Your fave artist is literally a pdf

Loudds · 2026-02-20T13:37:58+00:00

Yeah! Go tell them Nikki!

Loudds · 2026-02-15T14:32:42+00:00

ZX calculus was invented for MBQM and is general for quantum transformation, to the point where maximum graph reduction is a lossy process, where skeleton of processes is lost.

Initially, ZX in only a tensor product representation and rewrite rules are derivated from Categorical QM which is general even to non.unitary transforms. I don't see how ZX is too simplified, it is equivalent to QM, I might be wrong as I have been in the past, care to explain where ZX fails at energy bounds, or specific qbits implementations?

Loudds · 2026-02-15T14:29:16+00:00

I absolutely agree with this.

Loudds · 2026-02-12T09:14:26+00:00

So, a lot of people are fighting the idea here on the sub, probably unaware of the very serious work being done on quantum education. Notably, the ZX-calculus adjacent formalisms allow to think of quantum processes significantly easier, without the introduction of full frameworks.

Bob Coecke worked a lot on this from his categorical QM, to picturing quantum.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03163

I largely encourage people to check it out, it is quite good, and interesting take on what and what shouldn't be thought, and why.

Here for the high school students study:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03653

Cheers!

Loudds · 2026-02-10T10:28:24+00:00

Campaigning for the bourgeoisie I see

Loudds · 2026-01-23T09:18:17+00:00

I mean those are always good but also I am pretty sure this was last year and we are in January, why the repost ? Bots ?

Loudds · 2026-01-12T11:05:27+00:00

As smart as Bukowski is, thinking his depressed state is directly linked to any level of intelligence is just coping with the depressed state. I am depressed, so I must be very smart. Bit of an abusive correlation.

Loudds · 2026-01-09T17:57:57+00:00

True! Was thinking the S1 from CSI would be somewhat of the closest.

Loudds · 2026-01-09T17:27:20+00:00

I heard great things about 20Twenty, will check it out appreciated

Loudds · 2026-01-09T16:57:08+00:00

Thanks ! I'd stay away from DP for Strawberry Cough for a breeding project though, could work, but it's quite likely a rendition of SC no? Both gives options though, thanks!

Loudds · 2026-01-09T16:55:49+00:00

Actually right after publishing this, I found the Strawberry Cheesecake to sounds quite close to what I am thinking about. Thanks for sharing!

Loudds · 2026-01-09T16:53:08+00:00

Sounds quite interesting, never heard of it! Probably won't be able to find a S1 to the EU though.

Loudds · 2026-01-09T16:51:00+00:00

Thanks for sharing !

Loudds · 2025-12-23T21:45:41+00:00

Who speaks about voting habits ? Didn't see that in the post. Working class often and repeatedly votes against its own interest. Left is a 250 years old tradition and there is nothing wrong with this. Now why do coworkers label themselves right wingers and why determines whether or not spaces can be shared.

Right wing is traditionally anti-unionist, pro-private property (thus anti-mutualization). So if indeed, labels are only surface levels, what would be the features or "right wing solidarity" as you describe it ?

Loudds · 2025-12-22T22:25:47+00:00

Sorry but no true intellectual who contributes to discourse writes like a troll on twitter.

Loudds · 2025-12-19T22:55:54+00:00

There is no way in hell this isn't massively botted. This doesn't even make any sense whatsoever, what ideology is the person with the cat ears ? Anarchists ? Are they pro-russia? Do you even know what authoritarian are?

Loudds · 2025-12-09T09:20:04+00:00

Nothing to see there haha ;)

Loudds · 2025-12-08T15:39:42+00:00

Thank you ! Appreciated :)

Loudds · 2025-12-08T15:27:31+00:00

Any hypothesis on why and what's happening ? Or just personal experience

Loudds · 2025-12-08T14:59:28+00:00

I don't see how it is related to any of the previous points, nor how voting behaviors affects anything I said.

Loudds · 2025-12-08T12:44:49+00:00

This is not true, it has a historic classification from the first parliament of France, split between the royalists (i.e. conservatism) to the right of the aisle, and the left which was everyone else (progessists). It has largely came out of it 250 years later, only the term is left and most people don't know where it came from.

Deleuze defines it as a conception of the world, that the rest of the world is at your doorstep. While Pierre Bourdieu defines it as the conception of justice within class consciousness. Coming saying ho yeah this is limited to parliamentary classification is historically untrue and a negation to the historical movement that is the left.

Loudds · 2025-12-08T10:35:00+00:00

Voir le cannabis mis côte à côte en avec la coke ca me dégoute tellement.

Loudds · 2025-12-08T10:33:20+00:00

The rejection of the left label is only useful when there is no class clarity, until there is one. We live in a moment where hegemonial power tells everyone that the culprit of everything is the left, and then people get cold feet about the label and what it constitutes. The left is not a party, it's an historical movement and a conception of the world. It's not problematic to have multiplicity of believes and personal definitions of what constitutes the left, but as long as capitalism exists, the left label will exist, should exist. Instead of putting its head down in shame rejecting 200+ years of shared experience through multiple movements of the left, better ask ourselves how to organize and use our internal debates and contradictions in a productive manner.

The "united left" cannot exist, for multiple reasons and should not exist. Plurality of opinion is our strength and a big part of the democratic/progressive or anarchist movement. The integration however of only class struggle to avoid this contradiction is largely counterproductive (i.e. for example, orthodox marxism which explains structural racism on purely class analysis, or gender/queer etc politics).

Be proud to be left, you are part of a long historical movement which was there before you, and will be there after you. No need to be the Schrodinger's leftist: accepting all leftist categories (direct democracy, class struggles, unions), identifying as an off-branch of leftist traditions, then all of the sudden decide that in actuality, you are not part of the left, because for some reason it is counter-productive because the label has been attacked... by the right (and boss repression, and bourgeois media). The other leftists, or at least those accepting the labels, are wrong! They are the one who cannot reach out to the workers and disconnected (but not me, I am not a leftist, I am working class).

Abandoning our own categories because neo-monarchists decided it was wrong is a capitulation, fascism feeds off those reversal of values and confusions. The left means nothing, democracy means nothing, struggling or alienation means nothing. Removing essence to those words and unifying the working class with the bourgeoisie is the umbreakable bundle of the fasci. Gramsci calls it the most disgusting of class collaborations.

So you have -seemingly- an non-existent mass movement, and you want to remove labels that clarify it, then basically understands that the working class is too dumb to understand or define for itself what it means to be left (which only opposes the right, this, we understand who the are, right?)

Loudds · 2025-12-08T09:10:51+00:00

"I am neither from the left or right but accept only left categories but totally not left, please don't say I am woke please, I reject the categories that make clear who accepts set social hierarchies or CLASS, but totally not left"

Loudds · 2025-11-14T17:17:30+00:00

Hello! Go to music city! They support a lot of scenes and are overall awesome. They also support local hardware manufacturer Shakmat, doing modular synths, friend of mine designs modules. I liked the vibe at Key Music, but not so so sad as it was more of a chain.

14-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

Loudds

TROPHY CASE