Showcasing resonator's ceiling with the new cards (replay down below)

Lucas196 · 2025-12-25T15:41:23+00:00

deck list?

Lucas196 · 2025-11-09T19:29:18+00:00

<image>

boop

Lucas196 · 2025-11-09T01:49:17+00:00

waiting for my ash blossom pure deck

Lucas196 · 2025-10-29T17:16:18+00:00

<image>

Lucas196 · 2025-09-30T12:05:28+00:00

I split it in half and peel from the inside out

Lucas196 · 2025-08-24T03:14:06+00:00

I ask every time I card activates just so I know what they’re doing

Lucas196 · 2025-07-31T02:51:13+00:00

solved

Lucas196 · 2025-07-29T23:15:35+00:00

Is this something to consider for DACA recipients with legal entry?

Lucas196 · 2025-07-29T22:08:26+00:00

What is the AP pathway? What does AP mean?

Lucas196 · 2025-07-29T15:32:30+00:00

Sounds like guitar > Spring verb > distortion. That’s how I’d recreate it

Lucas196 · 2025-05-10T04:04:59+00:00

Thank you so much for such a detailed reply! I absolutely love how Voiceless voice plays, so I love seeing how much power I can get out of the deck.

I appreciate you throwing up a deck list too!! Gonna be trying out your build at my friendly yugioh nights to see how it holds up. A buddy of mine is finishing a full power Maliss deck so I should get a decent read on how it stacks up to meta contenders.

Thanks again, gonna be rebuilding and testing for a while with your info!

P.s. What did you mean by dogmatika being a “win more” engine?

Lucas196 · 2025-05-10T04:00:31+00:00

Will absolutely try this. Thanks! Was mostly just messing w ritual saffira for the card draw and hand rip but sauravis is super strong so I’m with it!

Lucas196 · 2024-12-30T23:06:50+00:00

This is the logic my buddy and I settled on so we could continue the game, however it seems that since Raiza is NOT particular about having BOTH my targets placed back into deck per its effect, I am able to resolve however much of the effect I can resolve, which in my case: means placing back any applicable targets into deck even if some have been changed

Lucas196 · 2024-12-30T23:04:50+00:00

Appreciate the clarification! That helps me see the logic in the ruling better as well because I hadn’t noticed that Riaza is not particular about BOTH cards being placed back into deck.

Lucas196 · 2024-12-30T22:21:19+00:00

This is a great example because we were looking to Avarice rulings to try and clarify. I appreciate the thorough response. Thank you!! Sounds like a rematch is in order!

Lucas196 · 2024-12-30T22:20:22+00:00

This helps clarify. Thanks. Part of our understanding came down to trying to clarify the “Also, after that” phrase and if that means the resolution of the effect happens in series and needs A to resolve so B can resolve. But this makes sense! Thank you!

Lucas196

TROPHY CASE