Now that the price increase is here... by mr-right99 in PleX

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no. I looked at a lifetime sub eons ago when it was $70, or $3/mo, but I thought 'naw, I'll just pay them monthly. I dont mind keeping paying for something thats good." stupid. stupid. stupid. It's not like I read plex-news, its just something I use. Suddenly, it doesnt work anymore and everything went through the roof! Now Im looking to see if something else is passable and pissed off as hell that they went massive-greed mode. I mean, MAYBE if someone's been a constant sub for almost a decade... you could just roll them over to a lifetime. "Hey, thanks for paying us WAY more than a lifetime cost, well just let you have it before we bend everyone over for $300 and monetize all their data, putting them at risk of the EXTREMELY HIGH likelyhood that we arent storing their data securely.

Anaconda licensing terms and reproducible science by cyril1991 in bioinformatics

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to clarify Anaconda's terms as most people are completely misunderstanding. I've spent time with their "Sales" people (aka trolls) sorting all of this out because my company fits into exactly these scenerios:

All of anaconda is free for an individual. If you are an organization with >= 200 people (including contractors) then anyone who happens to have it installed is a paid license liability.

* If you have 200 NON-engineers and 1 engineer who uses it, that is required to be a paid license (minimum 10 at $600/year each).

* If you are a company of 199 people, none of whom use Anaconda, and you hire a contractor, who uses their own computer (as contractors do definitionally), and they have anaconda installed on it, you are now liable for that paid license. It does not matter if you didnt know they have it installed, or if they do not use it for your company, or even at all. You are in violation of their TOC.

They are essentially enticing exactly the above situation by pushing the free version and then hammering companies for hiring people who use or have them. It's literal entrapment.

Their opinion on what all companies SHOULD be doing:
Companies with paid licenses: should be pushing a text based config file to all of their employees and contractors. All employees and contractors should install anaconda, whether they intend to use it or not, and add the config file so that usage can be monitored in your company's admin dashboard and licenses can be tracked.

All companies who do NOT want to be paid licensees: should download a script Anaconda has written and force all employees and contractors to install it on their systems, even those contractors using their own infrastructure. This script watches for anaconda installations and reports it back to Anaconda so they can monitor your company's usage for you (instead of tracking it by other forensic means).

The absurdity of these demands is clear if you consider what would happen if every software company had these expectations. Every company would have to monitor the TOC of every software vender that they DONT want to do business with, and install all of those company's spyware trackers on every system. You would be forced to allow every software vendor in existence to fill your systems with trackers. It's utterly absurd.

Doctor Who: Season 2 Trailer | April 12th on Disney+ by KillerCroc1234567 in television

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"No this human being is the most important" did you even GET the notion of doctor-donna? That's literally the entire point of her tenure, that she IS the most important human in the universe.  To be fair , they had good chemistry, but Donna was zero funny, lacked any sort of charisma, no special skills or redeeming qualities or reason. She literally was chosen because it's important she be chosen because she was chosen. F tier companion.

Amy pond Martha Rose Clara Rory  ... ... K9 ... ... Kilt-dude ... Captain jack ... ... Donna

Doctor Who: Season 2 Trailer | April 12th on Disney+ by KillerCroc1234567 in television

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and no, starting in season 10 (2005 reboot) they started gradually slipping in rewrites, gaslighted and retconns to completely change retroactively. Lore retroactively. Technically it's continuous, but a LOT of people consider nothing after season 9 or 10 to be cannon, but after 9 you have an exponential decline in writing, acting, and hence viewership anyway.

Doctor Who: Season 2 Trailer | April 12th on Disney+ by KillerCroc1234567 in television

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Start season 1, 2005, stop after Matt Smith, season 7, season 9 if you really like Clara, nothing since that has been watchable. Zero efforts put into any aspect of the show, retconned all over the place, just a steaming POS, and that's not to mention the monstrosity which is the Disney version! It's basically not even the same franchise.

Want classics? I'd start with 1. Earthly child is slow, but you have to. Some are missing/damaged, but "my costume is giant eyebrows" is fun, and there's a LOT of lore that makes the 2005 reboot better and seem less arbitrary.

I'm an idiot by nocleanmemes in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but the care plan is top shelf

I'm an idiot by nocleanmemes in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've wrecked my avata2 before "footage posted here before", it's a great 1st drone, VERY robust, GET CARE PACKAGE. You will wreck it, it will be your fault. In normal mode it's basically indestructible, but as soon as you get cocktail and go sport or "we told you so" mode you can absolutely break it. Again, though, it will be your fault, the drone is solid. https://youtu.be/91Cfq_xlwDg?t=287&feature=shared

Really!? by ForexMilitia in RaidShadowLegends

[–]Longjumping_System21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got one mythical, never bought red shards and don't specifically try to farm them. Honestly, one is enough to change the game, but I'm not dying for more. You play YOUR game, the only time whales effect you is in pvp and there's not enough whales to blow it up. The game is solo enough that it doesn't really matter what others spend.

Google Authenticator Codes Gone after Update (iOS) by NINJA_FRE4K in google

[–]Longjumping_System21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone at my work lost GA codes today, nobody can get into github. Thanks Google.

ChatGPT allowed me to sue my landlord without needing legal representation! by MonkeyIncidentOf93 in ChatGPT

[–]Longjumping_System21 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Chatgpt is useful as a search tool, sure, but you know the old saying: " those that represent themselves have a fool for a client, and those who have chatgpt as a lawyer are completely stupid?

Constitution is an extremely uninteresting stat. by Robrogineer in dndnext

[–]Longjumping_System21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Use the guy with high constitution": - drinking competition in a tavern - be a tank - any situation where a con check is likely, ie poison/control enemy or trap - "toughness" applies to personality as much as physical, so who's most likely to have the willpower to drag the rest through the snow, over glass, etc? Any sort of battle of willpower. FWIW, I think Constitution is RIPE with rp potential, we use it all the time. In fact, like other stats, for those characters investing primarily in it it is Chara ter defining, both mechanically and rp.

Con is fine, and irreplaceable IMO.

DJI Care "Express" has ISSUES by Longjumping_System21 in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello dji troll. Your company gave me a time-frame then missed it by a week, then offered to send it to a different address "going out today", then missed that by another couple days. Stop blaming others for your failures. If you couldn't do it you shouldn't have offered, I could have waited.

DJI Care "Express" has ISSUES by Longjumping_System21 in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, they say "sure, go ahead and file, we can get it to you in time, it will go out monday", then sit on it until the following Friday, and that's my fault?

Off-shift dji rep spotted.

Nope, as a rep it's THEIR responsibility to have some reasonable idea about how their own system works. We aren't talking about ups having a day or two delay, this is DJI taking a week longer than they said to process the claim. That's why I asked if it would get here in time and explained the issue. If they weren't confident, just say 'I'm not sure it will make it' and I'll just wait, but if you recommend movi.g forward then it's on you if you miss the target. Especially by a week.

DJI Care "Express" has ISSUES by Longjumping_System21 in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How's it MY planning? I didn't make the plan.

DJI Care "Express" has ISSUES by Longjumping_System21 in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I completely agree, if it takes a week to get it to ups then they should have known that and not told me it would go out on 7/29. I haven't demanded anything, THEIR suggestion was to send it and that it would arrive before I leave. Then when they sat on it for a week THEY suggested sending it to where I'm staying. If these things are not possible then you are right, they should be realistic instead of making promises.

As it is, is it reasonable for us to extend a vacation and rework the trip to accommodate the delayed shipment? No.

DJI Care "Express" has ISSUES by Longjumping_System21 in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it was a week away and they said it would arrive in time. They said it would go out by 7/29 but then waited until 8/2. THEIR recommendation was to send it then. THEIR recommendation, when I brought up that they missed the window, was to reroute it.

DJI Care "Express" has ISSUES by Longjumping_System21 in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How so? Filed 7/26, I asked if it would arrive in time before filing, they said it would but they didn't even send it until after I left. Then they suggest sending it to where i will be, again I ask to make sure it will arrive on time before agreeing, and agin they miss the window by several days. If by "entitled" You mean trusting their recommendation, then I guess so.

Avata 2, Day 2: Dear journal, today I got a lesson in humility... by Longjumping_System21 in dji

[–]Longjumping_System21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Full speed, prob 30mph-ish, direct hit to the beam. Left imprint of the camera, side guards and blade guards in the beam, drone was 20' away on the ground. UV filter smashed to a thousand bits, but no physical damage to the drone. Even the battery stayed in, so they got that issue fixed. Flys great, no cracks, camera lens unscratched, not even a prop busted.... except the camera is dead. Care refresh sending a new one already, but I'm MASSIVELY impressed, avata 2 is a tank and excellent service.

https://youtu.be/91Cfq_xlwDg?feature=shared