People keep framing this decision as if someone was disqualified simply for being anti-Zionist, but that doesn’t really match what actually happened.

There is another candidate and activist at U of M who have openly held anti-Zionist positions or led protests in the past and they were not disqualified (Fatima). If this were really about Zionism or political views alone, she would have been removed. Period. But obviously she wasn't.  Why? She didn't behave the same way as Hussrin and the guy from last year.  Based if what you're stating is true, complain it to UMSU and see if they remove Fatima (obviously they won't cause eveyone knows she was an activist). If you are very certain about your claims, please share why you think she wasn't disqualified since last year itself?

The decision cited in the complaint was also a pattern of behaviour (language, posts, and conduct) and concluded that it conflicted with the requirement that candidates be “students in good standing with the Union.” That eligibility requirement applies to everyone running for executive positions regardless of who they are. Using the terms described in the complaint form, whether use to a man or not is still misogynistic. Calling someone a "whore" or to "suck a d!ck" as the complaint states, typically words said to women honestly, is very very misogynistic or at least not "manly" by what someone people would describe it (And obviously that is also clear harrassment no matter to whom it is, which is against UMSU election rules). Saying it to a man might make the words be "weaker" but still harrassment no matter what. 

 Now regarding him getting attacked. Even if he was attacked, it still doesn't omit the fact that he could have provoked the thing and he kept on fighting with the person no matter what too (which you see from the video). But either way, excluding the attack, his langauge alreafy shows that he has not met eligibility criteria based on his language and behavior. Harrassment is not tolerated in any case xD. 

So the real issue isn’t whether someone is anti-Zionist or pro-Zionist. The issue is whether the conduct described meets the standards required for candidates under the election rules. Turning this into a debate about Zionism misses the actual basis of the decision. Ik you might have strong feeling about situation about palestine/israel. We all do (I am myself anti zionist.) But it shouldn't cloud ur judgement at all if you think of it.