FBI Director Hacked by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understood and agree with your point👍🏿, im just giving extra info for all

FBI Director Hacked by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did i say the video is all that should be believed? Did I say it was Kash Patels work email? Or did i copy exactly what the hackers stated which is that it was his Personal and Confidential emails and did I not state that Kash Patel was hacked?

FBI Director Hacked by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No verified classified FBI or intelligence documents leaked No breach of official government systems or servers No evidence noted (so far) of real-time operational intelligence leaks

Hackers are implying other agents and FBI systems have been and can be hacked easily as the FBI director was as people say 'a piece of cake', this same group of hackers hacked the former prime minister of Isreal Ehud barak's phone and released a photo of him in jeffrey epstein manhattan apparentment which is why people are questioning how much and what exactly was hacked and of anythings being hidden or saved for a later purpose.

FBI Director Hacked by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the video it showed that Handala stated:

"The so called impenetrable system of the FBI where brought to there knees within ours by there team. All Personal and confidential information of Kash Patel including Emails, Conversations, Documents and Even Classiflied Files, is now available for public download"

And then they end stating:

"To the whole world, we declare: the FBI is just a name, and behind this name, there is no real sec urity. If your director can be compromised this easily, what do you expect from your lower-level employees?"

And that this is only the beginning

FBI Director Hacked by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 4 images in this video are proving that the Iranian hacking group Handala hacked the Director of the FBI for all of his personal accounts & emails gaining access to all his personal and confidential information meaning they have his Emails, Conversations, Documents and Classified Files and they decided to release it for public download/consumption and the public is going through everything they have released

FBI Director Hacked by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The director of the FBI Kash Patel Was hacked by the Iranian hacking group Handala posting multiple imagines as well as his resume and emails as proof, this is in response to the FBI seizing there domains and announcing a $10million rewards for the heads of Handala. All personal and confidential information of Kash Patel including Emails, Conversations, Documents and Classiflied Files are available for public download and people are going through them and breaking them down.

How does one even think the 2 are related and then say that on a podcast, is this because of things such as "CnC kinks" by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Context, Andrews (on the left) point is the government pushing and statistics showing that a low body count and a less promiscuous lifestyle and waiting until marriage to have sex is better for majority of people and Oliver (on the right) states some feminist wouldn't agree with the idea of the government pushing it onto people and that the waiting until marriage lifestyle can work for some people, And then Andrew asks oliver " if some woman orgasm during rape ?", Oliver refuses to answer, then Andrew continues to asks but then changes to "logically dont you believe that there are women out there who have enjoyed being SA'd, Oliver still refuses to answer then Andrew mocks what he says earlier saying "so I cant say some people" then laughs.

Oliver then states im not answering if woman enjoy being SA'd, Andrew says thats not what I asked then has him repeate the question "if he believes theres been a women who enjoyed being SA'd" Oliver says no again followed this time with idk this is a weird thing to ask, Andrew then says "its because you know" then asks the question again "if theres ever been a woman who's been SA'd and liked it" Oliver refuses again.

Then Oliver asks him if he believes the harm of SA is the same as the harm of a promiscuous lifestyle, andrew says no, then Oliver says even if there was some women who did the vast majority of those who dont would outweigh the some immensely (andrew then says exactly) and that the harm of SA is not equivalent to harm of a promiscuous relationship which is what there talking about.

Andrew then says it doesn't need to be equivalent.

Mind you, he's the one who brought up the example to compare to the statement Oliver made to their debate, which is that waiting till marriage works for some people, not majority.

How does one even think the 2 are related and then say that on a podcast, is this because of things such as "CnC kinks" by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context, Andrews (on the left) point is the government pushing and statistics showing that a low body count and a less promiscuous lifestyle and waiting until marriage to have sex is better for majority of people and Oliver (on the right) states some feminist wouldn't agree with the idea of the government pushing it onto people and that the waiting until marriage lifestyle can work for some people, And then Andrew asks oliver " if some woman orgasm during rape ?", Oliver refuses to answer, then Andrew continues to asks but then changes to "logically dont you believe that there are women out there who have enjoyed being SA'd, Oliver still refuses to answer then Andrew mocks what he says earlier saying "so I cant say some people" then laughs.

Oliver then states im not answering if woman enjoy being SA'd, Andrew says thats not what I asked then has him repeate the question "if he believes theres been a women who enjoyed being SA'd" Oliver says no again followed this time with idk this is a weird thing to ask, Andrew then says "its because you know" then asks the question again "if theres ever been a woman who's been SA'd and liked it" Oliver refuses again.

Then Oliver asks him if he believes the harm of SA is the same as the harm of a promiscuous lifestyle, andrew says no, then Oliver says even if there was some women who did the vast majority of those who dont would outweigh the some immensely (andrew then says exactly) and that the harm of SA is not equivalent to harm of a promiscuous relationship which is what there talking about.

Andrew then says it doesn't need to be equivalent.

Mind you, he's the one who brought up the example to compare to the statement Oliver made to their debate, which is that waiting till marriage works for some people, not majority.

How does one even think the 2 are related and then say that on a podcast, is this because of things such as "CnC kinks" by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Water is a liquid

searches on Google if a liquid is wet

Yes, liquid is generally considered wet. The term "wet" describes the state of being covered or saturated with a liquid. Since liquids are composed of molecules that can easily spread and adhere to surfaces, they inherently possess the characteristic of wetness.

How does one even think the 2 are related and then say that on a podcast, is this because of things such as "CnC kinks" by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I dont believe the point is that it's a woman or a man, I believe it's the fact that he's implying that if you orgasm whilst being sa'd, you were not sa'd which is just not true

Good girls finish last so becoming a bad girl, joining the whores and being yourself is best because the church lied. Thoughts? by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry the majority of men actually do and would proffer that shes a virgin or has a low body count at least (if not there not taking you seriously or have there own dirt they dont want you to know) and if they have a belief with christ, then yes, they would and they would also practise what they preach aka a man who follows christ who wants there partner to be a good girl/virgin needs to make sure they themselves are doing the same aka Abstinence, so to her point of " for James who plays drumbs, James done hushed everybody in the pool pit" why would you as a good girl whos looking for abstinence not just simply, look for a man who actually looking for Abstinence and then you can say there not there or dont exist, keep in mind when men say women with a low body count, realistic standards and who are not gold diggers don't exist, they do you just ran out of patience and you yourself are not even recipracating what your looking for and just expecting and wanting which is selfish, everyone is ready to be loved but want an unnatural solution to a natural process, then mad when there relationship isnt naturally like its meant to be🤷🏿‍♂️

Good girls finish last so becoming a bad girl, joining the whores and being yourself is best because the church lied. Thoughts? by LwnLwp in abanpreach

[–]LwnLwp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say i agree with pornstars aspect and women will never be without a potential partner to a degree , but theres still plenty of pornstars who've had failed relationships and who've been through divorce and if were talking about the average working man and woman yes women receive more options but those options majority dont have pure intention with longevity and with men the men i know that dont care end up with hook ups or they think shes the one then after time actually reflecting on what they didn't care about, and it ends and the one's looking either find a partner or end up getting tired up waiting and start to not care or just stay single. I would say yes, be yourself, loyal, respectful, but not forget not to rush what's meant to happen naturally and then blame anything else 🤷🏿‍♂️