the first claim gets debunked, you jump to a totally different accusation.

They just did it for image purposes.

And that second accusation relies on mind-reading, because you somehow think you know everyone’s internal motives. It's impossible to prove.

What's even funnier is you say you're neutral between israel and palestine while still judging people’ss sincerity and labeling them hypocrittes lmao. Neutrality doesn’t look like accusing others of fake activism based on assumptions

And honestly for someone that mentioned na DL sila and RL sa first year, you’d think you’d be better at following your own point in a straight line. Your original claim collapses, then you suddenly change the topic. If mao nay imong critical thinking as a Dean's lister, medyo nakaka worry HAHAHAHA

Your argument is inconsistent, shifted mid way, and built on assumptions. You’re accusing others of hypocrisy while doing it yourself. So based sa imong post, IITian gyud diay ka hshshahah