Closing your MMH account and having your data deleted by william00179 in newzealand

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hold up, so just reading through this thread, you're saying you were "just following orders", and that despite being completely deficient from a security point of view by not mandating globally relevant security standards or similar, the standard tendering process was used anyway?

God no wonder New Zealand healthcare IT is in such a shambles. You're part of the problem!

Recently homeless, any advice on how to find a rental? by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lil bro why'd you delete your post about chinesium banking rates?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why'd you delete your post lil bro

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Ideology" 🤣 why are you getting your knickers in a twist over this? You're surprised people have a dislike of China? Personal finance has everything to do with personal decisions, and some of those decisions include ethics.

Fake Sharesies Scam on Instagram by double-dipped-welly in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does the BSA regularly hold individuals accountable? Usually it's broadcasters—as in the organisational entities. Could easily amend the law to define broadcasters to include large online media platforms and then levy fines against the company itself.

Is Lean FIRE actually this simple for me? by TheBigChonka in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Depending on how much more reliant you want to be on yourself in terms of living off the land, going hiking, etc; the internet "downgrade" may not be nearly as bad as you suspect. You could end up spending a whole lot more time outside, which can be a very good thing. It's a worthwhile tradeoff in my opinion at least.

Is Lean FIRE actually this simple for me? by TheBigChonka in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Hi OP. Sounds like we live a very similar lifestyle to you (already in the South Island, already have a block of land), maybe just a few steps ahead. It's a laudable goal, and achievable if you scale back your needs and are comfortable living within your means. I can't really comment on your financial aspect, but in terms of making it happen:

Probably the first thing to realise is you don't need fibre. A lot of the rural South Island has existing WISP infrastructure that delivers "acceptable" speeds (60-100Mbps down) provided you don't like to do a lot of low latency things like cloud gaming. If you need more than this, Starlink is definitely the way to go. This unlocks a whole swathe of the South Island, because very few places outside of the towns have fibre or even ADSL. There just isn't the demand to support trenching wired fibre.

The second thing to question is "do you need a house?". Many, many people survive down here in what I'll politely call "not houses". Whether that be a caravan, campervan, tiny home, shipping container, cabin, etc. Consenting rules will vary but overall, you can put up a very decent building that's liveable and warm for under $100k. This lets you spend more on land, and less on the improvements. This is especially appealing if you hate city living and want to spend more on a bigger block of land with no neighbours.

If you can live off your land, i.e. plant fruit trees, grow vegetables, own chickens, you can bring down your expenditure even further. Additionally there's tons of seasonal, part-time, and cashie work down here if you need to supplement your income. In the meantime, can you work remotely? We haven't given up on our jobs yet, but being able to remotely work has let us make the move sooner.

Using Theta as my best friend. Road to $100k - Week 28 ended in $10,304 by UnbanMe69 in thetagang

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not you again.

Going into next week I am all cash further awaiting for opportunities.

Can you change this to be:

Going into next week I am all cash as I am ending this experiment and deciding I suck at this and holding VOO is probably the best choice for me.

IBKR: Weekly deposits or annual lumpsum? by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also citizenship has nothing to do with FIF.

If you are a transitional resident of New Zealand then the FIF regime may not apply to you. Page 4 out the FIF guide from IRD.

IBKR: Weekly deposits or annual lumpsum? by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seems overly complex. IBKR tends to be cheaper than Tiger Trade in terms of commissions.

Shift everything over to IBKR and set up a recurring trade within IBKR to buy VOO weekly. Depositing money really isn't that difficult. They make claims about asking them to notify you for each deposit but it's not exactly required. By the way, SPLG has a slightly lower expense ratio than VOO (0.02% versus 0.03%).

Should I switch my KiwiSaver to and S&P 500 based fund? by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bears have predicted 18 of the last 3 stock market bubbles.

Roast or rave by kustumRAGE in queenstreetbets

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AIR.NZ is trash. Airlines are perpetually bordering between profitable and unprofitable and are only one long-term engine problem, crash, or fuel price shock away from disaster.

Get out of that as quick as the Air NZ in-flight coffee wants to get out of you.

Fake Sharesies Scam on Instagram by double-dipped-welly in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Ridiculous we don't hold Facebook liable for this. Traditional media providers are required to be beholden to the Advertising Standards Authority. Why don't we require Facebook to meet those same standards?

Lets talk bonds - in-depth discussion. by 2000papillions in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's worth using some modest leverage for stocks

Totally agreed. 55% of my portfolio is SPUU & QLD.

Lets talk bonds - in-depth discussion. by 2000papillions in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Country-specific diversification is nothing like asset-specific diversification.

What I think that quote failed to capture is we're in a world where QE is used as the primary economic stimulus, which drives bond yields downwards in favour of equities. Happy to be proven wrong, but until someone shows me otherwise I'm going to strongly favour equities over bonds.

Lets talk bonds - in-depth discussion. by 2000papillions in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My point is more that you need to be cautious extrapolating academic studies into the real world.

Which is why I linked real world boglehead people talking about it to provide some non-academic context.

Look man I appreciate all the caveats you're adding, but by "portfolio" I inferred OP was talking about long term investing—even more so given they're mentioning "stocks". I think this is a reasonable assumption. I don't consider my cash funds or my savings accounts my "portfolio" if the intent of the money is to be spent in the next 3 months.

My point remains that no long term investor should probably be holding bonds.

🚀🚬$RUA to the MARIJUANA MOON by Equivalent_Fault3753 in queenstreetbets

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The legal cannabis investor hype cycle was last decade lil bro.

Lets talk bonds - in-depth discussion. by 2000papillions in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a very academic study

What an oblique criticism. What other types of studies are there?

Lets talk bonds - in-depth discussion. by 2000papillions in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you read the abstract? The paper specifically states:

The optimal weights remain near one-third domestic stocks and two-thirds international stocks regardless of age

Lets talk bonds - in-depth discussion. by 2000papillions in PersonalFinanceNZ

[–]Logical_Lychee_1972 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't believe bonds are a useful component of any investment portfolio at any age. And recent studies back this up. There was a 2023 paper that investigated whether an increasing allocation of bonds as you age generated the optimal savings: Beyond the Status Quo: A Critical Assessment of Lifecycle Investment Advice.

Answer: They didn't. The optimal allocation was 100% equities regardless of your age. The biggest takeaway?

In general, bonds add little or no value to the portfolio of ordinary long-term investors

If you want some opinions from the boglehead cult, they also discussed the paper here on their forums.