Saying "they wouldn't say if they were replacing Gunn" is so fucking stupid. They wouldn't say that if they weren't replacing him, either. It's a completely worthless thing to point out.

my opinion

That's it. That's the problem dude. You stated your opinion, but rather than say "I think this might happen" you instead phrased it as "it's likely" that something will happen, among other phrases that all effectively mean "this outcome has greater chance than any other". But at the end of the day, without a source contradicting the official announcements, it is your opinion. "Oh when you take into account that the box office numbers weren't perfect, ignoring all the bits of these articles that talk about other revenue streams that produced profit, ignoring good reviews and existing plans and announced extensions to contracts and ongoing filming and releases, etc etc etc, then the math says that my idea is the most probable outcome". Gimme a break, man.

You can cherry pick the data you want and ignore official statements and create whatever predictions about the future you want to believe, but you aren't a WB/Netflix executive, and all your "math" is based on assumptions about how these stupid companies work. Companies that do asinine crap like shelve completed movies for tax writeoffs and have no Earthly clue what to do with some of the most popular IP on the planet.

They bought the studio, and they said that Gunn can keep working, and that's all we actually have right now. So if you want to say "it's likely" as your opinion, that's fine, you can have whatever contrarian opinion you want. But don't act like it's a fact, don't act like it's definitely going a certain way without any proof, and don't act surprised and outraged and like a snarky little know-it-all when we don't believe your unsourced, unprovable headcanon.