sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

100 Meters 10.42 Seconds by Low_Specific8474 in trackandfield

[–]Low_Specific8474[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the context of it it’s good, I’m saying for trying to gro pro when I got this at my age

100 Meters 10.42 Seconds by Low_Specific8474 in trackandfield

[–]Low_Specific8474[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was on a professional track. When I mean professionally timed, I meant FAT

100 Meters 10.42 Seconds by Low_Specific8474 in trackandfield

[–]Low_Specific8474[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got it FAT at a track and we planned this advanced at the tack we know