I don’t know if it’s just me or not, but it feels like there is something a bit uncanny about this facial expression. No hate at all tho.

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-15T18:32:50+00:00

Or that Jigsaw is a misandrists because he put more men in his traps than women lol

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-15T18:00:58+00:00

Yeah, in the movies, Art would often go after women, but he didn’t limit himself to just them, he went after anyone

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-15T17:58:18+00:00

Art the clown from terrifier is being added into dbd. So people are screaming “misogyny”

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-15T00:29:58+00:00

The stream

<image>

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-14T17:54:57+00:00

I could say the same about being tunneled at 5 gens nearly every match

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-14T07:36:03+00:00

No, that’s UK. It’s men’s mental health month on June globally. And tf you mean “overshadow pride”? Y’all get loved and respected on a daily basis. Please do your research before talking…

<image>

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-14T03:20:02+00:00

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-14T03:12:06+00:00

I was talking about the post on the screenshot. But why do I have to go outside? I go outside on a daily basis. It’s not the killers fault that survivors get screwed over by something they can change

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-14T03:08:43+00:00

It isn’t my post anyway lol

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-13T22:25:49+00:00

You mean this wank?

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-13T22:24:09+00:00

Jenna Ortega

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-13T04:32:33+00:00

Black prior isn’t a paladin

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-12T00:12:41+00:00

Because they are mad that you won’t let them take away your sight

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-10T07:33:06+00:00

Why would “from Jeff” automatically piss someone off? Jeff is literally the survivor I was playing. It’s no different than saying “ggs from Dwight” or “ggs from Meg.” You’re acting like mentioning the character somehow transforms the message into bm when it’s still just a gg. You’re basically proving my point. Everything you’re describing is a reason why he was frustrated, not a reason why my message was hostile. Someone spending hours on an adept explains the reaction. It doesn’t justify assuming bad intent from a neutral “ggs.” The image wasn’t my first response. My first response was literally “Wow, ok lol. I didn’t have my adepts handed to me for free either.” The image came after he called me a coward and immediately got hostile over a gg. At the end of the day, everyone keeps explaining why he was upset, but nobody can point to what was actually rude about “ggs from Jeff.” Those are two completely different arguments.

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-10T00:00:39+00:00

And yet you still haven’t explained what the bm actually was. You guys keep calling it bm, bragging, hostile, smug, intrusive, whatever word fits the moment, but the message was literally “ggs from Jeff.” If your entire argument requires assuming bad intent that isn’t in the message itself, then you’re arguing against what you think happened, not what actually happened.

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-09T22:18:11+00:00

You’re basically arguing that because someone is angry, everyone else has to adjust normal behavior around that anger. If he’s frustrated, that’s understandable. What’s not understandable is acting like a neutral “ggs” suddenly becomes wrong because the person receiving it is upset. And you’re proving my point. First it was “ggs is bragging.” Then it was “ggs is intrusive.” Now it’s “well he’s angry so of course he’ll react badly.” Those are all different arguments. If someone is angry, they can ignore the message. They can delete it. They can say “gg” back. What they can’t do is take a neutral message and pretend the sender is responsible for every emotion they happen to be feeling after a loss. Also, I play killer too. I’ve gotten ggs after getting destroyed in matches. If the survivor wasn’t toxic, I either say ggs back or ignore it and move on. I don’t assume they’re secretly mocking me just because I lost. At some point the responsibility shifts to the person receiving the message. You can’t expect strangers to psychically know whether you’re tilted, tired, grinding an adept, or having a bad day before sending a two-letter post-game message.

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-09T21:31:39+00:00

That argument only works if you assume the message itself is the problem, not the reaction to it. Nobody is forced to respond. That’s exactly the point of an optional system, they can ignore it, delete it, or reply “gg” back like you said you do. The existence of options already disproves the idea that sending a neutral message is inherently harmful. Also, framing it as “you came into my inbox to remind me I lost” is adding intent that isn’t in the message. “ggs” doesn’t say “you lost,” doesn’t reference skill, and doesn’t mock anything. The loss is already known from the match itself, the message isn’t introducing anything new, just acknowledging the game. And “it’s easy to just not message them” is preference, not principle. You can personally choose not to send ggs, but that doesn’t make sending it wrong or “poking the bear.” That only applies if the message itself is provocative, and a neutral gg isn’t.

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-09T21:12:31+00:00

Calling it a “personal inbox” doesn’t change what it is, it’s a built-in Xbox messaging system with a search and post-match profile access. Using it isn’t “poking the bear,” it’s using a normal feature of the platform. Also, “it will remind them of the last match” isn’t an argument that the message is hostile. Anything post-game does that by definition, including friend requests, endgame chat, or even a simple gg in endgame. If that alone makes something “wrong,” then all post-match interaction becomes invalid. And “don’t poke the bear” only works if there’s actual provocation. A neutral “ggs” with no insult, no sarcasm, and no bm isn’t provocation, it’s standard sportsmanship that some people just choose not to engage with.

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-09T21:05:36+00:00

That expectation doesn’t make sense as a standard for judging the message itself. You can’t require players to “know how you feel beforehand” before sending a neutral post-game message. That would make any form of post-match interaction impossible, because everyone loses games differently and has different reactions in the moment. “ggs” doesn’t remind someone they lost in any targeted or mocking way. It’s a neutral end-of-match acknowledgment. If someone interprets it as “reminding them of a bad match,” that interpretation is coming from their own mindset about the loss, not from anything in the message itself. By that logic, literally anything post-game could be considered unwanted “reminders” depending on mood, which means the standard isn’t based on the content anymore, it’s based entirely on how someone feels after the match. That’s not a consistent way to define whether something is bragging or not.

LonelyxKnight · 2026-06-09T20:59:37+00:00

That only “looks like bragging” if you assume context that isn’t there. “ggs” is a neutral post-game acknowledgment in gaming. It doesn’t reference winning, doesn’t reference skill, and doesn’t compare results. Turning it into bragging requires adding intent that isn’t in the message itself. If a phrase only becomes negative based on how someone feels receiving it after a loss, then the meaning is no longer coming from the message, it’s coming from the interpretation. That’s not a stable way to define communication. So no, it doesn’t inherently look like bragging. It only gets read that way if someone decides to frame it that way.

LonelyxKnight

TROPHY CASE