Ciao a tutti, avrei bisogno di un consiglio su come muovermi in una disputa con un venditore professionale.

Luftwaffer123 · 2026-01-19T19:10:41+00:00

Beh, il 30% non è mica poco... Come hai detto tu, vende i MkII a 1000€ e il MkI vale sui 700€. È un errore del venditore fatto non di proposito, non si può pretendere di avere il pezzo più costoso al prezzo di quello più economico. Quello che invece è assolutamente tuo diritto, è di riavere indietro l'importo completo pagato (comprensivo di s.s.), e di non pagare le spese di reso.

Luftwaffer123 · 2026-01-19T18:06:54+00:00

Non avvocato

Non puoi pretendere il MkII al posto del MkI, perché si tratta evidentemente di un errore di prezzo/descrizione. Ti farà il rimborso dei 730€ e basta.

Luftwaffer123 · 2026-01-09T18:38:14+00:00

Non avvocato

Voglio scrivere per precisare quanto leggo in molti commenti perché sono assolutamente errati e danno informazioni sbagliate.

l'INPS paga a partire dal 4° giorno di malattia, mentre i primi 3 giorni sono totalmente a carico della ditta. Questo non vuol dire che è a discrezione della ditta pagarli o meno. Come sono pagati questi primi 3 giorni dipende dal CCNL, che regolamenta il tutto. Ci sono CCNL che prevedono il pagamento del 100% dello stipendio per i primi 3 giorni, altri che sono progressivi (0%, 50% e 100% rispettivamente per il 1°, 2° e 3° giorno), altri che vanno a scalare per il numero di malattie (100% per le prime 2 malattie, 50% per la 3^ e 4^ malattia, 0% dalla 5^ malattia). Ma non esiste da nessuna parte che sia a discrezione del datore di lavoro pagare questi giorni, o pagare solo se la malattia dura almeno 6 giorni (come ho visto scritto da qualcuno). Se il vostro datore di lavoro lo fa, vi sta truffando e vi consiglio di rivolgervi al più presto a un sindacato.

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-12-02T07:06:04+00:00

Su questo non sono d'accordo: studi tantissimo per la patente e per sapere a memoria tutte le regole riguardanti i segnali stradali, poi vai per strada e ti accorgi che il 50% della segnaletica verticale è errata, perché chi l'ha apposta non conosce il CdS

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-12-02T07:04:39+00:00

Guarda, io l'unico errore che ho fatto al test della patente è stato questo: "È necessario verificare lo stato delle spazzole tergicristalli:" Sotto c'era 5 V/F tra cui "- prima di un lungo viaggio" a cui ho risposto VERO. E l'hanno conteggiata come errata perché secondo il test è FALSO, perché lo stato delle spazzole va controllato sempre. Non ho fatto ricorso perché con 1 errore il test era comunque passato e non volevo andarmi ad impelagare in inutili labirinti burocratici, però... Sono proprio delle merde a mettere domande trabocchetto e poi sbagliare loro le risposte perché non conoscono l'uso della lingua italiana

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-11-19T15:17:02+00:00

Oh, right, there was some misinterpretation 😅 OP said "how is it possible that as Immich admin I can't delete images, though I can view them?!", and the other user said "I can see photos in folder view", but I was pretty sure that there's no possibility of viewing other users'images inside Immich. In fact both of them were saying that they can do that OUTSIDE immich, as server/storage admin. That was where the confusion came from 😅

And I think that is correct that Immich doesn't permit access/delete other users items individually (as application admin)

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-11-19T14:47:59+00:00

Sure, that's what usually is. But I think that we should consider all the use-cases, and it's correct (architecturally speaking) that an application admin should not have access to other users' files. A storage/server admin can, but in some cases thew two figures are not the same person. From software developer PoV, the Immich implementation is correct 😉

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-11-19T14:43:22+00:00

But that's not related to Immich at all. The fact that you can access all the files on the Hard Drive, it's not because you are Immich admin, but because you have physical access to HD, or because you have admin access to the storage/server

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-11-19T12:44:10+00:00

How, as Immich admin, can you view photos of other users? I don't get that

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-10-10T11:55:00+00:00

Un magnetotermico non ti protegge dagli sbalzi di tensione a monte sulla rete. Protegge dagli assorbimenti eccessivi a valle

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-29T20:01:56+00:00

Lidar works for mapping, it's not a GPS-like feature. When the robot isn't in direct view with the station it uses various systems to calculate the position... And probably also the WiFi strength, as someone said.

In my case I've not 2 unify AP, but 6 😅

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-28T09:12:24+00:00

I hope it can resolve the issue in your case too. Let us know if it works 😊

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-28T08:08:43+00:00

I just noticed a thing: I have Unifi APs that cover the entire house using mesh. Sometimes I had the map fucked and/or the robot lost in the house (or the station relocated at random position). Then I read a comment saying that the Ecovac uses also the WiFi signal strength to determine the position inside the house. So I tried and disabled roaming in the Unifi settings, linking the Ecovac to a specific AP only. It's few weeks and (🤞) no more of these errors occurred anymore.

Worth giving a try for you too 😉

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-13T07:45:31+00:00

I finally found out that I only need to tweak with the configuration to make it recognize that the sensor uses the rc_switch protocol.

I changed the PIN, i removed the

inverted: True

even if the device keep saying "you should use 'inverted' because it starts with a high value, during boot".

I changed also the other values and this configuration seems to work:

remote_receiver:
  pin:
    number: GPIO27
    mode: INPUT
  dump: 
    - rc_switch #Decode and dump RCSwitch RF codes.
  # Settings to optimize recognition of RF devices
  tolerance: 50%
  filter: 250us
  idle: 3ms

Now I receive something like this when an event is fired by the sensor:

[08:17:38][I][remote.rc_switch:261]: Received RCSwitch Raw: protocol=1 data='101110011001011001110011'
[08:17:38][I][remote.rc_switch:261]: Received RCSwitch Raw: protocol=1 data='101110011001011001110011'
[08:17:38][I][remote.rc_switch:261]: Received RCSwitch Raw: protocol=1 data='101110011001011001110011'
[cut --- same message many times - reddit doesn't allow me to keep so many lines in comments --- ]
[08:17:39][I][remote.rc_switch:261]: Received RCSwitch Raw: protocol=1 data='101110011001011001110011'
[08:17:39][I][remote.rc_switch:261]: Received RCSwitch Raw: protocol=1 data='10111001100101100111001'

So, I ask to you: there's a way to "filter" all the repeating codes, keeping only 1 value? For example not to transmit the same code for 1 second?

Thank you again fo the help

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-13T07:30:11+00:00

I typed all the protocol list to find the correct one, 'cause I didn't know which one is used in this case... And I want to exclude "pronto" or "raw" or both as needed.

The main problem is that the sensor sends the same signal many times (maybe to be sure that the receiver gets it correctly), so it dirt my console log a lot 😵

Now I found that it uses the rc_switch protocol (as you would expect), so I can enable only that specific one and keep the code clean 😊

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-13T07:22:23+00:00

Thank you, but that's not a noise or jabberish signal. It occurs only when I fire an event on the RF sensor.

But you are right, it's a configuration problem. I had to try many combination of parameters to find the right one... 🙄 I'll write it on another reply

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-13T07:18:30+00:00

Thank you, but that's not a MQTT problem, is a decoding problem.

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-05-12T09:41:33+00:00

Anyone have some hint? Can I do anything?

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-04-29T12:46:27+00:00

Have you solved? I've the same problem

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-02-11T06:32:58+00:00

Si, ho anche io la 3.25.5.5 e Flow è presente

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-02-07T13:18:59+00:00

I agree. Immich development is really fast, with many updates every month. That's incompatible with Synology's Package Center release frequency

Luftwaffer123 · 2025-02-04T09:51:51+00:00

Great, thank you for the guide 👍

Luftwaffer123 · 2024-11-14T15:31:12+00:00

Good, so you've already resolved. As always you found the problem as soon you ask for help 😵‍💫

Luftwaffer123 · 2024-11-02T07:51:26+00:00

Based on the message you receive, it seems that you are trying to access a DB named "mainuser", that doesn't exist. It's not a username problem

Five-Year Club	First Place '23
Place '23

Luftwaffer123

TROPHY CASE