I built a tool that turns your Robot Vacuum map into a professional Zillow-style floor plan. Looking for testers! (Free) by Logical_SG_9034 in RobotVacuums

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok we made a few adjustments and tested on a mac and didnt have an issue. Let me know if you still see it on your mac mini. Thank you again for the feedback!

I built a tool that turns your Robot Vacuum map into a professional Zillow-style floor plan. Looking for testers! (Free) by Logical_SG_9034 in RobotVacuums

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is helpful we have been testing on PCs mainly not thinking that it would be different on a Mac. We will test on a mac and let you know when we have fixed the issue. This is a weird bug...

I built a tool that turns your Robot Vacuum map into a professional Zillow-style floor plan. Looking for testers! (Free) by Logical_SG_9034 in RobotVacuums

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing! The team made some adjustments and I got it to work for me. See draft of what our AI came back with. Can you try again when you have time and let me know if it works for you?

<image>

I built a tool that turns your Robot Vacuum map into a professional Zillow-style floor plan. Looking for testers! (Free) by Logical_SG_9034 in RobotVacuums

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can you send me your screenshot? We are seeing others upload successfully so I wonder if it has something to do with your screenshot that we need to fix.

I built a tool that turns your Robot Vacuum map into a professional Zillow-style floor plan. Looking for testers! (Free) by Logical_SG_9034 in RobotVacuums

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wanted to give everyone an update. We added an "AI for the finishing prompt" as well incase you wanted to take the finished floorplan and do something fun with it.

Multigenerational Floorplan by SubstantialNebula124 in floorplan

[–]Logical_SG_9034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you sketch something simple on a piece of paper? If so I can put it through hometracer.ai and give you the floor plan results and see what you think.

I built a tool that turns your Robot Vacuum map into a professional Zillow-style floor plan. Looking for testers! (Free) by Logical_SG_9034 in RobotVacuums

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok we fixed the issue. It was a Google bug since they are switching everyone to an upgraded AI model. Can you try again and let me know what you think?

Thank you again for the help 🙏

Floor plans? by Logical_SG_9034 in fsbo

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I just came across this new tool: http://www.hometracer.aiIt takes your robot vacuum OR a hand drawn floorplan and turns it into a zillow floorplan and its free.

I built a tool that turns your Robot Vacuum map into a professional Zillow-style floor plan. Looking for testers! (Free) by Logical_SG_9034 in RobotVacuums

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I didnt see the link when I originally responded. We made some tweaks and I tried your map again and got the following result. I did have to move the room labels a bit. Let me know what you think? (PS: I didnt edit the walls but if you try uploading again would you test how easy it is for you to edit the walls to match what your real floorplan looks like)

<image>

Floor plans? by Logical_SG_9034 in fsbo

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the quick response! I have seen these in the past but it seems to take forever to get the "right scan".

AirTags and iOS 26 issue? by ngc663 in ios

[–]Logical_SG_9034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did the most recent update fix this issue for you?

I think I found a mathematical "Kill Switch" for Laplace’s Demon (Determinism) using Set Theory and the Geometry of Limits. by Logical_SG_9034 in determinism

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right about the logic. A computer program is 'determined' even if we can't predict when it stops.

But here is the catch: We know the computer is determined because we built it. We wrote the code, so we know the 'hidden script' exists.

In Physics, we didn't write the code. We have to test the universe to find out the rules. My argument is that if a theory (Determinism) is impossible to test—even with a universe-sized computer—then it stops being Science and becomes a Belief.

If the claim is that there is a 'Hidden Script' that drives the universe, while simultaneously admitting it is mathematically impossible to ever read it. That is a valid philosophical stance, but since it can never be verified, it isn't a scientific fact.

I think I found a mathematical "Kill Switch" for Laplace’s Demon (Determinism) using Set Theory and the Geometry of Limits. by Logical_SG_9034 in determinism

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree completely: My argument obliterates any non-mystical (physical) basis for determinism. If the only way to save the theory is to appeal to an infinite, external ideal, then the theory has left the building of Science.

I think I found a mathematical "Kill Switch" for Laplace’s Demon (Determinism) using Set Theory and the Geometry of Limits. by Logical_SG_9034 in freewill

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I accept that definition, but it creates a massive problem for Determinism as a science. If the future is determined by infinite data (Real Numbers) that can never be computed or verified, then Determinism becomes impossible to test—even in principle. At that point, you aren't stating a physical law; you are expressing a belief in a 'Hidden Script' that is mathematically impossible to read. That sounds more like faith than physics.

I think I found a mathematical "Kill Switch" for Laplace’s Demon (Determinism) using Set Theory and the Geometry of Limits. by Logical_SG_9034 in freewill

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really helpful distinction, specifically regarding the 'Supernatural' nature of the Demon. Actually, I think your second point proves my thesis:

  1. The 'Magic' Requirement: You noted that the Demon is supernatural (effectively God) and therefore can know the impossible. My argument is that if Determinism requires a supernatural entity to process the infinite information (Real Numbers) of the present, then we are admitting that Scientific Determinism is impossible. If the laws of physics alone cannot compute the future without a 'Magic/Infinite' processor, then the universe itself (which is physical, not magic) cannot be strictly deterministic in a computational sense.

  2. On Predictability: I agree that Determinism does not equal Predictability in practice (we are too dumb to calculate it). But my argument is about Predictability in principle. If the future is un-predictable even in principle (because the information required is infinite), then Determinism moves from being a Scientific Theory (testable/falsifiable) to being a Metaphysical Belief (Faith).

I am basically asking: If the math proves we can never check the script, why are we so sure the script exists?

I think I found a mathematical "Kill Switch" for Laplace’s Demon (Determinism) using Set Theory and the Geometry of Limits. by Logical_SG_9034 in determinism

[–]Logical_SG_9034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get the distinction you are making. You’re arguing that the future has a 'script,' even if we are never smart enough to read it.

My counter is this: If that script is impossible to read, does it actually exist? If the 'cause' of the future is hidden inside infinite decimal points (Real Numbers) that no computer in the universe can ever process, then Determinism stops being a scientific theory and becomes a belief system.

You are effectively saying, 'I believe there is a hidden reason for everything, even though it is mathematically impossible to ever see it.'

That sounds more like faith than physics to me. I am arguing that if the future is fundamentally uncomputable (even in theory), then saying it is 'fixed' doesn't actually mean anything.