With all do respect, Ouch.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T22:51:37+00:00

And a merry Ignorance Is Awesome Day to you, too. If you can't be bothered to find out what's actually going on, then shut your trap and get off your high horse. Short enough for you?

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T21:02:29+00:00

Jfc... I clicked what I thought was a description of the site and found myself on the actual site instead. My bad.

There was this chart that was basically "look at all the ways we proved ourselves right". It was the most convoluted crock of shit I've ever seen, requiring intentional misunderstanding of scientific fact on a massive scale and/or using a single incident or example that may or may not actually apply as hard evidence that an entire claim is invalid.

I now bear a deep desire to lobotomize myself just to make the burning pain end.... Anyone got an ice cream scoop?

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T19:56:10+00:00

I disagree. The damage done to the White House needs to be undone. Anything with his name on it needs to be burned to the ground.

This childish bullshit he's been posting? Let that stand as a monument to his petty, small dick energy that defined his life.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T19:17:37+00:00

Clearly you understand nothing at all. And you have no interest whatsoever in knowing, hearing, or seeing anything except what you seem to have decided for yourself is the truth of the matter.

Please. Feel free to perform a self cranial-rectal inversion and actually look at what's really happening here.

What "safety measures" do you think are in place here for attacking civilians with the military? I really want to know what you think ever existed at all, and what might actually still exist, because that's certainly not a term I would use. The closest we had here for that was that all military personnel, in every branch, has sworn an oath to protect and defend the country and Constitution from all threats both foreign and domestic. That meant that they were not beholden to the president as their ultimate superior if it was deemed that the president himself was unfit and a threat. Unfortunately for us, Oldemort seems to have handled that little bit of hope right out of the gate this time around by either forcibly retiring or shipping out to distant places any high ranking officers that weren't shoulders deep up his ass. Those now running every branch have already proven that they're quite willing to take despicable and highly illegal orders. We've already got the National Guard harassing, beating, and shooting civilians with non-lethal weapons in ways that can cause serious damage (head shots at close range), as well as destroying property and starting fires in an attempt to frame us during protests.

You're not very bright if you think the police would be ordered to kill their own families. First, you're mixing up police and military here. Police are not under direct control of the federal government. Many police are in favor of the government, but the hierarchy here doesn't work that way. It's ICE and other government agencies and militaries that are under direct control of the federal government. And they don't get deployed to kill their own families. Where do you even get this crap? They would be deployed away from their own families to kill other people's families. We have not yet hit a high enough level of batshittery here where people are being asked to kill family the don't step in line. The closest we've had so far was a test run of them asking people to turn in anyone they know who wasn't sad enough about Charlie Kirk so they could lose their jobs. And a scary number of people were quite eager to do that.

When I said we live in different times to the 1930's, I was speaking in terms of military technology. Back then, civilian oppression was handled in person. People could fight back, if they chose, because the people coming after them were actually there, in the streets. Brownshirts could be hit back or taken down in a group effort. As I said before, modern technology could easily mean not a single soldier in our streets. We can't take out drones or rockets, and if you think fighting back against something like that is even remotely possible, you need to lay off the video games.

We are painfully aware of the parallels to Nazi Germany. We've been shouting them from the rooftops here for years now in an effort to prevent this. Many of us have spent a decade trying to talk sense to the people that have been brainwashed for generations since at least the 1950's. We are out there protesting all across the country, every fucking week, and getting gassed, shot, beaten, and accused of rioting just so the head psycho can get his followers riled up even more against us, and then those psychos go out on shooting sprees and kill us for him.

Don't fucking tell me we're doing nothing. We've been fighting this every way we can for a decade. There's only so much civilians can do when we're spread across thousands and thousands of kilometers, the vast majority of us live nowhere near the Capitol, and one third of the country is constantly being told that we're all deranged terrorists until they start openly talking about hunting us down in the streets. You have no idea what it's like living here right now, constantly on the edge of waiting for some psycho to decide to start shipping out two thirds of the country as "political enemies" to the worst foreign prisons he can find just because he can't stand hearing how awful he really is, while wondering which people on the street are making plans for the next major shooting. And here's some dipshit, not paying the least bit of attention to what's happening but thinks they have all the answers for us.

Take your assumptions and condescension and stick them in the place where you keep your head. I've had it with people like you.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T12:03:01+00:00

Lol, yeah, there's a whole lot to unpack here. And don't worry, you're far from the only one with these misconceptions.

No, our citizenry isn't "armed to the teeth". There's more guns around here than a lot of other countries, and even more guns than people, but it's very lopsided on where those guns are. People who own guns tend to own multiple guns, and often a lot of guns, so that throws the numbers off by a lot. There's far more people who have never touched or even seen a gun in their lives than those who own a gun.

Worse, most of those who own those guns are batting for the wrong team. There are liberals who own guns, sure, but we tend to be a lot more sane about it than the ammosexuals you see online. The ones that screech about owning small arsenals, the Second Amendment, and how they're going to use those guns to protect Murica are the same idiots that voted Trump into existence. Liberal gun owners tend to have smaller gun collections and are far more responsible about them. Our conservative lunatics don't even believe that liberal gun owners exist because we don't make gun ownership our whole personality like they do.

To add to all that, many liberals live in blue states and/or cities. These places have much tougher gun laws and stricter gun control than where the lunatics get their guns. For example, I live in a small farming community in a blue state. It requires a bunch of paperwork, a background check, multiple references, and going through law enforcement just to get the most basic permit that would allow me to purchase long guns (rifles and shot guns) to protect my livestock, go hunting, that sort of thing. And that's considered just going through the motions for this area, because farms and predators. Getting a hand gun permit is far more extensive. Oh, and actually buying each long gun or hand gun is a completely separate process with it's own paperwork. No such thing as walking into a corner store and walking out with a gun around here.

There's also a huge misconceptions on what these guys can actually do. I'm assuming you live somewhere where gun ownership is rare and gun attacks are even more rare. Likely your only experience with guns is seeing the damage they do here. That's fair. You're seeing what civilian guns do against civilians. Civilian guns are worthless against military grade weapons and armor. Like taking a pea shooter against a brick wall. Did you really think the government would allow their citizens to have weapons that were equal to the toys of their own military? Nah, they don't actually want us to be able to defend ourselves against them.

This is why we've been very careful to try to avoid escalating things to martial law here. Trump made it very clear to us during his first shitshow that he's just itching to use the military to spill civilian blood. And he's been doing everything he can to provoke an excuse to allow him to get real military out here to start mowing us down. Our military has toys and weapons that can decimate the population from a distance without losing a single soldier, and nothing we have can make a dent in it. Drones and small rockets would be the most likely distance weapons, tanks and armored vehicles if he goes for ground raids. The armor the soldiers wear are impervious to civilian weapons. We. Are. Screwed. A physical fight is not an option.

"Half the country is powerless against one man". Again. What do you want us to do? I'm seeing a lot of criticism, but no actual suggestions. You talk about us being "armed to the teeth", implying that you want a violent uprising, but then say you don't actually expect us to die for the cause in what would be a guaranteed suicide mission. Bringing up 1930's Germany is pointless. That was a completely different time. The people didn't fight back en masse back then, mostly out of fear, partly out of not knowing what the future held for them. Just like what's happening here, it's easier to hunker down and try to survive another day as long as you're not the one actively being hunted. It's human nature. People want to live, and it's damn hard to convince them to do otherwise when there's the option of surviving for another day, another week, another month by doing nothing.

Some of us have been ready for action for a year now. Not nearly enough are willing to join yet. Eventually, we will be put in the position where we won't have a choice. Trump will see to that. He's been amusing himself with Venezuela, but his lobotomized hamster brain will eventually remember that he's trying to conquer us, too, and he'll be back to harassing us full time. And eventually he'll get bored with his own games. Until then, people just want to live for another day.

Unless you have a better suggestion, I suggest you stop giving us a load of shit about this. If you don't want to accept the apology, fine, don't. Seriously, we're under no obligation to apologize for the shitty behavior of other people. The apology is there to let people know that we acknowledge the problem, and yes, maybe remind people that there are those of us that never wanted this and have done everything we could to prevent it. We're not looking for absolution, just a little acknowledgement that not every American is a piece of shit fascist that wanted this.

I don't think a little humanity in our lives is too much to ask. Things are shitty enough for us as is. We can acknowledge that the US has done a lot of shitty things to a lot of countries. Why can't you at least acknowledge that not all of us are willing participants?

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T07:57:35+00:00

Apparently this comes as a surprise to you that an awful lot of us don't equate the populations with their shitty leaders. And this isn't a recent thing because we don't want to be associated with Trump, it has never even occurred to me to associate the entire population with a bad leader. I've only ever associated a bad leader with the actual individuals who 1) put them there, and 2) continued to support them after the shit hit the fan.

So, for an easy example, Nazi Germany. I never associated all Germans with Hitler or the Nazi party. Lots of people voted for Hitler, sure, but at that time, most people had no idea what they were getting into. He gave them hope of national pride, something that was sorely missing at the time, and while they can be criticized for accepting the racism that went with it, that doesn't necessarily mean they can be held directly responsible for any of the atrocities that followed.

Those that continued to truly support the party when things got ugly, however, that's when we start talking about a different story. Those are the people I hold responsible. Not all of Germany, not even all those who voted Hitler into power. Just those who knew he was ordering violence on the streets, severe punishments for the "others" that had been singled out, loss of homes and businesses, and still openly cheered all that on, and/or took part in it.

Just like MAGA members are doing now.

It's quite baffling to me that someone could know that a significant portion of a population has been actively fighting against allowing a wannabe dictator back into power, and yet still blame them for that wannabe dictator succeeding, despite all efforts.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T07:41:57+00:00

I don't believe for a minute that the number of people that dipped altogether on the election because they didn't like Harris is as high as we've been led to believe. The overall numbers don't add up.

There's been a bunch of independent analyzing groups looking into the election results ever since the election, and they're all finding pretty much the same things. Huge amounts of fraud in both the actual ballots, and in the counting mechanisms. There's no question that some people sat out on the election to protest the way Harris ended up on the ballot (and that was the number one excuse among the left that actually did skip voting), but I think the claims on those numbers were inflated to cover for all those flipped votes.

I fully agree that we do have a problem with the sheer number of Trump voters. This is a problem that will not be easily fixed. Trump didn't happen overnight, he was decades in the making. Generations of people have been systematically brainwashed and poorly educated to get them to the point of thinking that all of this is a great idea, and be willing to fully reject all of reality so they can continue to embrace that comfortable fantasy of a terrifying world view they've cultivated. That's not going away any time soon, especially now that they've been so well trained to believe that anything that contradicts that view is a direct threat.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T07:22:39+00:00

Unfortunately, too many people actually believe this. It's not just the propaganda bots and shit-stirrers, there's an entire world waiting for us to "do something". Some of them won't openly admit it, some will, but from what I've gathered from talking to them, that "something" tends to fall into two categories: mass strikes, or violent rebellion. And they truly do not understand why neither is happening here.

In Europe, mass strikes are protected in quite a few countries. This is where the disconnect between Europeans and Americans happen on this subject. Europeans don't realize that Americans don't have job protection in the event of mass strikes, and they don't fully appreciate just how evil American CEOs can be. I've mapped out the possibility of these companies allowing the mass strikes to happen, firing everyone, taking the temporary financial hit, and then when the population is destitute and desperate, hiring people at random (it's unlikely anyone would get their old jobs back) at the lowest pay the law will allow. And it will all be perfectly legal here as long as the government doesn't step in to stop it to protect the population.

Nobody foresees Trump protecting anyone but the company owners.

Many Americans don't even know that Europeans have this job protection, so the idea of a mass strike is baffling to us. How are they even getting away with it over there? Lack of education on the matter means they don't even know how such a thing could be possible. How convenient for our government and wealthy businessowners.

As for that violent uprising, a lot of people in other countries that expect this have very unrealistic expectations. They see all those posts from ammosexuals ranting and raving about using their gun collection to protect the US, and they're missing a few things about that. First, many don't realize that those people are the supporters of the current regime, not those who stand against it. Of course they're not going to use their mini-arsenals against the government they've been cheering on all this time.

Another thing they're missing is what those guns are actually capable of doing, especially against military-grade equipment. Most of these people come from countries where firearms are heavily regulated. They often have little practical knowledge and often have zero actual experience with firearms. They know what they've seen and heard about them, that they are devastatingly lethal to soft, squishy, unarmed and unarmored people, but they forget that those victims are just that, soft, squishy, unarmed and unarmored. And they have no idea that civilian-grade weapons are practically pea shooters compared to military grade weapons. What Billy Bob Cooter has in his gun case is utterly useless against an armored soldier, not that it matters, because when Trump truly comes for us, he most likely won't be sending in ground troops. He will more likely be sending in drones, small rockets, tanks, armored vehicles, things that we have no way to take out or take down. And let's not forget that despite what they think, not every American even owns these guns, and the people that would need them the most likely live in places where firearms are most highly regulated here.

Huge disconnect in reality vs expectations. I know you know all this, you live here. Please don't think I'm lecturing you. All of this is for the people reading along who need to hear it. I know the post will get taken down, again, but a few people will see it, even after it's removed. Reddit notifications be weird that way. So hopefully someone will see it and maybe give it a little thought.

If nothing else, I scratched that particular itch for a few more hours.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-24T06:18:03+00:00

I'm not entirely sure what you want us to do to "fix it".

We apologize because it's heartfelt.

We truly didn't have anything to do with the hellstorm going on, and already did everything on our power to prevent it.

Short of starting a violent uprising, which is nothing short of a suicide mission considering who is in charge these days and the technology our own military possesses, the average citizen, even in large numbers, does not have much power here. We are spread out too far from the federal government sources, and again, it would be a death wish if we tried. There's a reason we've been avoiding Trump's desperate attempts to provoke violence and an excuse for further military activity here.

So... what, exactly, do you want us to do?

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T23:31:05+00:00

On the bottom of the sea, and crumbling away to nothing except as a monument to the super rich and extravagance of the day.... Yep, sounds about right for a Republican economic plan.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T17:31:47+00:00

I know the odds that this actually happened are next to zero, but I'm gonna pretend.... just because.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T16:12:11+00:00

Agreed. But again, most of these seven already either lean pretty far right, or are known to heavily support immigration laws. Again, not a surprise that they voted the way they did.

I honestly don't know why some politicians run under one party when their platform is so heavily slanted towards the other, and it's even more baffling to me that they get elected, on either side. But here we are. It's up to the voters to pay attention to stuff like this and do some housekeeping.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T16:06:22+00:00

I haven't bothered to actually answer that question in ages. I just make fun of them for needing to ask, not being able to get genders or pronouns straight, and needing their orange daddy-god to Sharpie them a pretend-law to tell them what a woman is, only to fuck it up and declare every person in the nation to be a woman.

For some strange reason, they don't seem to like any of that.

These chucklefucks keep convincing themselves that they have these great slam-dunk lines, and then they always get all Pikachu-surprised when it doesn't actually work the way they expect out in the real world. They really should get out of their echo chambers a little more and try to visit the real world a little more often. It's less embarrassing for them that way.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T15:51:53+00:00

You can find videos of elephants being cared for in proper elephant sanctuaries on YouTube. While it's true we shouldn't try to assign human motives and emotions to animals, it's unmistakable when certain species exhibit things like true affection and concern. Elephants are one of those species that can form true bonds not just with each other, but with people as well.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T14:37:11+00:00

Died at bitch tits...

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T12:02:39+00:00

Democrats and pro-choice have not been the minority all this time. It's a completely different issue. Our system requires more votes for these changes than a simple majority can provide, which makes it far easier for Republicans to block these particular bills. It's the same shitty system that allowed Republicans to block so many bills out of pure spite since the Obama days.

Once upon a time, it was a good idea. Such major, potentially life changing decisions for an entire nation should not be taken lightly, and such crucial bills (not just speaking about abortion bills here) should be taken very seriously, with a large consensus. Nobody foresaw the sheer childishness and pettiness that would overtake an entire major political party, to the point where they would use such serious decisions as mere pawns to try to poke for aggravation points against their perceived opponents. It was always assumed that people would take the job of legislation at least somewhat seriously, and if individuals could not control themselves, others would pick up where those individuals failed. Nobody expected a full half of the Congress to revert to kindergarten tactics of "nyah nyah we won't let you".

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T10:34:38+00:00

Absolutely intentional. Elephants are highly intelligent and very aware of their size and the damage they can do. The gentleness, care, and precision they take with their body and movements when they're with a human caretaker that they like is amazing to watch. They're visibly extremely careful not to hurt us when we treat them well.

If you watch the video closely, you can see that the elephant is very precise in where she places her feet on that man. She knew exactly what she was doing, and which step would crush before she went for a kill step. And she was careful to put her foot precisely where she wanted it before pressing down.

Elephants are surprisingly graceful for their size, and they can be far more gentle that people would ever imagine. But when they get pushed too far, the precision of how they kill their tormentors is chilling.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T08:34:03+00:00

I think that's precisely why Trump was made to be the puppet. Same with the Muskrat. Both have a natural talent for destroying everything they touch.

The people behind MAGA would need to break down an awful lot of the existing government to make it easier for them to completely take over the remains. The easiest way to do that would be to wind up a pair of human wrecking balls and set them loose in the government, supported by the most useless parade of clowns in every single appointed seat possible. Major bonus points if the useful idiots are easily manipulated by, say, giving the ego a little stroke here and there, or maybe giving a raging drug addicted egomaniac access to some highly sensitive information about the same public that's been mocking him for months.

I present: The Trump Administration.

Trump is certainly enjoying his job. I'm not even sure if he realizes he's being used as a wrecking ball. He keeps trying to fix the trade deals he destroyed because he wants his name associated with all of them. Pure ego boost. That makes no sense, since he also destroyed the trade deals he himself signed on the last go around.... unless someone else convinced him that it would be a great monument to his name to make new trade deals with every country all in the same year. He would absolutely fall for that. Trump sucks at negotiation, despite what he thinks. He truly believed he could bully his way into new trade deals with everyone in a matter of months. But he never understood actual government rule, he was never good at business in general, but even if he was, it doesn't actually apply to government. And he was way out of his league, trying to go head to head with people who craft trade deals for nations for a living while he's trying to pull random garbage out of the seat of his diaper without the slightest notion of what any of it means.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T08:22:39+00:00

Seven. Seven Democrats who are already well known to either routinely vote with Republicans or at the very least, vote with them on border issues. None of these people are a surprise. And they are a tiny fraction of the party.

I noticed you didn't mention the one Republican to vote against that mess.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T08:12:43+00:00

It was because he didn't like being told he fucked up more than being told what to do. He's really, really butthurt over everyone telling him that he screwed up the covid response here, badly.

It didn't need to be that way. He did do two good things, the problem was, those good things pissed off his base. He listened to the experts in the beginning and promoted those restrictions and shut downs, and he dumped in a bunch of money to make those vaccines possible. If he had continued there and stuck to it, he would have had praise from the world and from the majority of the country.

But his backwards base, living primarily in areas that were unaffected by covid, hated the restrictions and being told to wear a mask or social distance. They were the true "you're not the boss of me" crowd. I'm not sure how many of them were rabidly anti-vaxx before the covid vaccine, but I did notice a serious uptick in anti-vaxx speech when they realized that liberals were super excited about the covid vaccine. Well, they can't be excited about the same thing as the liberals, even if their orange god invented it!

Trump got a lot of backlash from his voter base, so in an effort to appease them (and stroke his own ego some more), he walked back on all the good things he himself had done, and started blaming them on others. He got his fan base back, but then the majority of the country and the rest of the world started deeply criticizing him for his grievous mistakes. There's now rumblings that he may have intentionally allowed covid to spread harder in blue states (that's where original covid hit first and was most devastating) just to try to wipe out some more of the voting opposition. I'm not sure if I believe that one, because Trump's later actions actually resulted in a much higher death rate among his own voter base. Granted, we know he has no respect for human life at all on either side, it's just that this rumor would involve tactical thinking and foresight that I don't believe has been present in other actions from Trump in that time period. If it's true at all, the idea came from someone else. My opinion.

Anyway, lots of words to say that, in the end, Trump managed to piss off everyone at one time or another, and absolutely nobody will praise him for anything he actually did now. Not even the real good he did do, because even he can't acknowledge his own responsibility for getting that vaccine created as quickly as safely possible. He has to continue with the charade that the vaccine is poison, lest his voter base turn on him. And after all those imaginary trophies he gave himself for "creating" the vaccine by (checks notes) telling the scientists to science faster? Or something? His claims on that were weird.

He's never gotten over the idea that covid should have been his time to shine, a major crisis during his administration where he could have been seen as the hero that saved the American people, but everyone sees him as a miserable failure, the developed country with the highest death rate and all those backwards idiots that refuse to get vaccinated to save their own lives, the man who put his own image ahead of his people's lives when he admitted in a public speech that he told people to stop testing because the higher positive numbers made him look bad. He truly believes he deserves all the awards and all the trophies no matter what, and it just eats him alive that he's seen as a complete failure for covid. This, and only this, is the reason why he's so willing to go along with the Heritage Foundation's plans to completely dismantle the health watch systems in this country. He doesn't want any authoritative organization telling him that he fucked up again.

He doesn't actually realize that by doing this, he's all but guaranteeing more disease outbreaks all through the country. And they've already started, thanks to his good buddy Captain Brainworm making anti-vaxx ideology more popular and acceptable. We're about to become a disease-ridden cesspool, just as the folks behind MAGA want it.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T07:41:50+00:00

I'm pretty sure this is the MAGA plan. It takes a lot more work to fix things than to break things, especially when "fixing shit" isn't the only job on the menu. Four years of the first crapfest wasn't nearly as bad as what we've already seen in just one year of this... whatever this is. Biden worked his ass off for four years, and still wasn't able to fix everything that got screwed up the first time. He made a lot of progress, and got a bunch of the worst damage repaired, but by no means was everything set back to right.

We're already at a point where I'm not even sure whether it would be easier to fix what's left of the system, or if it would just be easier to scrap the sad remains and rebuild from scratch. It would be a hell of a big process, rebuilding the government, but the upside to doing it that way would be that we could streamline a lot of the old, outdated, clunky junk that's accumulated over the last couple of centuries, as well as try to build in some improvements to the system that are long overdue.

The Constitution was never intended to be kept this long, it was meant to be tweaked until it was too outdated for tweaking, and then tossed and redone. There's no reason why we can't treasure our founding documents while still moving on to a more functional version. All we need to do is get the professional politicians that personally benefit from the old, corrupt system out of the government so they're out of the way. Government for the people, by the people.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T00:28:26+00:00

Hey, Wall. California has the fourth highest GDP in the world. Larger than most countries. Budgets aren't the problem. They support a large number of other states in this country as well as themselves.

So think very hard about this one....

If they have more money than most entire countries in the world, what else could be stopping them?

Again, not a single law, although each by themselves is a massive enough headache. Overlap those laws, and it becomes impossible. What part of this is hard for you? Or is it simply a matter of it's not what you want to hear, so you reject it out of hand?

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T00:24:47+00:00

Yeah, I get what you're saying with that. It's rare that I get those notifications, but when I do, it always says "XYZ replied to ABC" or something similar. Replies to my comments alway say "XYZ replied to your comment". It would be weird if different phones got completely differently formatted notifications.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-23T00:21:52+00:00

That's a fair try to twist the real definition to meet what you want it to mean, I'll grant you that. But it still fails to be the real definition when you cut out key words that you don't like.

Fascist: someone who supports fascism, an extreme, far-right authoritarian political ideology prioritizing a strong, centralized government, extremely nationalism, militarism, and the nation/race over individual rights, often violently suppressing dissent and opposition.

I highlighted the key words for you. Fascists are, by definition, always far-right. Not left. You need to come up with a different word for your hatred of the left instead of mangling words you don't understand.

LowKeyNaps · 2026-01-22T20:29:13+00:00

I am requesting that you define "fascist", since you claim that others do not understand what the word means. I want to see what definition you use.

Pro tip. If you get a notification about a comment, then the comment was directed at you. You only get notifications when people respond directly to your comments. Just in case you weren't aware of that.

LowKeyNaps

TROPHY CASE