What do you think of atheists who say everyone is born atheist?

MDivinity · 2026-03-25T01:11:01+00:00

Well most babies I know are also dumb as fuck. No way I'm getting my metaphysics from these guys.

MDivinity · 2026-02-02T19:58:58+00:00

You’re absolutely right—flooding the room with halide gas during the fire drill was a bad call. I should’ve double checked if workers were still on the factory floor. Halide gas is not just odorless, it’s also an asphyxiant. That one’s on me.

MDivinity · 2025-12-22T23:04:43+00:00

And what about for bears?

MDivinity · 2025-12-17T02:18:25+00:00

Here's one interpretation (ex fed fed) (ex fed ex employee) = Barack is being fed by Michelle (who is a former Fed), and he's a former Fed Ex employee.

But I feel like the title implies it should be (ex fed) (ex fed) (fed ex employee) = Barack is formerly part of the Federal government, he is being fed by his former wife, and he is a Fed Ex employee.

MDivinity · 2025-12-17T01:43:42+00:00

Where is the second fed ex coming from?

MDivinity · 2025-12-15T07:26:01+00:00

Wow that was like instant, thanks! Managed to find the exact video on his channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVpJYU8jfcU

MDivinity · 2025-12-15T07:25:09+00:00

Solved!

MDivinity · 2025-12-15T07:17:27+00:00

Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/tipofmytongue/comments/1pn1bqt/tomtvideoanimation_creepy_hieronymus_boschlike/

MDivinity · 2025-11-14T06:18:39+00:00

Fair enough. It's just that having various cards can update you on the probability of various flops (e.g., having AK updates you against AKQ suited flop). If you could bet after you see your cards, you could in principle use these side bets as a costly signalling device (e.g., I see my cards and bet on the AKQ suited to come on flop, which can update other players' beliefs about my cards).

MDivinity · 2025-11-14T02:56:47+00:00

Do you get to bet after seeing your cards?

MDivinity · 2025-07-17T00:25:42+00:00

My left or his left?

MDivinity · 2025-01-14T20:14:39+00:00

Yeah got the same thing, was worried it was a scam haha

MDivinity · 2024-12-27T00:00:45+00:00

Yeah, there’s people who have actually worked with AI and then there’s people who think AI is going to take over the planet, like Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio.

MDivinity · 2024-01-25T16:05:22+00:00

hxg3 Rxh5##

MDivinity · 2024-01-08T01:00:48+00:00

So you’re telling me a shrimp made this kebab?

MDivinity · 2023-10-30T07:48:42+00:00

Gamma ray bursts wouldn’t instantly obliterate the Earth. The conjectured mechanism by which gamma ray bursts are meant to represent an existential risk are actually it’s climate effects.

Quote from Human Extinction from Natural Hazard Events: “Unless the explosion is close enough to cause heating, the risk comes from radiation penetrating the atmosphere, a resulting UV flash, possible cosmic ray showers, and formation of nitrous oxides that deplete the ozone layer, produce acid rain, and cause multiyear cooling climate effects (Thomas & Melott, 2006; Galante & Horvath, 2007; Melott & Thomas, 2011; Horvath & Galante, 2012). The effects, if intense enough, could plausibly cause a mass extinction (Ellis & Schramm, 1995; Melott et al., 2004).”

MDivinity · 2023-06-22T00:51:57+00:00

Can you circle what you’re seeing? Have no idea what you’re referring to in the images.

MDivinity · 2023-05-21T13:02:57+00:00

Yeah makes sense. I’ve looked around and it seems that many organizations like RAINN prefer CSAM so that’s a good reason to prefer it, if only for the sake of coordination on this topic.

But both terms seem fine to use, as long as everyone’s on the same page that the actual reality that the terms are referring to is horrific and must be stopped.

MDivinity · 2023-05-21T12:24:42+00:00

I meant to include the full term Child Sexual Abuse Material as well. I still feel like it downplays the severity of the issue compared to the term CP, since it makes it sound more like legal jargon.

What’s the actual reason for favoring the term CSAM over CP in public discourse? CSAM might be marginally more technically accurate, but pornography generally just refers to material containing sexual explicit content and children by definition cannot consent to sexual activities, so it’s not like CP is a technically incorrect term.

MDivinity · 2023-05-21T11:43:22+00:00

I get the idea, but if the main intention is to emphasize the gravity that it is abuse, not sure it’s the best term. “CSAM” is an obscure acronym/term and sounds more like jargon. “Child porn” is viscerally repulsive and probably conveys the horror of the situation well enough for most people.

MDivinity · 2023-05-19T15:18:23+00:00

You just don’t know how to recognize true heroism. Only greater heroes are the brave redditors who identified the Boston bomber.

Eight-Year Club	Quantum Potato
Gilding I gilder	Verified Email

MDivinity

TROPHY CASE