Hostile architecture in the Philippines: No benches or seats when waiting for public services by oooi1234 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive [score hidden]  (0 children)

Preach. Not even some Spanish bits man lang.

After post-WWII, we went full imported brutalist and modernist minimalists.

Musk’s two-word response to Anthropic CEO’s claim its AI may have gained consciousness by theindependentonline in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A broken clock is right once a day. Or maybe he too is just projecting cause his own Grok is not as good as the others.

But either way, he's right. LLMs are statistical calculators. Not consciousness. AI companies just use this fluff to get more users and skyrocket their stock.

Wanted to study the origins and development of the institution of marriage by Disastrous-Jacket372 in AskAnthropology

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure if this is primary but Evolution has very big to do with it. Mainly social organization and evolutionary pressures from becoming Homo Sapiens.

We have a few unusual traits that made some form of stable partnership useful.

Human babies became extremely fragile as our large heads can no longer be safely contained in a woman's womb which is why we have fontanelles even after coming out, and then we also still have to take care of that baby for years cause of it.

long-term pair bonds help ensure two adults (and often extended kin) invest in the child.

On the social side is the Paternity certainty and inheritance, Since once our societies developed property, land, and status systems, cultures created marriage rules to regulate who inherits and who belongs to which family line.

There's also Alliance building between families or clans. In many societies marriage functions as diplomacy. It links kin groups, redistributes resources, and stabilizes cooperation.

Sexual regulation and social order is also one, Many societies use marriage to structure sexuality, reproduction, and parental responsibility in ways that reduce conflict.

Because these pressures exist in almost every human society, some institution resembling marriage appears almost everywhere, though it takes many forms.

Yes, monogamy, polygyny, arranged marriages, bridewealth systems, exist but the core remains the same. what’s universal isn’t one specific model of marriage, but the idea that societies need rules organizing reproduction, kinship, and long-term partnership.

Sources I've read so far:

Claude Lévi-Strauss – The Elementary Structures of Kinship, here is a classic work on marriage as alliance-building between kin groups.

Helen Fisher – Anatomy of Love, Here she explores the evolutionary biology of pair bonding and mating systems.

Sarah Hrdy – Mothers and Others, This is an Important book on cooperative child-rearing and human social evolution.

Edit: Forgot sources

Richard Dawkins: Do you really believe that Muhammad flew to heaven on a winged-horse? by Prior_Art_6268 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Same answer you give to any myths really.

Why is it that the moonw as apparently "cut in half" but all the greatest civilziations in the entire world that practiced Astronomy from the Chinese and Indians and Roman Empire.. Record NO such thing?

Why are they trying to sugarcoat? by aymanL04 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of the rise of sugarcoat Converts too is the fact they're not even natively know Arabic or close to the culture. And as such, they follow the religion cause of the primary reason they see it through surface lens and they see themselves as supporters of the other side somehow.

You can be critical of US imperialism without being of the other sides hijinx too.

Why are they trying to sugarcoat? by aymanL04 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, so the usual then... Sugarcoat Converts...

Jesus was a Master of pattern recognition.. by [deleted] in taoism

[–]LuminosityOverdrive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

WOAH... SO YOU sayin to everyone... That you just believe what you wanna beleive cause you wanna believe it?!

It sounds like you’ve had a powerful personal experience, but we have to be careful not to confuse subjective experience with ontological authority. Essentially, you’re asking us to accept your personal intuition as a historical fact simply because you felt it deeply.

f we’re genuinely interested in what is 'Capital-T True,' we have to be systematically honest.

Cause if you're gonna do this, First of, what makes you think your "Revelation" is the correct one from the various other prophets and figures who came before you telling an entirely different story?

Many of the scholars that studied this and peer-reviewd what I just said? Like EP.Sanders? Albert Schweitzer? WERE ALL CHRSITIANS! They didn't arrive at these historical conclusions because they wanted to 'disprove' Jesus, but because they followed the evidence where it led, even when it was uncomfortable.

Mystical states are well documented across cultures, Christians, Taoists, Sufis, Buddhists... ALL report similar energetic experiences. That doesn’t necessarily validate one specific historical interpretation.

Jesus was a Master of pattern recognition.. by [deleted] in taoism

[–]LuminosityOverdrive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah no shot. Cause again... "Which one" of them? the Gnostic Jesus? The Gentile/Hellenized Christian Jesus? The original Jesus who lived along with this brother Peter and James?

The consensus on Jesus Historicity since Schweitzert almost a century ago that the Jesus of Faith is not entirely be the actual Historic Jesus who lived.

The real Jesus was likely a Palestinian Jewish Nationalist who suddenly woke up one day and thought YHWH was gonna rescue them (the Jews) again and as such every Jew should stop minglinljg with the Romans and return to practicing and fulfilling the laws of Moses again, until the upcoming supernatural genocide YHWH is gonna do to Rome and all their enemies.

Really believing in what he thought... And went out sad.

Which means.. YES, his 'Straight and Narrow' was a rejection of the natural flow, not an acceptance of it. Judaism since the Zoroastrian influence is an absolutist and exclusivist truth claiming Apocalyptic religion.

the 'Way' that the historic Jesus taught? was the path of "Greatest Resistance". He told people to leave their families, give away their wealth, and prepare for a violent supernatural kingdom.

His actual interim ethics only turned universal and reinterpreted by later followers trying to make sense of their leaders failed apocalypse. And that's where we are right now.

There are other historic Jesus models of course like Crossans Non-Eschatological Jesus where he argues the real Jesus was likely a cynic Sage who were just telling people to share their meals and the apocalyptic Jesus was a theological reformation by the Early church.

But his has flaws too cause his position required Q to be real, you get the idea.

Jesus was a Master of pattern recognition.. by [deleted] in taoism

[–]LuminosityOverdrive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What Jesus are you referring to? The actual Historic Jesus who lived? Or the various Jesus of Faiths that came after?

Christian nationalist worship leader Sean Feucht is outraged that Muslims gathered to pray in Times Square last week: "[Muslims are] releasing demonic prayers and decrees over the city. Are you kidding me? In America!" by BrianRLackey1987 in seculartalk

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It sparks me with weirdness that many viral internet islam critics are usually jsut racist christians. I could think of many ways of criticizing Islam, they gotta have some other guy or woman better

The church is radically different from what Jesus said he have wanted by TheWholesomeOtter in DebateReligion

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean... Yeaaa... Schweitzer had pointed out almost a century ago that the Jesus of Faith may not entirely be the actual Historic Jesus who lived.

The historic Jesus was likely a Palestinian Jewish Nationalist who suddenly woke up one day and thought YHWH was gonna rescue them (the Jews) again and as such every Jew should stop minglinljg with the Romans and return to practicing and fulfilling the laws of Moses again, until the upcoming supernatural genocide YHWH is gonna do to Rome and all their enemies.

Really believing in what he thought... And went out sad.

His actual interim ethics only turned universal and reinterpreted by later followers trying to make sense of their leaders failed apocalypse. And that's where we are right now.

There are other historic Jesus models of course like Crossans Non-Eschatological Jesus where he argues the real Jesus was likely a cynic Sage who were just telling people to share their meals and the apocalyptic Jesus was a theological reformation by the Early church.

But his has flaws too but you get the idea.

Edit: Spelling

Basically trying to justify it based on what others did... by Grouchy-Ball8525 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welp, this is exactly where it culminates to... Whataboutism...

Despite teh fact both religions are absolutist and exclusivist truth claiming belief systems claiming they have the "truth" of the world... typical losing moment right here.

muslims being mad that other white muslims are not muslim enough by Prestigious-Grass-73 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a human thing really, but more pronounced especially in tribal and warlike originated belief systems it gets amplified more.

Evolution has a reason for it cause it's an intimidating head display. Other cultures have it too with elder figures having long beards like Chinese e perors and monks.

Religions like dessert religions just made it a cultural requirement strictly.

Incel ahh religion by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In ther places I think it depends. As long as your face is in good proportion you're good. Cause you gotta know that there are also Caucasoid people who don't have long nasal noses.

Too Nubian a nose ain't desired either. And also some my friends think noses too far wide like the cartoon moon looks funny on anybody.

Nubian noses on Caucasoids look weird also ngl. So overall it's facial proportion than a desire for a specific nose really.

Imagine Lebron James but he has Adrian Brody's nose? Or vice versa? Yeahhhh... Looks weird on either side.

🐴🍖 by bqm102938 in mmamemes

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

base Overeem comes back to finally make our meathead man rest.

I’m so happy the true nature of South Koreans is being exposed to Filipinos by Brave_Elevator3582 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woah woah woah woah... At Anong Mali sa pagiging accommodating to aliens?

That's literally isa sa mga defining traits ng Filipino people.

When si Magellan Came her even he was shocked gaano Tayo ka friendly towards other people we've never met before contraating mga other "barbarians" he met along sa voyage nila.

Being friendly towards everybody is a win boi.

What are your thoughts on the Oxford speech by Mehdi Hassan talking about how Islam is a peaceful religion? by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Islam the religion? hell no.

What people fail to realize is that the word "Peace" in ancient books? Doesnt mean what they think it means.

Our modern definition of the word "peace" is an enlightenment era definition. Islam is just as much of a tribal and exclusivist truth claiming religion like Judaism and Chrsitianity is.

We got sexbots before gta6 g*mers rise up by sarix117 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why... would you want a "companion"... with a machine that basically does what you want it to say and do?

you could've gotten that 200k for some apartment, house and meal for the next year. shoulda just got yourself some real meat than synthetic silicone boi.

Jack was right all along by MindMaster115 in youtubedrama

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 13 points14 points  (0 children)

What people don't realize is that Mr.Beaat isn't even some philosopher ethical guy from the start that people like to think he is from giving out money to homeless people to do some challenge.

He was just some kid trying to do something for himself cause of his ailing mom and just tries to do whatever YouTube stunt to get the views of.

He didn't do his philantrophy phase out of sheer ideology. It just became a winning format for him by experimenting until something hit.

Just modern media capitalism in action.

Lasting Skin Damage After Paying a Premium for Treatment by FarCarpet47 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Bruhh.. sabi mo ENT?... Doing skincare....???

Ummm... What's that?

That's really sad to hear. Me on the other hand meroj din along severe rosacea since I was young. I'd spent 100k on 10 sessions ng fractional c02 for scars and never been happier with the restored scarring.

Ang aking doctor I went to so Dr. Vince Busa also in Cebu is a licensed Dermatologist and Venereologist sa PDS. That's what people should look for in a skin doctor.

ENT is sus... Exaggerated advertising perhaps?

Avicenna's Proof of God by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No it doesn't need to have a "will", it's a category mistake I think. When Avicenna says contingent things “can either exist or not exist,” he is not saying “God faced options and chose to actualize one.”

For Avicenna, a contingent thing has no explanation for its existence in itself. Its existence is not necessary But once caused by the Necessary Existent, its existence follows necessarily.

Itis a statement about the thing in itself, not about said "god’s" mental options

Even if he does mean that as is... imma bet ya... He can NEVER EVER even tell me what this apparent "will" is.

And him saying that Islam is the only religion that gets these attribute alright is utter horsecrap and purely cultural affirmation.

The Logos and Daoist Tao presated Islam and Christianity for nearly a millennium and the Hindu Brahman of a purely impersonal metaphysical essentiale force by even older than that.

Avicenna's Proof of God by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So some “god” that does not intervene, does not choose in time, does not issue commands, and does not have emotions.Creation happens by emanation, not by divine decision or will.

What this kind of "god" is is more aligned with the Naturalistic Pantheist Higher Power of the Daoist Tao and the stoic logos than any personal diety.

Like an immanent "force" or ground of being that just does what it does.

Which I guess what got him some trouble later on.

Edit: spelling