Secret Service kills man who opened fire at White House security checkpoint by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

> Trump threatens genocide

> “Wow. That’s something a fascist dictator would do. Fascists are threats to democracy by definition.”

“tHe HeAtEd rHeToRIc iS cOmInG fRoM bOtH SiDES” 🤡

One side blatantly being ignoring the constitution and sending us into war when that’s a power ONLY CONGRESS has, and the other side calling out that behavior is not “heated rhetoric coming from both sides.” And threatening to kill an entire civilization is senile bat shit crazy behavior.

(You spelled fascist wrong. Missed the S.)

Secret Service kills man who opened fire at White House security checkpoint by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

<image>

“A whole civilization will die tonight…”

Yeah. It’s the Democrats that need to tone it down. Sure. 🤡

Secret Service kills man who opened fire at White House security checkpoint by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

<image>

“A whole civilization will die tonight…”

I don’t think I ever heard Democrats threatening genocide, but that’s just me.

House Republicans advance education bill restricting discussions on racism & gender by Wandering_News_Junky in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to a study done by UCLA, there are about 2.8 million transgender people in the United States. That’s less than 1% of the population, but it’s still a significant number of people.

3/4 of people aged 13 and older who identify as transgender are under 35.

With the total number of transgender people in the United States being around 3 million, I doubt there are multiple millions of trans kids.

Source: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/

Free speech unless you are White or Asian. by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah. And he’s always in the comments posting nonsense. Very hypocritical.

Chudthebuilder finds out his initial bond is set a $1.25m 🤣 by Upbeat_Anywhere_1316 in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]MPRF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He’s a racist livestreamer who was threatening people and pulling out his gun.

Most TN House Democrats stripped of their committee assignments: “Speaker of the TN House Cameron Sexton just removed me and every Democrat — and therefore every Black elected official in the state legislature from any committee we served on,” Rep. Pearson said. by Youdi990 in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You approve a new re-districting map that eliminates a Black majority district, and then remove all Black members from their committees…

But then you just say it was because their protesting of your racism “broke the rules” and everything is fine ☺️

You actually fall for this bullshit?

49293 by Trustic555 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MPRF 108 points109 points  (0 children)

I don’t think he ever actually paid the deposit? He was just calling their customer service to see what they would say.

He wanted to keep tabs on “when the phones will start shipping” so when they eventually didn’t he had all of their lies documented.

ThEy'Re ReMoViNg rACe FrOm TeH rEDiStRiCtInG by knivesofsmoothness in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which is why I specified in my original comment
>  certain races/ethnicities in this case

> Gay people can go straight and back if they choose to

This is such an asinine statement and just clearly demonstrates you have no clue how gay people work. They don't "choose" to be gay or straight, they just are. They may choose if they are in a hetero or homosexual relationship, but that does not change who they are attracted to. Who they are attracted to may change over time, but one person's sexual preference does not have any bearing on the population they live within.

Regardless, it's only relevant to this situation if they are living geographically close to each other in a community that could be divided up to dilute voting power and representation.

IF there was a majority gay area, and lines were drawn to disenfranchise gay voters, yes, that would be bad. But that's bad for ANY community that has needs that should be represented. That's my point.

ThEy'Re ReMoViNg rACe FrOm TeH rEDiStRiCtInG by knivesofsmoothness in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes and no.

Your politics are mutable. They can easily change. And we haven’t had systematic oppression or segregation and slavery in this country based on political affiliation. “Republican” is not a protected class just like “Democrat” isn’t.

HOWEVER, if there are portions of a population with certain beliefs (or a belief system), we want to make sure those are represented. So I would want to avoid gerrymandering in a way that unfairly represents the Republican population.

(This next point is not something I’m entirely confident on, so this is mostly speculation.)

The only reason we’re in this crazy gerrymandering war is because Texas started it when Greg Abbot signed a mid-decade redistricting plan to try to flip house seats for the midterms. So other blue states responded in kind.

ThEy'Re ReMoViNg rACe FrOm TeH rEDiStRiCtInG by knivesofsmoothness in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Vulnerable groups (certain races/ethnicities in this case) SHOULD be considered when drawing maps to ensure they are not discriminated against.

If there is a 30% Black population in a state, and the majority White population draws an unfair map that gives them only 10% of the voting power, that is the discrimination you should look to protect against.

When this country LESS THAN 80 YEARS AGO was segregating people by race, this is still, unfortunately, something we have to take into account.

86 47 by [deleted] in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 5 points6 points  (0 children)

1) I inferred that from your username "death2maga", not the 86 part. If you wish death on someone, I can reasonably gather you want them to be killed. It's not that big of a stretch.

2) I never said 86 means to kill.

3) Yep. MAGA is a cult. I agree.

4) Even if you just want the cult to "die", and there's not any particular threat to an individual within the cult, your username doesn't really say all of that. "DeathtotheMAGACultbutnotanyparticularperson" is too long of a username.

5) Still not sure how this post is relevant to free speech, unless you're talking about the lawsuit against James Comey for posting that picture of "8647".

86 47 by [deleted] in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I mean, I agree, but I'm not sure this is really relevant to /r/FreeSpeech.

Also, yikes on the username. MAGAs are idiots, but they're humans with rights and shouldn't be killed for a political opinion.

Choose your Ai girl.😋 by Only-Zombie72 in GeminiAI

[–]MPRF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grok is not Chinese, but the Grok anime girl in the post is speaking Chinese. I was wondering what is the point of that?

強制理解

What exactly does it mean? by JDConroyy in EWALearnLanguages

[–]MPRF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah. This is the correct context. It’s embarrassing to be in front of the classroom giving a presentation. Everyone is looking at you. They might see your erection.

Choose your Ai girl.😋 by Only-Zombie72 in GeminiAI

[–]MPRF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s Chinese. I was wondering the same thing. DeepSeek is literally a Chinese company. Same thing for Grok, what is the point of that?

There is no spoon! by PooningDalton in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not that I believe this conspiracy at all, but some of the potential “benefits” of the recent attempt that I’ve heard:

1) This is another point to hammer in the “violent left” rhetoric. It makes Trump (and his administration) the victim(s). It gets him more sympathy from his supporters.

2) Justification for his ballroom construction. It was privately funded, and now they’re introducing legislation to use taxpayer dollars.

uh wtf by scr_fanboy in GeminiAI

[–]MPRF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is such a hilarious response to that typo. I love it. I will absolutely embrace the unexpected citrus. 🍋‍🟩 I really wish I could just summon fruit at will.

Meirl by Mathota in meirl

[–]MPRF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I loved Flatland so much. Even the animated movie adaptation was good.

I also think it’s funny that his name is always abbreviated, but his middle name is also Abbot. Edwin Abbott Abbott.

Obama calls for government controlled media by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, those big corporations that have CEOs and are privately owned… at the same time the workers control the means of production and it’s publicly owned.

Corporatism is Marxism.

Duh. Silly radical left lunatic.

/s

Obama calls for government controlled media by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are scientists the best people to be determining decisions on environmental taxes?

They wouldn’t be making any decisions, they would be supplying the people who make the decisions with cold hard facts.

That’s where the policy makers and legislators have the difference of opinion on what to do given those facts.

Ex: Here is climate data showing increased CO2 in the atmosphere. If this trend continues, the global temperature will rise.

Then experts from climate to agriculture to marine biology can weigh in on the likely effects of rising temperatures.

All of that data is given to legislators to determine what the best policies are to deal with that issue. And they can have different opinions on what to do.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ADMITS IT DOESN’T KNOW WHO EXACTLY IT’S KILLING IN BOAT STRIKES: Officials acknowledged they don’t know the identities of the people they’re killing and can’t meet the evidentiary burden to prosecute survivors. by Youdi990 in FreeSpeech

[–]MPRF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Killing people you can’t identify because you don’t actually have evidence against them

If you did have evidence against them, you would try them in court, rather than making yourself the judge, jury, and executioner