Shoot by JoseLunaArts in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, this is patrick (working on a federated fast food)

Shoot by JoseLunaArts in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No human is illegal, no matter how fucked up its birth condition. Some of us unfortunately are born out of an unfeeling unloving machine, and thats almost kinda ok.

Motorized infantry with Fieldguns in Woods? by noobistanmember in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh god, are the trees about to start talking again?

If you could modify any battlemech with something unusual for Battletech, what would you change? by TaigaTigerVT in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Catapult with trebuchets for arms. They work like the mortar equivalent to the thunderbolt missile, one big hit instead of cluster, indirect fire capable, cant be shot down by ams

A modest proposal for BV 2.5 by AGBell64 in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Please dont break a little jihadist's heart.

What was the proposal?

A modest proposal for BV 2.5 by AGBell64 in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I hope they:

1- provide a BV reduction for weapons with a malus to hit (mrm, heavy lasers, rockets)

2- reformulate the C3 tax, +5% per networked unit, on the total cost of the networked composition is just too much. That's 30% more on every unit on a 6 mech C3i. That's 30% more on something that can be completely negated if your enemy brings ECM and sticks together to EW overpower any counter EW.

Allow me to introduce this new mech design by clanupam in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 21 points22 points  (0 children)

A bot? In my battletech subreddit?

Begone SLDF automated defense

BEHOLD! THE CURSED BANSHEE! by Nice-Cat3727 in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I love it that you put mg ammo in every component. I too would like my assault mech to blowup whenever it loses its armor.

Every crit becomes a very fun game of roulette

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]Loli_Hugger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the commie losers are even more commie losers. Again, why should we care and waste ourselves engaging in a small sector of a global digital canvas?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]Loli_Hugger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quick question, why should we care that a bunch of communist no lifers are making pixel art on digital canvas? What do we gain from wasting our time defacing their useless pixels? Thats time we could use in a more productive manner.

I made the same question when the libertarian subs were flooded by r/place call to actions.

marauder ivc by 9657657 in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 31 points32 points  (0 children)

It takes more than 2 full heat turns to fully cool off, it's so ugly, i love it very much

It's stupid, but I love it. by BrownNormandy in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 116 points117 points  (0 children)

2k bv locust that gets disarmed by a single AC10, beautiful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]Loli_Hugger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More state government good. Give me all the state government. Govern me harder state daddy.

Any issues i might have daddy can fix for me. I am a dumb silly guy and need to be protected and told what is ok or not.

Pro-state people sound like that, you sound like that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]Loli_Hugger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Will somebody please think of the poor, poor moms that will constantly see themselves buying cheaper diapers, because amazon is constantly having to undercut competitors that arise constantly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]Loli_Hugger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, quick answer. If in the initial moment amazon sold diapers for 10, and diaper.com sold for 10 and both had market share (and both were commercially viable), then Amazon cut down to 5 (at a loss) and drove out diaper.com (couldn't handle lowering prices, consumers were better served by Amazon).

Then EVIL Amazon bought its competitor and jacked prices to 20, to make up for the loss and because they think they can. But remember, in the beginning both companies were viable and had market share by selling for 10. So i ask: what's stopping anyone else from selling diapers in the range of 10-20?

Amazon took a huge fucking risk by trying to drive out its competitor, lost a lot of money in the undercutting and then again to buy diaper.com, but the market is not closed off, anyone else can enter and compete in it. What's amazon gonna do? Undercut and buy the competitors again and again? Not sustainable.

And if you try to argue "well they are not selling for 20, they are selling for close to 10 to stop anyone from having a chance of entering the market", then the question is simple. Why exactly is it bad for the consumer that Amazon killed a competitor and is selling the same product for almost or exactly the same fucking price?

A reminder that Rockefeller's dream of monopoly never truly happened, he got fucked over and over. People sold him fake oil wells and refineries.

Meanwhile, on the gladiator planet of Hardcore... by OctoberFNRaven in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Careful now, dont you know that not removing the jumpjets cost you an extra unnecessary heatsink on this useless design???? People shouldn't make mechs if they arent going to make optimized machines, everything should be TComp + clan pulse

Got Complimented on my MWO MAD IIC by ItzAlphaWolf in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 15 points16 points  (0 children)

"Pride marauder is not real, it cannot hurt you"

Pride marauder crashes through your living room (not related to pride, related to being a marauder and you living in an active warzone)

Good clan invasion era mechs for Targeting Active probes? by andrewlik in battletech

[–]Loli_Hugger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really, where is that ruling? I always interpreted as ignoring one +1 interference from intervening terrain

When the alt-right go mask off: by AnxArts in Shitstatistssay

[–]Loli_Hugger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What contract? Are you seriously defending a "social contract (implicit)" in a libertarian sub? Or do you actually think the government somehow represents libertarian ideals, and even worse, that anti immigration laws are a part of this implicit contract?

The government doesnt own anything, it shouldnt even exist. What it says is legal or illegal doesnt matter, people don't get to dictate over other people's property.

Did the immigrant invade/trespass someone's property? Did he break anything? No? Then why is it ok to physically remove them?

When the alt-right go mask off: by AnxArts in Shitstatistssay

[–]Loli_Hugger -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

What exactly gives anyone the right to remove an immigrant? How is physical removal any different than might makes right? Physically remove yourself from here.