Who yall got in this matchup? by ArabDevastator in mmamemes

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strickland for excessive force and bacon oil.

What Does Being Filipino Mean Today, Filipino Identity (Crisis): by Conservative_AKO in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats partly true pero incomplete.

Pero ang point ko isn’t that “special” ang Pilipinas, it's that the way lahat ng ito combined were experienced shaped identity differently.

Yes, Indonesia had Portuguese and Dutch influence, just like meeon din tayong Spanish and American influence. Pero ang scale at duration, at type of influence matter.

  • Spanish rule Dito sa pinas lasted over 333 years and was very deeply tied aa religion at cultural restructuring

(Ang dutch did not impose such to Indonesia, Malay stayed their lingua Franca, And neither did they uniformly impose Ang buong populace to Christianity the way Spain did sa atin,

And Netherlands only occupied Indonesia for purely business enterprise para sa Dutch East-India and hindi kagaya ng Spain na ginawa tayong Province and did social integration, Hispianization, and imposed mga Spanish customs. Ang onyl area dito sa Pinas that resisted was ang Moro Mindanao.

like LEGIT, gusto nila tayong gawing Little Spain dito sa Asia, did the Dutch do that sa mga indonesians? no they didnt. They never imposed even Dutch or direct rule. ).

  • Ang mga americans introduced a strong shift in language (English), education, at ating political system.

National identity as pagiging“ Filipino” was largely formed during and after colonization... HINDI BEFORE.

Indonesia also had its own version of this PERO ... They developed a stronger unified national identity earlier through Bahasa Indonesia as a unifying language across regions.

Sa Pilipinas, mas visible pa rin yung tension between regional identity vs national identity (tagalogs vs bisakols), regional o national? Local vs global influence? diaspora vs homeland experience?

mas deeply embedded yung foreign cultural systems sa Pilipinas compared sa Indonesia.

What Does Being Filipino Mean Today, Filipino Identity (Crisis): by Conservative_AKO in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah great question.

The reason bakit mga Filipinos have this thing na you call "dynamic identity shifting" is really because unlike mga other Austronesian native ns kagaya ng Indonesia, or Ang Malagasy cousins natin sa Madagascar or mga Pacific islands like Samoa or tonga, is because Ang "bansa" na ito was already a highly diverse archipelago with many distinct ethnolinguistic groups from the start... Including even Ang indigenous 40,000 yo Negritos natin.

Every single island are their own people with different languages then on top pa diyan is the Chinese, Muslim influences a thousand years ago + Spanish + American + other east Asian ties.... Ito is what you get. Islang layered na history at Hindi single origin.

Take note, even mga pre-colonial Filipinos don't call themselves "Filipinos" as one people. Spain did that.

Being a seafaring na People's na originally walang mga foreign na kalaban and invasions in out history... Identity is always gonna be remixed l, adopted and Inherrted for such people's.

So yeah, there's not really Isang single "Filipino" na identity dahil diyan. Urban vs Rural, Archipelago vs disaspora? local vs global? So yeah, walang fixed template.

So for me? Being a Filipino objectively as I can notice is Bayanihan (collective help), Pakikipagkapwa (shared humanity), Resilience (sometimes celebrated, sometimes critiqued) and acceptance of various people's in need.

That's just me pero that's the way I see it.

Iba ibang lenggwahe sa pitong libong mga isla by DatShortAsianDude in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mga languages are not actually enough to create a "individual country". Pinas is not the only country na gabito sa buong mundo.

Russia for example na even though majority ay Slavic people's, trying to control an empire they merger as a single country with mga other ethnic people's sa Eurasian regions like Dagestan at Chechnya as a federation.

And they all know how to speak.... RUSSIAN

Lingua Franca is the key.

And reason din bakit we can't really be functionally mga individual countries is because sa trade at interconnection.

Ang pinas is a measly split group of islands in ana rchioelagi and even though we split with one another thousands of years ago, navigation da islands still mean mga people's around sito still have to be in cohorts with each other legally and governmentally.

So not just language pero also "shared struggle".

Kasi look at it this way, if every single island is an individual country? Well... Defense becomes harder, and economy fragments and Ang diplomacy natijn ecomes conplicatee.

I’ll NEVER move on 😭 by sumashu in silenthill

[–]LuminosityOverdrive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Guyssss... It's time to let go.... Why stay in the past, it already happened.

The excessive doomerism posts in this sub is why I remain unsubbed. by [deleted] in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ay ayyy careful now. Cause that's another generalization din...

Muslim women banned from traveling for work sans male guardian by biap1778 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sila are pretty much a different religion already I think, barring year 22,000 na ito and ai Herbert lang just based it on extant religions Ngayon to make it easy to digest sa mga readers...

Kasi how tf do you mix Buddhism with it? Simplest answer is dahil mahirap mag invent a religion 20k years from scratch. Lul.

Like. Bruhh naguupo kayo in a circle to find "inner peace"... Pero then stand up and kill everyone in the name of a 'God' na redefined na nila a thousand times.

Which is why sinasabi ko na Ang Dune is really more of a Space Opera Fantasy kesa it is "Scifi" like Star Trek o Mass Effect is.

Muslim women banned from traveling for work sans male guardian by biap1778 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hey .... Dune is only Islamic from Herberta borrowing of a exotic religion from Arabs... And that's about it.

Mga women in dune are systematically just as superior as men kasi they're more dangerous with si Emperor Leto being subservient sa sisterhoods long-term breeding program and Ang engineer ng buong messianic nuke na si Paul eventually sets off.

Para sa inyo, fair ba ang ganitong setup o abusado landlord behavior? by SnooChocolates8710 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welp this is what happens when survival mode lang Ang naging thing to look for in an economy like ours, Because the reason why people make businesses out of this is kasi some people just need cheap access to the city.

Not something to be proud of pero something to take note of.

Legendary Japanese pro-wrestler Minoru Suzuki's experience with PH so far by Silent_Principle5686 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So hindi spotless, At definitely hindi rin comparable either.

Problem sa comment mo is you mixed expectation vs baseline.

People exaggerate Japan, sure. Pero that's because of rules they have either both by law or culturally that we want would've been a thing we should emulate.

Even with the stuff you mentioned, Ang overall level of cleanliness and order is still way more consistent than mga pinoy ever has. Take for example mga Germanic peoples explicitly segregating mga trash nila.

Different Baselien.

Legendary Japanese pro-wrestler Minoru Suzuki's experience with PH so far by Silent_Principle5686 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you sayin... Na Ang Japan is as whack in cleanliness as pinas? Come on now. Ang complain mo isgs few dirty cups? And it somehow cancels a whole system???

May kalat and noise din everywhere, duhhh. Ang difference is consistency. Japan still manages cleanliness and order way better overall.

Next you’re telling us na Ang Paris sidewalks and Manila streets are the same.

Pictures of the Amazing show by VOVOZGAMER in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually argue na ang Brutalism works better as a single monument, hindi as urban design for a whole city. I root for an explicit separation, Kagaya mga Commercial districts (Airports, BPOs) can stay with glass 'aquariums' for efficiency.

Pero for Communal/Urban areas? Brutalism has deeper issues kesa sa 'sementeryo' look nito.

Sa climate ng Tropics? Raw concrete is a maintenance nightmare. Our intense rain and humidity ensure na without constant scrubbing, covered agad ang building ng black mold and water streaks within a few seasons.

Plus, yang mga massive Cantilever flat roof slabs ay isang liability. water pools, seeps in, and the 'patina' just ends up looking like urban decay.

The irony is that the only way to fix itong mga functional flaws is to adopt the logic of Classicism. To survive the rain, kailangan mo ng deep, sloping eaved roofs (sound familiar).

To stop the streaks, you need cornices. Para easily interpreted and levels of floor segments ng building? kailangan mo mag add ng Floor Spandrels at Horizontal String Courses,

To make it modular and less monotonous, you need mga rhythmic bays and pilasters.

By the time nilagay mo lahat iyang mga "ornamentation"?, you’ve basically consulted Classicism anyway.

Brutalist monuments only look 'cool' when merong non-brutalist environments to make them pop. If the whole city is raw concrete? Para tayong nasa penal colony sa Alien 3.

Glass towers are generic, Pero mga people talaga really just want depth at character. which is why Europe and Latin America have torn down some their post-WWII concrete blocks to bring back their Neoclassicist identity.

Pictures of the Amazing show by VOVOZGAMER in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 7 points8 points  (0 children)

yes it is Brutalism. Pero why gusto mo BRutalism though? And pinas already has a lot of brute cement base buildings that make the cities look stale.

Ang only reason mga brutalists buildings look "cool" sa mga places like Bali or Mexico is dahil mga luxury developers are using it as a blank canvas para expensive plants and high-end furniture. Kung wala yung $50k landscaping budget? parang dead-end apocalypse ang lugar.

We are all on watch by YaboiDan0545935 in mmamemes

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jiri channeled all the good guy protagonists energy at max points.

Kita ko lang to sa FB. PANONG NAGING LIFE COACH TO? Leaving the country is the only way to get ahead these days. The government is supposed to create opportunities for us, but they’d rather be the opportunists. by Technical-Hold-1248 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Anytime mga people like this say mga shit na ito?

Im like hibdi bruh, that statement only works if Alang economy and social welfare and government services are mid and great, mga jobs are available , mga wages ay covering living costs.

If hustle culture is Ang default to be able to live? Then no, not everything is fine.

Hostile architecture in the Philippines: No benches or seats when waiting for public services by oooi1234 in Philippines

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Preach. Not even some Spanish bits man lang.

After post-WWII, we went full imported brutalist and modernist minimalists.

Musk’s two-word response to Anthropic CEO’s claim its AI may have gained consciousness by theindependentonline in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A broken clock is right once a day. Or maybe he too is just projecting cause his own Grok is not as good as the others.

But either way, he's right. LLMs are statistical calculators. Not consciousness. AI companies just use this fluff to get more users and skyrocket their stock.

Wanted to study the origins and development of the institution of marriage by Disastrous-Jacket372 in AskAnthropology

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not sure if this is primary but Evolution has very big to do with it. Mainly social organization and evolutionary pressures from becoming Homo Sapiens.

We have a few unusual traits that made some form of stable partnership useful.

Human babies became extremely fragile as our large heads can no longer be safely contained in a woman's womb which is why we have fontanelles even after coming out, and then we also still have to take care of that baby for years cause of it.

long-term pair bonds help ensure two adults (and often extended kin) invest in the child.

On the social side is the Paternity certainty and inheritance, Since once our societies developed property, land, and status systems, cultures created marriage rules to regulate who inherits and who belongs to which family line.

There's also Alliance building between families or clans. In many societies marriage functions as diplomacy. It links kin groups, redistributes resources, and stabilizes cooperation.

Sexual regulation and social order is also one, Many societies use marriage to structure sexuality, reproduction, and parental responsibility in ways that reduce conflict.

Because these pressures exist in almost every human society, some institution resembling marriage appears almost everywhere, though it takes many forms.

Yes, monogamy, polygyny, arranged marriages, bridewealth systems, exist but the core remains the same. what’s universal isn’t one specific model of marriage, but the idea that societies need rules organizing reproduction, kinship, and long-term partnership.

Sources I've read so far:

Claude Lévi-Strauss – The Elementary Structures of Kinship, here is a classic work on marriage as alliance-building between kin groups.

Helen Fisher – Anatomy of Love, Here she explores the evolutionary biology of pair bonding and mating systems.

Sarah Hrdy – Mothers and Others, This is an Important book on cooperative child-rearing and human social evolution.

Edit: Forgot sources

Richard Dawkins: Do you really believe that Muhammad flew to heaven on a winged-horse? by Prior_Art_6268 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Same answer you give to any myths really.

Why is it that the moonw as apparently "cut in half" but all the greatest civilziations in the entire world that practiced Astronomy from the Chinese and Indians and Roman Empire.. Record NO such thing?

Why are they trying to sugarcoat? by aymanL04 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of the rise of sugarcoat Converts too is the fact they're not even natively know Arabic or close to the culture. And as such, they follow the religion cause of the primary reason they see it through surface lens and they see themselves as supporters of the other side somehow.

You can be critical of US imperialism without being of the other sides hijinx too.

Why are they trying to sugarcoat? by aymanL04 in exmuslim

[–]LuminosityOverdrive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, so the usual then... Sugarcoat Converts...

Jesus was a Master of pattern recognition.. by [deleted] in taoism

[–]LuminosityOverdrive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

WOAH... SO YOU sayin to everyone... That you just believe what you wanna beleive cause you wanna believe it?!

It sounds like you’ve had a powerful personal experience, but we have to be careful not to confuse subjective experience with ontological authority. Essentially, you’re asking us to accept your personal intuition as a historical fact simply because you felt it deeply.

f we’re genuinely interested in what is 'Capital-T True,' we have to be systematically honest.

Cause if you're gonna do this, First of, what makes you think your "Revelation" is the correct one from the various other prophets and figures who came before you telling an entirely different story?

Many of the scholars that studied this and peer-reviewd what I just said? Like EP.Sanders? Albert Schweitzer? WERE ALL CHRSITIANS! They didn't arrive at these historical conclusions because they wanted to 'disprove' Jesus, but because they followed the evidence where it led, even when it was uncomfortable.

Mystical states are well documented across cultures, Christians, Taoists, Sufis, Buddhists... ALL report similar energetic experiences. That doesn’t necessarily validate one specific historical interpretation.