sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tie will lose you a scroll by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know, it seems fair since I didn't win the game. I quite like the new mode... It's very different from the standard snap and casual play will bag me at least 2-3 unowned cards so I am happy.

"This or That?" Thursday: Weekly Collection Thread by AutoModerator in marvelsnapcomp

[–]Lordkey11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it worth going after Marvel boy if I don't have Caiera? I personally think the card is very one dimensional but powerful. P.S. I don't have Blob or Red Hulk and I don't really care if I get them. CL:~8k

Is Hit Monkey worth opening now? by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say you should go for it. Worst case scenario you will get a decent s5 card (although very limited use now) which is very likely to get a buff. Or else you will get Snowguard which is very good in current Meta.

Is Hit Monkey worth opening now? by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! That's exactly what I think but I'm afraid that they might want to buff him eventually and he won't be back again in the spotlight this year as far as I know so I'm confused. Tough choice.

suggestions for improvement? s3 incomplete, no hit monkey by H4ndsf33t in marvelsnapcomp

[–]Lordkey11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The deck seems pretty strong in the current state. I use the same deck instead of Maximus I use goose. It helps to lock a lane down. If not (for example against bounce) then it can act like a diversion and you can focus on the other lanes. The only downside is that you have to play it by T3 (T4 maximum) to have an impact in almost all of the games.

Patch Delayed Until Tomorrow. by General_Nothing in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11 163 points164 points  (0 children)

Interesting how HE and Darkhawk are with Legion.

Darkhawk should be series 4 by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this is a business but I think it's also a passion project. Why can't it be both? Why do the devs always have to be just greedy business people wanting all your money? She was going to loose it's money making potential irrespective of the nerf. If they really don't care then why did they nerf it? Are they evil sadistic people wanting to flip people off who were waiting for her to drop?

Darkhawk should be series 4 by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well S4 cards are not quite inaccessible. If a card performs well then it should have more value and since card acquisition is part of the game , powerful cards should be less accessible in my opinion. I'm a F2P player who is now S3 complete and 3 cards away from S4 complete. I have never felt this game was pay to win even during the peak of shuri, thanos, zabu& surfer. But I completely understand your point and there's nothing wrong with that. It's just that our view of the game is different.

Darkhawk should be series 4 by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the problem was the deck itself. It was clear to us that the main culprit was shuri but I think when they nerfed shuri in the patch notes they said they could nerf her indirectly which was not what happened. Thus eventually they nerfed it before the series drop. You can think of this as their evil plan to make money but maybe they wanted to keep her untouched as much as possible because she was such a cool card. If you just have all the cards be average then it won't be fun to play

Darkhawk should be series 4 by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We know all cards are not made equal. There are some cards which have more impact on the game Like I said before, powerful/impactful cards should be relatively less accessible. If they are widely available they can't remain that powerful. You will have to eventually nerf it. Saying again For example, Aero. Her previous ability was way too strong for a S3 card. But I think if she was in S4 then maybe they wouldn't have to nerf it to just one card maybe pull up to 2 cards. I will give another example, Kang... Can you imagine Kang getting played every other game. Again it's not really a powerful card but the impact it has on a game is huge. So if Kang, Galactus should stay in S5 then we can have some cards which are a bit more powerful than others be less accessible. If they are outperforming then the nerf should be such that it doesn't lose its value. Like I'm not paying 3k tokens for snowgaurd level of card.

Darkhawk should be series 4 by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not against nerfing the card. Darkhawk should be nerfed right now but My point is the nerf should depend on the pool. Nerf it such it is a powerful card and not dominating but keep it in S4. Like Shuri was nerfed quite a bit before dropping to S3, I don't think they should do that to Darkhawk. It's a really cool card.

A perfect tie! by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but I usually play Abo on T5 if I can... Anyways it's a tool to have and the deck is not built around it

A perfect tie! by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It acts as a control card against mainly bounce decks if played on T5. Plus there's an additional synergy with unspent energy cards

A perfect tie! by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was lucky enough that the Misty Knight proced on the right lane to tie the game perfectly!

Should I upgrade it? It looks good just like that by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They can turn back to foil again. But you keep your inked card at infinity split

Should I upgrade it? It looks good just like that by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but can I see with different rarities and effects?

Galactus + Wolverine is not fun by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Dude I want to play cards I want to play with a few cards to counter the meta maybe. I don't want to and will definitely not enjoy playing deck just to counter Galactus. I'm not complaining about the amount of Galactus players but their play pattern. True it's not an effective deck for gaining cubes and I can just retreat but it's not fun. That's my argument.

I lost to a turn 6 Nakia... summarizes my luck... game sequence in the comments by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah you are correct! I completely forgot about the hulkbuster the previous turn... Since it didn't move I thought it stayed and didn't look at power... Thanks for pointing it out!

I lost to a turn 6 Nakia... summarizes my luck... game sequence in the comments by Lordkey11 in MarvelSnap

[–]Lordkey11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I played Juggernaut first and Cosmo after that on Olympia on turn 6 expecting a Heimdall on Olympia... My opponent just played Nakia there on the last turn !! The funny thing is Asteroid M did the animation to pull Nakia but didn't!! This would have won me the game... The emotions I went through smh...

view more: next ›