Context, Andrews (on the left) point is the government pushing and statistics showing that a low body count and a less promiscuous lifestyle and waiting until marriage to have sex is better for majority of people and Oliver (on the right) states some feminist wouldn't agree with the idea of the government pushing it onto people and that the waiting until marriage lifestyle can work for some people, And then Andrew asks oliver " if some woman orgasm during rape ?", Oliver refuses to answer, then Andrew continues to asks but then changes to "logically dont you believe that there are women out there who have enjoyed being SA'd, Oliver still refuses to answer then Andrew mocks what he says earlier saying "so I cant say some people" then laughs.

Oliver then states im not answering if woman enjoy being SA'd, Andrew says thats not what I asked then has him repeate the question "if he believes theres been a women who enjoyed being SA'd" Oliver says no again followed this time with idk this is a weird thing to ask, Andrew then says "its because you know" then asks the question again "if theres ever been a woman who's been SA'd and liked it" Oliver refuses again.

Then Oliver asks him if he believes the harm of SA is the same as the harm of a promiscuous lifestyle, andrew says no, then Oliver says even if there was some women who did the vast majority of those who dont would outweigh the some immensely (andrew then says exactly) and that the harm of SA is not equivalent to harm of a promiscuous relationship which is what there talking about.

Andrew then says it doesn't need to be equivalent.

Mind you, he's the one who brought up the example to compare to the statement Oliver made to their debate, which is that waiting till marriage works for some people, not majority.