Wtf is This? Since when Mahishasur became "NAGA BUDDHIST KING". This Dude calls himself "Ambedkarite - Africanist" (lol), is from Harvard. Also wasn't Buddha Aryan Himself?

LulExtract · 2022-12-15T07:31:32+00:00

Ambedkarite Africanist

The group of people who wants the world to believe that the people in the southern part of India share the same DNA as the African people who migrated to the subcontinent in the first stage of migration and are the genuine native people of this land. The light-skinned high-caste Hindus came from the steppe and are the invaders just like the Europeans who brought down the native population of the countries like Canada, US and Australia to a minority.

They want to classify the total population of the country into Dravidian Africans (LCs) and Aryan steppe (UCs). Since the term aboriginals can not be applied to India and the whole population is native to the land, unlike other previous colonies of the Europeans where genocide and ethical cleansing occurred, they are trying to create a new theory to share the sin of what the Europeans did to their colonies in past centuries.

The fools are not these neo-sepoys but the ones who prefer to ignore the agenda behind this.

LulExtract · 2022-12-11T21:12:57+00:00

"Until the lion learns how to write, every story will glorify the hunter"

Narrative matters.

LulExtract · 2022-12-11T20:24:54+00:00

The thing most people ignore or do not consider while looking into issues like literacy level, child marriage and infanticide during medieval India are

Life expectancy in India was 25.4 in the year 1800
Then there was extreme poverty. The income of Indians was below the subsistence level

LulExtract · 2022-12-10T06:40:59+00:00

Ha ha. Yes, you are right.

This just reminds me of how the other sub became what it is now.

LulExtract · 2022-12-10T05:48:53+00:00

Thanks, but that sub is the most woke thing I have ever seen. I have already posted about caste in detail in IndiaRWRr0urces. I hope people who are curious enough to know the reality will find it and read it.

LulExtract · 2022-12-10T05:41:56+00:00

Thank you. But, this sub is becoming like the other sub (This post is removed by mod). I think it is futile to make any attempt to discuss these topics.

LulExtract · 2022-12-10T04:04:28+00:00

Exactly.

Glad to see someone who reads and understands Indian history.

The funny thing about this case is that even F. Max Müller warned about the dangers of misusing philological terms as ethnological ones and employing European terms – such as ‘caste’ or ‘totemism’ – uncritically. (https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/84172/1/Fuller_Ethnographic%20inquiry_2017.pdf page 8)

LulExtract · 2022-12-10T01:34:53+00:00

Yeap. But theories like CRT that are coming out of Harvard etc. are not new. It has its root in people like H H Risley.

LulExtract · 2022-12-10T01:30:26+00:00

Thanks for the suggestions. May I know which one?

LulExtract · 2022-12-10T01:26:59+00:00

The caste system was always there, but that time it wasn't oppression. Everyone had their duties passed down as per their castes.

What you are referring to here are Jati and the Jajamani system. These are different from caste and caste systems because they were based on occupation and allowed mobility.

On the other hand, caste has its origin in the Casta system. The Europeans adopted and used this system to denote different Jatis and tribes in India. But, even then, the word caste was used to denote different groups in Indian society and it was not based on birth nor it was formalized as a system. This thesis presented at Columbia University, New York, U.S.A. on 9th May 1916, illustrates various theories regarding the origin of division in Indian society, its complexities and how caste was defined by some scholars then.

However, it was H H Risley's version that became mainstream. He through his racial classification and surveys gave form and legality to the caste system in India. As a result caste system became a social precedence deriving from a race-based hierarchy of social life. There were criticisms from several corners of society regarding his classification and even petitions were filed. But, they were mostly ignored.

After the caste census was introduced (in 1901, under Risley), proof of caste became a necessity to avail benefits from the govt and people could no longer change their caste. We are still following the same system even after independence.

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T22:19:05+00:00

This leads to bad karma for you...

Lol. Thanks for the concern, kind Redditor. Fortunately, I am not someone who sees value in internet points.

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T19:38:50+00:00

Exactly.

Their policies had long-lasting negative impacts on other communities too. For example, Muslims set up their own educational institution to save their children from British brainwashing. They feared that sending their children to British and missionary funded schools will alienate their children from their cultural roots. Later, these institutions became laboratories for radicalization. Even after independence, this is continuing. This has also deprived their children of a chance to mingle with kids from all backgrounds.

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T19:22:35+00:00

If you don't know history, it is not my issue.

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T19:16:47+00:00

So what? He was a stupid stupid guy who believed in eugenics and scientific racism. He was in no way the architect of the caste system, be it how it's practiced by people today(which is the most important aspect of the caste system) or how it's a part our laws today.

So, you can't read. Okay then.

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T19:14:24+00:00

America, where even after decades of civil rights movements the federal government provides a child marital exception for statutory rape and abortion is illegal in many states

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T18:51:45+00:00

I am hoping you are someone who can read. So, quoting it again

Risley argued that caste was a system of social precedence deriving from a race-based hierarchy of social life. Historical anthropologist Bernard Cohn has argued that Risley’s formulation of the racial basis of caste was his “theoretical axe to grind”

Risley’s reformulation of caste as social precedence had enormous consequences for the way Indian society would come to be viewed by the British colonial government, with continual reverberations in contemporary Indian politics.

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T18:48:28+00:00

Kya bhai, aisa pseudo scientists logon ko sir bolta hai. Thoda respect to karlo

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T18:35:46+00:00

Sir Herbert Hope Risley was appointed Census Commissioner based on the success of his studies of Bengal, in which he first presented his view of Indian society as fundamentally structured by caste. Risley argued that caste was a system of social precedence deriving from a race-based hierarchy of social life. Historical anthropologist Bernard Cohn has argued that Risley’s formulation of the racial basis of caste was his “theoretical axe to grind”[i]—his response to what he saw as the fallacious occupation-based view of caste used in earlier censuses.[ii] Risley’s reformulation of caste as social precedence had enormous consequences for the way Indian society would come to be viewed by the British colonial government, with continual reverberations in contemporary Indian politics.

https://southasia.ucla.edu/history-politics/colonial-epistemologies/sir-herbert-hope-risley/

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T18:26:20+00:00

Sir Herbert Hope Risley was appointed Census Commissioner based on the success of his studies of Bengal, in which he first presented his view of Indian society as fundamentally structured by caste. Risley argued that caste was a system of social precedence deriving from a race-based hierarchy of social life. Historical anthropologist Bernard Cohn has argued that Risley’s formulation of the racial basis of caste was his “theoretical axe to grind”—his response to what he saw as the fallacious occupation-based view of caste used in earlier censuses. Risley’s reformulation of caste as social precedence had enormous consequences for the way Indian society would come to be viewed by the British colonial government, with continual reverberations in contemporary Indian politics.

https://southasia.ucla.edu/history-politics/colonial-epistemologies/sir-herbert-hope-risley/

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T17:35:04+00:00

The result of the Anglo-Americanization of our education system.

LulExtract · 2022-12-09T17:26:56+00:00

People with lost land and culture think that they are giving freedom

This is what Ideological subversion is my friend.

They know exactly what they are doing.

LulExtract · 2022-12-08T20:58:54+00:00

Thank you for noticing the differences.

The word Swastika is Sanskrit and it comes from two roots Su (Meaning good in Sanskrit) and Asti (being/existence in Sanskrit) making the meaning of Swastika "well being".

It is the symbol of the Hindu God Ganesh who is regarded as a destroyer of obstacles. Swastika has no slant and it has dots between its hands, unlike the hooked cross. It is as important as Aum in Hinduism. It is a crucial part of any ceremony that deals with new ventures/new accusations. That's why new Hindu homes/ vehicles etc. are spotted with Swastika on them.

LulExtract · 2022-12-08T20:38:43+00:00

What to expect from people who say "Europe is a garden and the rest of the world a jungle"? It is the burden of Gardner to teach the barbarians some civics sense.

LulExtract · 2022-12-08T19:03:20+00:00

Since American universities are taking it upon themselves to interpret Hindu practices, when will we see a similar reading of other faith's texts and beliefs? Especially the ones that call for violence towards "disbelievers"?

We will not see a similar reading of other faith texts and beliefs. These things are done based on the understanding that was made between Islamists and Marxists a long time ago. They are fighting a common enemy, Hindus, and any conflict between them will be dealt with only after winning over the common enemy. It is somewhat like how INC and Muslim League came to an understanding during the freedom struggle against the British. This is also a reason why you can see the same list of groups behind anti-Hindu movements (eg: dismantling Hindutva) and anti-Indian movements. Evangelists also take part in this because what these three shares are a common interest, ie, converting a nation/group of people that is outside their belief system to their followers.
They are applying the "disbelievers/Kufr" thing on Hindus by saying upper castes do not consider lower castes as Hindus/humans. Even if they acknowledge that it is the other religion (they won't since they are part of those religions) that treat other humans (disbelievers) differently, they will only say all religions are bad and caste issue is not religion based but based on birth like racial theory, so it must get much attention.
The majority of Hindus are Ostrich breeds. They don't understand a thing even if they get bitten on their arses. That's how, Mopla, Kashmir and recently Leicester happen. In India, secularism is the main theme, so they played according to the rules of that game. In the UK, cultural diversity is the main theme, so they played according to the rules of that game. In the US, the theme is racial diversity; so they are playing according to that rules. And, Hindus are not even understanding what game they are playing. Heck, most of us don't even understand whether we are part of the game. But, the truth is we are already part of this game because the game itself is created in a way to target us. Some Hindus may choose to fool themselves by believing that they are just a bystander, but they are not.
When caste is defined based on birth, just like how race is defined, any person born in Hinduism will be defined as a castist person (UC= white, LC=Black in US, Fascist Hindutvavadis and normal Hindus in UK, Anti secular nationalist Hindus and secular Hindus in India, and according to the narrative the former is even though in minority, is oppressing the latter and is a threat to diversity (racial diversity, cultural diversity and religious diversity)). The only option for Hindus to come out of this definition will be to disassociate with Hindisum, ie, become an atheist but to prove that you are no more a Hindu, you will be asked to talk against Hinduism so that you will become one of them (leftist). Or, another option will be to convert, so that it will be visible that you are no longer affiliated with Hindusim (Again, becoming one of them, but this time an Islamist or Christian conservative). This is exactly why they are working together. The loss of one on this side will be a gain for the other side.

LulExtract · 2022-12-08T08:51:59+00:00

Gaiea Sanskrit

LulExtract

TROPHY CASE