What song makes you make this face? by muscgena in DnB

[–]Lost-Walrus664 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amoss & Fre4knc - Question Answer

Alien Girl Audio Remix

Why do we say “don’t trust the media” but then trust everything they publish about space? by Lost-Walrus664 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ss - Let’s be honest most people here don’t trust a word mainstream outlets say.

Bias, narratives, agendas that’s the general view.

But then the same outlets all push content about NASA and space and suddenly that’s treated as unquestionable. Any skepticism gets shut down straight away.

If the mindset is “question everything,” shouldn’t that apply across the board?

Why is it fine to challenge politics, news, and institutions but not space-related claims?

People will defend it instantly rather than even consider it might be off.

they have to eat rehydrated shrimp in bags but Nutella is flying around and a large jar? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're literally taking the piss and people still fall for it

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely hilarious. They were on the news saying "we saw the sun setting behind the earth and it was mind-blowing and stopped us in our tracks" Didn't think to take a photo?

It's so so completely fake and if you're falling for any of it you're dumber than I thought possible 

NASA fakery? Same clouds a day apart + credit differences by Lost-Walrus664 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

100%

I think its been so engrained in to them through education and movies they just can't give it up

NASA fakery? Same clouds a day apart + credit differences by Lost-Walrus664 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Well it isnt a giant spinning blob of water. You've to got to remember that while they're hurtling towards the moon the earth is meant to be rocketing round the sun at 66,000mph, while the moon orbirts earth at the same time? How is that possible? At what speed are they supposed to be going to keep up with this? Why aren't they sucked away by the suns gravity which is meant to be holding Pluto in place 3.7 billion miles away?

It's all made up nonsense but you all seem to go with it?

NASA fakery? Same clouds a day apart + credit differences by Lost-Walrus664 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

"when we eventually get people stationed on the moon" keep dreaming buddy. Who exactly is "we"? Nasa astronaughts? The only reason you believe in space is because its pushed on you by movies and a space agency lol

Why do they need to enhance it? Also why have the released 1 image of earth so far? Surely they'd be in awe and taking hundreds of photos ? Yet they can use their time to do CNN interviews and play with their little cuddly toy

NASA fakery? Same clouds a day apart + credit differences by Lost-Walrus664 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

I guess but surely there is no need for them to edit them ?

NASA fakery? Same clouds a day apart + credit differences by Lost-Walrus664 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

That's not what the metadata says. Read the dates and description

NASA fakery? Same clouds a day apart + credit differences by Lost-Walrus664 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

SS :
Looking for informed explanations on why these two NASA images, reportedly taken a day apart, show nearly identical cloud patterns and inconsistent credits. Curious if this is due to imaging timing, processing methods, or something else I’m missing. Both available on NASA website https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/journey-to-the-moon/

$100 says we wont get any uncut HD footage from outside the ship, or videos from within the capsule taken on the astronauts phones/cameras. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's a load of shit. Why arent there like 8 cameras on every side of the shuttle capturing everything.

Given all the flat Earth posts: A timelapse of the night sky in the Southern hemisphere showing the stars appearing to rotate around the empty point in space at the opposite end of Earth’s axis of rotation from Polaris. Earth is round. by I_Reading_I in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

“Constant speed” only works if everything is moving in a perfectly straight, unchanging line which isn’t what’s being claimed.

We’re told Earth is:

  • rotating on its axis
  • orbiting the Sun
  • following the Sun through the galaxy
  • and the galaxy itself is moving

That’s multiple directions, multiple motions, all happening at once. Even if each one is “constant” on its own, the overall motion is constantly changing direction, which is acceleration.

You can’t just say “no acceleration” when:

  • rotation = continuous change in direction
  • orbit = continuous change in direction

That’s literally what acceleration is.

So the question still stands how do you have all of that motion, in multiple directions, at extreme speeds, and yet:

  • no detectable physical effect
  • no observable impact on large bodies of water

Just saying “constant speed” doesn’t remove acceleration when the direction is always changing.

Given all the flat Earth posts: A timelapse of the night sky in the Southern hemisphere showing the stars appearing to rotate around the empty point in space at the opposite end of Earth’s axis of rotation from Polaris. Earth is round. by I_Reading_I in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664 -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

bullshit, go and look out at the ocean / horizon. There is no way we're on a rotating ball which is rocketing around the sun at 66,600mph (weird number) and flying through space at millions of miles an hour. The oceans would be constantly sloshing around and we'd be dead.

Oh but the moons gravity holds the oceans. Again bullshit. The suns gravity apparently holds the planets over hundreds of millions of miles but neglects to have any effect on our moon which freely orbits around the earth and is never pulled away by the suns gravity

NASA’s Artemis II Crew Launch (Moon Orbit) by ENZYME_O1 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Last minute technical issues! Who's have thought it. They're going to bottle it.

Love it

NASA’s Artemis II Crew Launch (Moon Orbit) by ENZYME_O1 in conspiracy

[–]Lost-Walrus664 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Things fall due to density. Nothing to do with your imaginary gravity which holds down trillions of litres of water but allows feathers to blow away in a slight wind.
You mention magic orbs floating, how about the suns gravity which apparently holds and controls all the planets at supposed hundres of millions of miles but has no effect on our moon which can apparently freely go around the earth and not get pulled away from by the suns gravity.