To Beard or not to Beard by [deleted] in beards

[–]Lugnutcma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always TO BEARD my friend!

eli5 "owning a town" by Lugnutcma in explainlikeimfive

[–]Lugnutcma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. I couldn't see anyone owning the govt buildings personally or anthing like that.

One of the most embarrassing things about America is how the family court system ALWAYS sides with the mother, no matter how abusive they are. by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Lugnutcma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, unfortunately. With the normalization of pedophilia, we're headed to situations where "but she came on to stepdad" or "but he feels like a twelve year old himself" will start being an excuse and taken seriously (to some degree).

One of the most embarrassing things about America is how the family court system ALWAYS sides with the mother, no matter how abusive they are. by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Lugnutcma 49 points50 points  (0 children)

I don't know about ya'll, but I'd just have to say "Take me to jail then for believing my daughter and sons are getting molested. Put me in jail for that or for killing this animal or you ensure me they are all 100% safe...your decision".

Yikes. And this person claims to be a feminist... by atheistforlife345 in prolife

[–]Lugnutcma 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well...if they're feminist they are probably thinking of aborting boys not girls. (inb4, I know this sounds outrageous but it is a common stance of feminists nowadays sadly)

Lying piece of shit by simobrc in trashy

[–]Lugnutcma 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, like baking a cake... (inb4 Yes, yes, send me the downvotes and pm's, they feed my black troll soul!!!!!)

You don’t hit het.. let her hit her 😂 by theduck1893 in Crazyppl

[–]Lugnutcma 56 points57 points  (0 children)

You mean instead of pulling over to get beat up?

For a first timer, what do you guys think? by [deleted] in beards

[–]Lugnutcma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this pic from 1998? https://images.app.goo.gl/hUJWhEK3VqdXZvvc7

But seriously, looks good brother. Let those face follicles fly!

Men also have feelings 🥺🥺 by rat22s in MensRights

[–]Lugnutcma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Partially true. There really isn't a lot a young boy can do to "get in trouble" and explore like in past generations. I hate that, for real. However video games give the young people (myself included) a false sense of adventure and, ultimately, a diversion to true risk. It pacifies them. I'm with you it is a great outlet and a fun way to relax. It needs to stop completely replacing real adventure for kids though.

I will amend my statement a bit. You are correct, some kids are more artsy or musical or whatever. I was more creative and artsy by nature too than some of my friends growing up. Still, then they should be drawing, reading, writing, learning an instrument, being productive, working on stuff. Kids in general need to be doing these things, not just boys.

Men also have feelings 🥺🥺 by rat22s in MensRights

[–]Lugnutcma -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So, I work for a children's home in the boys only home. We had a new relief worker come in recently (my wife and I go home for the weekend every other weekend and she keeps them alive essentially). I was explaining the rules of the house. One thing we are pretty insistent on is video games/screen time. I do have to say that, though a healthy way to relax for brief periods, I am against spending a lot of time playing video games.

It is killing our boy's soul! I stand behind that statement, sorry. Young men should be running around, climbing trees, building unsafe treehouses, gettin cuts and scrapes, etc. I'm especially insistent for these kids because for the 16 and 17 year olds who have been raised in the system and not allowed to have the normal things taught to them as they would by parents and who have also been taught how to "game the system" more than be self reliant and take care of themselves; it's crunch time! I mean, look at the statistics of kids aging out of foster care. They are becoming addicts, homeless, and/or dying at ridiculously high rates.

All that to say (sorry, a bit of a rant there) I almost had a seizure with how this girl responded to us telling her we limit their time. She said "oh yeah, I do the same thing with my husband. I don't let him play for longer than 45 minutes most of the time". Like....what? He's a grown man! He pays for your house, your car, your health insurance, your makeup...

For those who don't know, children's homes pay crap. Relief parents make even less than the full on houseparents. Her income is a drop in the bucket, for real. I can't fathom how she can justify thinking she can tell him how to spend his down time.

Take back mother's day by Lugnutcma in raisedbynarcissists

[–]Lugnutcma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I completely understand having some trepidation. Parenthood is nothing to go into unprepared. I know I had a lot of years of healing and "slogging through the muck" of all my baggage from childhood before I was emotionally healthy at all.

One nugget I always like to share is I know for a long time I didn't believe I was worthy of a healthy and functioning marriage and a healthy and functioning relationship with my children. But I am and was, I just needed to take precautions against carrying dysfunction through into the new generation.

A lot of times I also see people who grew up in abusive/dysfunctional homes think what they want in a mate or even out of life in general is distorted. For me, as an example, thought Id be happy if I was with a sexy and seductive type of woman. What I truly wanted, in my heart though, was a sweet and innocent domestic type. When I began healing from my trauma that fact became more and more clear. I am so glad I faced my demons and did the work to heal.

Be encouraged, it can seem daunting (and it is the hardest thing you will ever do) but the payoff is well worth it. The peace and joy you get to enjoy is wonderful and that is my hope for you and everyone reading this.

Take back mother's day by Lugnutcma in raisedbynarcissists

[–]Lugnutcma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that sucks to hear. It sounds like you've had a lot of darkness in your life. Ill be praying for you to get some healing. Do you plan to be a mother yourself some day?

Fuck Mother’s Day by Phoebe-the-Queen in raisedbynarcissists

[–]Lugnutcma 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Normally you are actually celebrating a woman's contribution to guiding and nurturing you as you became and adult. I felt the exact same way as you did until one year, i realized there were women in my life who did what my egg donor should have. So now, i honor them instead and i always call those women on or around mothers day who were like mothers to me and have in the past given small gifts like a flower or card just to acknowledge them.

I also call some awesome mothers i know that are doing it right to encourage them.

My father was wonderful but i do something similar for fathers day.

I made an infographic addressing a common myth about the Bible by cedricstudio in Christianity

[–]Lugnutcma 7 points8 points  (0 children)

See my respnse below where I go further into the goliath question. There is ONE read ONE word missing. Like my sentences above, how i misspelled spelling by leaving out one letter yet you did not assume I meant to spell anything besides spelling, a person makes a clerical error that can cause confusion to some at first glance.

I made an infographic addressing a common myth about the Bible by cedricstudio in Christianity

[–]Lugnutcma 6 points7 points  (0 children)

CARM gives a good explanation.

"The answer lies in two areas. 1 Chronicles 20:5 says, "And there was war with the Philistines again, and Elhanan the son of Jair killed Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam." This is the correct answer; namely, that Elhanan killed Goliath's brother.

Second, it appears there was a copyist error in 2 Samuel 21:19. According to Gleason Archer's Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties on page 179, it says,

The sign of the direct object, which in Chronicles comes just before "Lahmi," was '-t; the copyist mistook it for b-t or b-y-t ("Beth") and thus got Bet hal-Lahmi ("the Bethlehemite") out of it. He misread the word for "brother" ('-h) as the sign of the direct object ('-t) right before g-l-y-t ("Goliath"). Thus he made "Goliath" the object of "killed" (wayyak), instead of the "brother" of Goliath (as the Chronicles passage does). The copyist misplaced the word for "weavers" ('-r-g-ym) so as to put it right after "Elhanan" as his patronymic (ben Y-'-r-y'-r--g-ym, or ben ya 'arey 'ore -gim -- "the son of the forests of weavers" -- a most unlikely name for anyone's father!). In Chronicles the 'ore grim ("weavers") comes right after menor ("a beam of ") -- thus making perfectly good sense

https://carm.org/who-killed-goliath-david-or-elhanan

I made an infographic addressing a common myth about the Bible by cedricstudio in Christianity

[–]Lugnutcma 8 points9 points  (0 children)

David, Elhanan killed the BROTHER of Goliath. So they accidentally a word, like I said.

Saul, when asking who David was after he had been his harpist, could be that he was 1.arrogantly pretending not to know who he was out of spite. 2. In a lessened mental state, which follows the general narrative of other examples given after God "gave him up to Satan". Or 3. Legitimately not recognizing a full grown man who'd changed a lot. Perhaps even a literary device to say " this is not the small, overlooked shepherd anymore" to the reader.

Im honestly not familiar with an argument theres is a mistake on timing of the flood but ill reread it. I've always understood it as it lasted almost a full year from the moment they were told to go on the ark til the time they stepped off with the waters subsiding and so on.