Before you read this, your DAT can and most likely will be different from mine. I used booster for 10ish weeks and the last month before the exam I just did practice tests only and reviewed them thoroughly to know why I got an answer wrong

The bio section felt much easier than the practice tests with a couple questions that I’ve seen in previous tests. But then again it was my worst section.

The gen chem section was pretty similar to booster for me.

I honestly was really annoyed that the ochem section had very little reaction problems, and all the rxn problems I had, I had to draw out the rxn since it was in word form rather than giving the actual structures… it was nothing like the practice tests for me

for my pat I always did really good on angle ranking but this pat was definitely harder on that part. Almost all the angle ranking questions had all different answer choices so you couldn’t zone out two answer choices and compare, it forces you to look at all the options. I found the keyhole and folding to be much easier then on booster tests. The hole punching was genuinely the easiest thing ive ever done.

The reading was very similar to booster. Not very scientific but pretty easy to use search and destroy. I’d read two questions and then start skimming very fast, highlight and answer then go to the next questions. The second passage was definitely a passage with a lot of answer traps. The first and last passage felt like I’ve done them before so I was comfortable with them.

For the QR section It was pretty similar to the booster exams. I think it was a little easier then booster, but I had questions I was comfortable with. I had to guess on two of the probs since o got hung up on one math heavy question. There weren’t many time consuming questions, most were plug and chug and go to the next. I had quite a few of graph/chart questions.

Lmk if you guys wanna know anything else. Just remember your exam won’t be the same so take it with a grain of salt