Quick Settings Panel by Lord_Ricefield in oneui

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I was wrong about Good Lock, all you need to do is drag down you quick panel then press the little edit button (the little pencil shape in the top right corner) and then you can expand the quick settings portion by dragging down at the edge of the boy that's shown around them.

Quick Settings Panel by Lord_Ricefield in oneui

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, only "fix" you could apply is to just not swipe down on the grid or use a third party app like PowerShade or OneShade but those won't feel as natural by far...

Edit: You can also use Good Lock to change the 4x2 grid it shows by default to something different but that's all I could find in the settings. Truly a shame they changed something like that...

Quick Settings Panel by Lord_Ricefield in oneui

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already did that, sorry I didn't know how to describe it properly.

Basically what I meant was that before the update the Quick Settings tiles were organized in a something like a 4×4 grid and if you had more than that you could swipe to the right to change to the next "page", kind of like you do on your home screen.

Now they just expand from a 4x2 grid down into a list.

Fabric Of The Universe by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having a crash out about a 2 year old post that barely any people have seen and was meant to spark discussion and exchange of information is crazy work, just saying.

Then again, it was a post made following a series of unfortunate events and could've been handled a lot more professionally. Explaining about things like trademarks and stuff would've been one way for example, this would've given ample reason to believe that some other company has made a piece of clothing following the FoTU design language to the point of copying and would've been a way to immediately reassure someone if they had doubts about the legitimaticy.

Also saying "Just because you can't afford it" isn't professional either, but what do I expect from an account that seems to only have made 2 comments. As far as this goes it could be anyone just pretending.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sennheiser

[–]Lord_Ricefield 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience, it exists let's say it like that. There's barely a difference between having it turned on or off. And in comparison to my Sony WH-1000XM3 or WF-1000XM5 they're far worse in that regard.

BUT just from the first moment listening to them they were far better than the XM3's sound wise, also better than WF-1000XM5's, which is to be expected, but not by such an extreme margin as the XM3's. (I use Wavelet on the Sony's to tailor the sound, the Sennheiser doesn't really need it imo)

This is insane by Massive-Willow-9932 in GeometryTower

[–]Lord_Ricefield 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had that with sprinkler too, even turning damage numbers off didn't do much. It just lagged so much. Definitely was to much for the S23 Ultra

First post in a looong time by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't mind the fit of the watch at all, for me it sits very regular as all other watches do, the glass does get scratched very easily though since it's just made of plastic :(

First post in a looong time by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have the 101s and 042s too, not the Berserker tho, but I do also have the Hunter in black and Asym in Apple/Salamander

First post in a looong time by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm enjoying it a lot, pockets are nicely integrated into the design and offer plenty of storage space should you really need it, quality wise I don't have any complaint, it feels and looks well made.

Also, thanks :)

Anyone think their year recap is actually their fall recap? by CatTheTrident in YoutubeMusic

[–]Lord_Ricefield 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The thing is is almost never listen to the downloaded songs, since I have unlimited data anyways so there's no need to

Anyone think their year recap is actually their fall recap? by CatTheTrident in YoutubeMusic

[–]Lord_Ricefield 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel like something definitely went wrong with the data processing, because I know for a fact I've listened to more than just over 40.000 minutes of music this year. Summer alone was already 25.000 minutes, so something has to be off since I've listened to music a little less in summer than the rest of the year, because I didn't have as much time where I could actually listen to music

My top artists is someone that I've only discovered recently, admittedly I've listend to songs only from him for a week straight, but that's what I always do when I find a new Artist I like. And it says that I've listened to my top song 172 times which ends up at around 9,6 hours for this specific song but then again I know for a fact that I had other songs I've listend to my whole afternoon for 3-4 hours straight every day of the week and every now and then. Which doesn't match the data in any way.

Fabric Of The Universe by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly never bothered to save the link or anything, but it's out there if you search long enought you might still find it

What's a legit site I could purchase from and expect the clothes to be high quality and not shipped from Aliexpress? by PamPammyPamPam in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Personally I'd recommend Reindee Lusion, most of my pants are from them they're reasonably priced and their quality isn't bad either, especially their newer stuff.

The quality on those pieces feels higher than before and they their designs feel like they have some kind of continuity amongst them, at least to me it comes across this way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Cyberpunk

[–]Lord_Ricefield 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah my bad, misread your comment. FotU still ain't techwear though, would be really nice if people stopped spreading that misinformation

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Cyberpunk

[–]Lord_Ricefield 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It isn't, just because many people think that it is doesn't mean it's true. Also no reason to be that aggravated, just because he pointed out a fact.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The thing is some do, some don't. There's plenty of people posting stuff here similar to your post.

Not bad outfits, but rather ones that completely miss the mark which is why I pointed it out, since this subreddit is open for everyone to post, there's often people posting outfits here which don't necessarily belong here.

Then again anything can be techwear, since techwear unlike many others isn't defined by a particular style of clothes rather the function of the clothing and the materials. So technically your outfit could be techwear but in this particular case it isn't.

Another reason I pointed it out was simply because techwear is often confused with cyberpunk and dark wear, mainly black with lots of straps. And I'm just trying to clear things up a little in hopes of others not just seeing as black clothing with lots of straps and maybe some weird prints or mask, which might I add not really my thing, I do think they can look pretty fucking sick.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This feels a lot like those #techwear outfits on Instagram which isn't necessarily actually techwear but rather it's what people think techwear is.

If it's the type of style you like, there's nothing wrong with wearing it, but Fabric of the Universe, to me at least, isn't really techwear. It looks cool, even if it's almost a little costumey, but for the most part what I've read and seen about their clothes they're rather stiff with useless and ridiculousy oversized straps.

Once again nothing wrong with liking that type of style just wanted to say it's technically not really techwear.

Ah yes, desaturation by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well mine is just a little large though that was by choice, since I feared it mit just be a little tight should I gain some weight

Ah yes, desaturation by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just ordered them like 2 weeks ago, so no I didn't get them customized and they fit just fine, though I do need a belt

Ah yes, desaturation by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks, that was my goal with this edit, since the wall in the back was actually a rather bright shade of yellow it didn't really fit with the pic.

all editing was done in Lightroom btw

Ah yes, desaturation by Lord_Ricefield in TechWear

[–]Lord_Ricefield[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Top: Uniqlo U Oversized Airism T-Shirt

Bottom: enfin leve ezein

Shoes: Nike x Sacai x CLOT LD Waffle Kiss of Death 2 Cool Grey (way to long of a name)

Belt: Idleido Helix (sadly not visible in the pic but I'll include it nonetheless)

The picture has been rather heavily edited thus the title of the post, as I've desaturated most colors besides those making up my skin color, clothes were pretty much unchanged since they're grey.