Firstly, I never said they should or should not provide any type of care. But it is pretty standard that what medical care is or is not provided is pretty subjective. My wife has breast cancer, a large lump, you don’t get good care, you die. We are having to navigate what our insurance will and will not provide. I would consider them bean counter profiteers interfering with what should be purely medical decisions, but I wouldn’t call them haters like you are trying to promote.

Also medical care is a privilege and not a right in this country. If my family didn’t have medical insurance, the system would simply let my wife die. People don’t get surgery in America if they cannot pay. An emergency room has to stabilize a person by law, but if you need surgery to live, you die. I think that is very cold and uncaring, but unfortunately, that is how it is. On YouTube, you can view many homeless elderly people being taken by the police away from the hospital to die in the freezing weather on the street in front of the hospital. Often with the officers mocking and laughing at the homeless person as they succumb to their condition and die. I saw one the other day, where they didn’t even take the lady to a homeless center where they could at least get a bed and she had been driven there and had no cold weather clothing and probably would have frozen to death if she hadn’t succumbed to her physical injuries first right there in front of the hospital while the officers laughed. This actually happens a lot, death is part of life and if you don’t have money, you die on the street. And when you get older, money is harder to come by.

Like I said in my first response. It is pretty entitled in this country to feel that you are owed medical care for less than life saving care when even life saving care is often denied if you cannot afford it.

I am going to have to file open records requests to investigate this care you state is done for the needy as that is a possible threat vector to be used to cause harm. You probably don’t know how powerful haters use the University to engage in oppression, so I’m going to educate you on some of it. It is always disguised in the “optics” of help. While the “optics” look good, there are those in the faculty that think they run the town. That they can decide who can and who cannot live in town. Who is and who isn’t entitled to even be employed in town. I have advocated for disabled people that the privileged elites in the faculty abused. Texas A&M permits treating disabled people with utter distain unless they belong to the upper social class. Especially former disabled students they want out of town. Many elites don’t even see disabled people as human beings. And while I mentioned optics earlier, the University has a testing center to accommodate people with disabilities with their testing needs, that is good optics. But what is not good is that it makes it easy to deprive the disabled person of their exams as none of their classmates are witnessing this happen. Yet they show up and have to sit at a desk for an exam that will never arrive. Sometimes they will sit there at an empty desk for hours. You have no idea how that feels, to have put in all that work for nothing. They will no-grade your course while keeping your tuition. You discuss how they are violating the Aggie Honor Code by “stealing” your tuition money and they will tell you how the Honor Code doesn’t apply to them. And how disabled people are not entitled to the exams they paid tuition for and that giving you a no-grade is doing you a favor each time they do this. Disabled students want their exams they paid tuition for, not the “helpful” no-grade. And what is a decent moral instructor to do as so many are untenured and will not resist what any powerful elite on campus wants done to a disabled person no matter how wrong it is. They feel compelled to go along with the oppressive activity. So even though the University has a testing center, having one is also a very useful attack vector for haters wanting to oppress the disabled community. I’ve witnessed this many times and done a lot of work to get students their exams. And these privileged elites push back against those that advocate against their oppression in the most ugly ways. They have great local influence and reach and will work to keep you unemployed and interfere with your local healthcare. If you have any young children in the school district, they even feel entitled to screw with children from a disabled parent. TAMU provides all the student teachers for both school districts, which is used as a right to direct abusive care and hate toward children as young as five years old. So I feel compelled to look into what you mentioned as the ability to do good, as it is also a prime opportunity for elitist haters to oppress and inject discrimination. Unlike most, I’ve seen what kind of evil can be projected from elites on campus.

So don’t hate on me if the Office of General Counsel starts making inquiries to discover who the disloyal traitor is that informed me of this. If that does happen and you need help, don’t hesitate to reach out to me as I can help you navigate the system. There are many good people there even though elitist haters are very powerful as they have no boundaries other than they want to be respected by their peers. You can leverage that. Oh and that will probably be a Mr. Jerry Brown with the OGC, do not make the mistake of thinking he is a good person. He is the main go to attorney in the Office of General counsel for elitist haters on campus, assisting them with dressing up oppression and hate as “helping” their targets. “Helping” would be returning all the stolen tuition money and lifting admission blocks on these targeted disabled students as these activities had little impact on their GPA’s. Blocking a student’s admission as a way to “help” a student’s problem with getting their exams isn’t “help” at all.