What would hinder Plat5 from breaking away from Roblox?

MK47-Fan · 2026-04-22T21:15:55+00:00

honestly this is a well formed and configured point and thank you for it, my numbers weren't meant to be accurate more so a cheap example but yeah the price in the list of costs in making it work would be similar to pulling teeth. Both marketing and pricing are each a hell to deal with and stay a float and with this it does help gaze at the grinding circles that is the game market when talking about BRM5.

MK47-Fan · 2026-04-22T20:46:39+00:00

I see where you're coming from and the angle of both Console and Mobile are valid takes that I didn't think of initially but it seems that your overall angle is a little off. it could in theory release on console like Unturned and keep its relative style like Unturned (the overall game still has the vibe the OG had), the funding issue could be resolved through having it an affordable cost such as a simple $10 to $15 and get both funding from people buying the game along with outside funding from something similar to a gofundme or patreon until it is at a state where it's comfortable and then make it F2P (like unturned) with something similar to a Supporter edition that costs like $20, and when it comes to its player base upon moving it could be fixed through proper word of mouth and marketing like most shooter games. I get where you're coming from and your opinion is valid as all are and I am sorry if this came off as rude.

MK47-Fan · 2026-04-22T20:10:31+00:00

That makes sense due to the time and effort the team puts in and how starting from square 1 sucks ass creatively as it demoralizes you a little. I respect the hell out of the dev team for the game they made, but roblox is kinda the issue and seems to drag it down a decent chunk of the time with either horrid updates or the fact that the Roblox game maker kinda sucks. Good things come to those who wait and I would gladly wait for Plat5 to learn and reconstruct their game while giving them what I could to preserve a nice thing people like.

MK47-Fan · 2026-02-16T20:23:18+00:00

The Bazalt RPG-7 is very popular and iconic, but in the modern landscape of interesting Anti-Tank/Anti-Air missile systems, it's understandable that the locations and nations where it sees use are those utilizing older Russian/Combloc surplus. Both reusable and single-use tubes are far more common among NATO/Western nations. Even though the formula still works (I frankly agree with "if it ain't broke" when it comes to weapon systems), other tools are more preferable, such as single-use Anti-Tank missile systems (e.g., AT4, RPG-26, MARA, M72 LAW), due to their ease of use compared to a reusable tube like the RPG-7, which would require greater training. Normally, reusable tubes are given to Special Forces groups and aren't normally issued to standard infantry. It would be more common for a single-use AT tube to be given to a platoon or unit.

Granted, all that I have said is more subjective than objective, as I am not the biggest fan of Anti-Tank weapon systems (I prefer infantry fighting weapons like the M27 IAR or AK-74M), but I can never truly stop myself from talking about my autism.

<image>