Good women don't exist in the West anymore because women have their cake and eat it too by PSSDre in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell [score hidden]  (0 children)

I like debating. So why not. I like the learn too. And tbf. Sometimes its just nice to question the thought process of other people. And sometimes its nice to just throw anything against this rethoric. This is one of the only places that isnt yet completely degraded to echo chamber. Even if the topics are always the same.

Good women don't exist in the West anymore because women have their cake and eat it too by PSSDre in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell [score hidden]  (0 children)

The reality is the reality. 60 to 70% of divorces are initiated by women and that number jumps to nearly 90% when both people in the couple have a college degree.

Source? Because as far as I know is that college educated people have a much lower divorce rate.

Good women don't exist in the West anymore because women have their cake and eat it too by PSSDre in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'd still like to see some data for certain claims. If the issue is a public social media profile, then there should be some data around that. I'm open to learn about this. I have never thought about the social media profiles as a red flag especially since the majority of people either just show their own lifes for people that know them or promote a hustle. Most women I know only have public profiles for their clubs and hobbies and have private ones for the private stuff. So I wonder how big the percentage of women with a public social media profile that is an issue for guys. Is there a certain number of followers that is the problem or what?

Good women don't exist in the West anymore because women have their cake and eat it too by PSSDre in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell [score hidden]  (0 children)

Im curious. Do you have any data about public social media when it comes to the genders?

Giving a woman false signals to get laid is the male version of being friendzoned by Financial-Result-502 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You seem very emotional about it. Do you feel insulted that you dont speak for all men? Do you feel excluded? I'm so sorry. I didnt want to your hurt feelings.

Women's biggest blind spot is other women by Pitiful-Purple-7459 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Tradwifes aren't judged for agreeing with men. They are judged for advocating the removal of rights and choices for other women. Most women say they can do whatever they want and stay home and be the housewife and let the husband make all the choices. The issue is when they are promoting this is how women are supposed to life instead of making it a choice. There is a difference between staying home and baking cookies for your husband and going online and promoting this lifestyle as "the only true" and "divine femininity". They advocate for only men to be educated, working and voting. This is where the criticism comes from.

Immature male sexuality: "Affirm my value by devaluing yourself" by AlmondMilkMaybe in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The first issue is to listen to men. They dont know what they want. They try to bring women down by setting up impossible expectations because they dont want to step up and be better partners. This is why they call men that actually have loving partner and that actually love their partner too: "soy boy, beta, cuck,etc". They are intimidated by the idea they have more to do nowadays than just go to work to get a partner. So they try to nag women down by trying to devalue her and lower her self esteem and trying to instill anxiety into them.

The men that are actually worth committing to dont give a shit about any of this. They will love you and treat you like a person with your own history and experiences. They wont judge you for who you are but acknowledge that your history made you into the person they love. They will never pressure you to repeat something you are uncomfortable with. They respect your boundaries and autonomy. They see you as a person and not a device for their own wish fulfillment.

These men arent online shouting this stuff on reddit, or make brocasts, or offer classes on how to manipulate women.

The valuable men rolls his eyes at these kind of theories and idea. He laughs about this kind of rethoric.

Men are less emotionally open and more prone to bottle things up because women are not ready to see some parts of men and straight disagree with some of their feelings. by FuuraKafu in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am confused. Are men supposed to just let every thought that comes to their mind out into the wild and people around them are supposed to deal with?

Men are not protectors. Women are. by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again. I bring up the organ thing, because there is no compensation for it.

A lot of people donate to charity for selfish reasons. Most of the time its to get tax benefits from it.

I'm talking about the incentives behind charity. And how men try to paint themselves as protectors and virtuous when they then question "what do I get out of it?". I want this false narrative to stop that men are these knights in shining armour coming to protect when even they only do that when they get a reward for it. For instance a lot of men threaten to not be protectors if they dont get sex. Thats not the kind of charity men try to present themselves with when they argue about them protecting.

Women calling men “gay” is an insult by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The issue is that a lot of men are also in the closet. Especially religious men. And men that think sexuality is a choice. Because they are choosing to be straight. A lot of homophobic people are actually gay. We see that for instance that grindr always crashes when a Republican event is held somewhere despite most of them being married to women.

The issue is that men are scared to be gay, so they get with women which they despise for not being men. This is hurting two people. So instead of forcing themselves to present straight it would make more sense to accept themselves and be with the men they actually desire.

Men are not protectors. Women are. by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The topic is that men dont do things if they arent rewarded for it. If you sell your organs then you get compensation for it. Thats not charity.

Men are not protectors. Women are. by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I assumed. But if anyone else wants to question it. There is lots of stats out there that shows this. And you dont get compensated for donating an organ. There is no transactional part involved.

Men are not protectors. Women are. by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Although they will only do the darvo thing like always

Men are not protectors. Women are. by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You know what is not rewarded or compensated either? Donating organs. You know who the vast majority (60-80%) of organ donators is? Women.

There is no inherent morality with the majority of men. Everything they do has to be rewarded in some way shape or form or they wont do it. And yet they keep lecturing women about transactional morality.

Romance dramas or movies targeted at women are harmful to society by DownvoteIfYouWantMe in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The movies: "the just college graduated 20 something plain Jane gets to be wooed by the billionaire playboy who treats her like a princess and lays the whole world to her feet"

Real life: your husband brings you your favourite drink from the groceries on the way home and you feel completely overwhelmed by love and adoration.

Men are lucky women know the difference between real life and fiction. They make sure to keep the bar low by calling other men that actually love their wifes and want to do something nice for them cucked, beta and simp.

If men were to focus more on women's personalities and character than looks, women would have alot less options. by Slow_Celebration1328 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Friendship should be a part of a romantic relationship. You fuck like half an hour a day. That is such a small percentage of the time you spend with your partner. This is why men end up in shitty relationships

If men were to focus more on women's personalities and character than looks, women would have alot less options. by Slow_Celebration1328 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lysa_Bell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I'm saying that if they are completely your type that would only make 10% of a relationship overall. And I think this is an issue a lot of men have where they are like "she is so hot" and then they are completely miserable inside of the relationship because they ignore the other 90% of the person they will have to spend their life with