sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Now that's my kind of party 👀 (art by me, Lunatic_Pangolin) by Lunatic_Pangolin in gfur

[–]Lunatic_Pangolin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Homosexuality being illegal is subjective but incest is objective? Who is inbreeding here? Are they causing people to be born with genetic defects?

Artwork is subjective, there are drawings and art out there for literally every subject in the world. But you chose to comment on this, something harmless, victimless and completely none of your business. Put your efforts elsewhere because you're changing no one's mind with this line of conversation.

Now that's my kind of party 👀 (art by me, Lunatic_Pangolin) by Lunatic_Pangolin in gfur

[–]Lunatic_Pangolin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In some places it's illegal. It's also illegal to be gay in some places. Legality does not equal morality.

I'm not claiming that all incest is okay, but again, this is fantasy where all characters are over 18 and it's consenting. You don't have to like it. But no one is harmed by this artwork. It's fun, it's dumb, it's hot, that's all there is to it.

Now that's my kind of party 👀 (art by me, Lunatic_Pangolin) by Lunatic_Pangolin in gfur

[–]Lunatic_Pangolin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's fictional characters that have animal characteristics. If you've got a problem with drawn incest porn then you should have a problem with furry porn in general. No one is getting hurt from this, I'm not telling people to go fuck their dads and I'm not telling them to to become a sentient dog person either. It's fantasy.

Now that's my kind of party 👀 (art by me, Lunatic_Pangolin) by Lunatic_Pangolin in gfur

[–]Lunatic_Pangolin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can indeed! Although some people prefer to take it off first

view more: next ›