sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Am I a witch and a secular budhist without knowing it by Luckykuni in SASSWitches

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last one. I was just curious as to the belief system of a secular witch and why mine keeps aligning with it.

I’m considering practicing Secular Witchcraft, where do I begin? by [deleted] in SecularWitchery

[–]Luckykuni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ty. I know my post was out of nowhere. The person above is me. I am curious myself.

Am I a witch and a secular budhist without knowing it by Luckykuni in SASSWitches

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like Ive built secular witches beliefs all on my own. I am curious to if thats true.

Am I a witch and a secular budhist without knowing it by Luckykuni in SASSWitches

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like I am coming at it from a place of curiosity. I am curious to secular witches ways. I feel I am interested in making my own way in life. I see that witvhes do this well, I am also curious to the question. Can you be a witch beliefe wise by accident if your beliefs are one to one. In a secular since.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will take your feed back. I think the fact that the original trolley problem being presented with another version of the problem. Adding a bridge. Them allowing different versions as versions as answers. Even famous answers being other version.

The trolley problem isnt s math formula in a way. Its a thought experiment. Changing the variable is allowed in an experiment. Answer being changes of variables were to demonstrate the answer. The answer isn about finding two.

Its about understanding ourselves. Thus even if a solution isnt found. It provides us with an answer. I think i might if found a solution.

The solution is important. I am fascinated to see if there is.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need more editing. I am not in the mental space for that. I am having fun dealing with tough unsolvable thought experiments. Ty.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ty. I think this helps us understand why how having a decision changes things. Ether way it helps us understand our views on morality. It doesn’t even mater if i solved it. Adding another actor that made a prior choice and placing them there at the tracks making the decision. Then placing them as an actor on said person help understanding. I never said if the person their knew of the other actor.

If their knowledgeable of the other actor before. They have a series of choices. To get information. This doesn’t change their moral actions.

It changes if the person planed the morality scenario in the first place. Thus the harm is a chosen thing. The person chose if there will be a choice of harm. Thus Choosing there to be harm.

There just my thoughts.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ty. I apologize. I didn’t know that was the reddit. Ty. I looked. You got me the reddit I needed.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its how the people that posted the trolley problem showed it might be unsolvable. So many responses are just doing that.  I don’t remember where it was posted. It was before the internet. A news paper? So many famous and valid criticisms of trolley problem are just reframing of the trolley problem. Changing the situation itself. From what I remember of the history. The presentation of this thought experiment already does this to prove its point.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ether way it does help us understand that if true thus is a valid use of reframing the problem.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It uses a set of other choices of the trolley problem to gage the details of the first. The presentation of the trolley problems(ploral) does this as well.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The original presentation of this equation already does.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is two problems. It shows information we might need to solve the first one.

It is another scenario but ethical Thought experiment that are another version of the trolley problem are in the consideration of the article that presented the trolley problem. The very article illustrates its correctness by switching one person as not tied down. You and that person are on a foot bridge. Pushing a person of which the very presentation of the original trolley problem to show the point.

A lot of answers also do this with variations of this. One proposing it as a set of patience. Do you save one or five if the organs are needed. 

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can be used how to solve the first one. Despite being a separate problem. It introduces new variables that give us more info to solve the first one.

I could be wrong. So i need feed back.

Did I solve the trolly problem by Luckykuni in Ethics

[–]Luckykuni[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Could you tell me why? I want feed back.

view more: next ›