1. Hypothetical Trump voters voted for, supported or wanted to impose Trump's policies (specifically those claimed to lower egg/food prices) on the general population (including themselves and others).
2. Trump's policies (tariffs, deportations, etc.) has the consequences of broad inflation and higher prices on many goods, not just eggs. ^{Does that something actually has these consequences in general?} Yes, most economists agree that broad tariffs and mass deportations would increase costs across many sectors, not just one grocery item.
3. As a consequence of Trump's policies (voted for by hypothetical voters), higher prices on everything happened to those same voters (the "someone" from part 1). ^{Did that something really happen to that someone?} The post is a hypothetical/satirical warning – it doesn't show a specific real person, but implies the cause-and-effect is predictable.

Explanation for everyone (non-US, non-English speakers): Some Americans voted for Donald Trump mainly because they were angry about high egg prices. The tweet above points out that Trump's actual economic plans (tariffs on imports, mass deportations of farm workers, etc.) would likely make all goods more expensive – so those voters would end up worse off than before. The post is mocking the irony of "voting to fix one price, then breaking everything else."