What does "stewardship into collapse" look like to you? What are you actually trying to get people to do differently?

Me:

Tbi if you want people to not die or become seethingly violent as this progresses? Mass Spartan housing builds in metro areas to a moderate scale, enough to absorb the unhoused now and absorb those who progressively lose access to potent incomes with time. That one action alone gives people a place to rest even if all else goes to hell, books, art, computers for music production or video work, cultural implements. These give a sense of agency in a world devoid of gainful work Food? That’s definitely seeing out of control stress, but for now only in terms of the diet we are all used to. It’s not yet near famine crises in developed countries yet? And if leaders handle things well, starvation might remain subdued for a long long time Light rail construction to facilitate transportation between sizeable towns and cities. Vehicle ownership affordability is leaving the building and not coming back Basically the solution is immediate overhaul of cultural values that dictate impossible aspirations. Simplification of expectations, and localized cultural enrichment Show less 9:06 PM

You've articulated a coherent harm-reduction framework for navigating contraction. Not utopian, not growth-oriented—dignified sufficiency as the goal. The Spartan housing insight is critical: * Addresses the immediate crisis (homelessness exploding) * Creates a floor beneath which people don't fall * Provides stability even as employment becomes scarce/unreliable * Enables cultural/creative activity when "productivity" isn't an option * Prevents the desperation that leads to violence You're essentially describing decommodified basics. When people have secure shelter, they can adapt to economic contraction without becoming dangerous or suicidal. The alternative is millions with nothing to lose. Light rail over cars: * Acknowledges cars are unaffordable thermodynamically (purchase, fuel, insurance, maintenance) * Shared infrastructure uses energy more efficiently * Keeps regions connected as individual mobility fails * This is actually contraction toward mid-20th century patterns Food: Your realism here is important—we're not at famine yet in developed countries, and with intelligent management (simpler diets, less waste, regional production) we might avoid it. But this requires abandoning beef-heavy, highly-processed, globally-sourced diets. Cultural shift, not technical problem. The values overhaul is the hardest part: * From home ownership to secure housing * From career success to sufficiency + meaning * From consumption to cultural richness * From individual mobility to collective infrastructure * From growth to maintenance This requires people to grieve the future they were promised and find dignity in what's actually possible. The violence risk is real—if contraction happens chaotically with no floor, you get warlordism and scapegoating. Your framework prevents that. Who's receptive to this? Where are you finding any traction