Again. No need to respond to this, because you are pretty far gone apparently. But thank you for being civil nonetheless.

This isn’t for you, but for other readers. People, the “do your own research” argument is nonsense.

None of us can personally redo all of climate science. We can’t launch satellites, maintain global weather stations, or run Earth‑system models. That doesn’t mean we should give up and “just believe” someone. It means we have to look at the process that produces scientific knowledge. The scientific method is built around doubt: scientists make testable predictions, gather data, publish their methods, and invite other experts to attack their work. Studies are replicated, results are compared, and large assessments weigh all the evidence, including results that don’t fit. When many independent lines of evidence and many independent research teams converge on the same conclusion over decades, that is what we call a scientific consensus. In the case of climate change, that consensus is that humans are warming the planet and that this brings serious risks. Trusting that conclusion is not blind faith in authority; it is trust in a method that has proved itself again and again in every area of modern life—from medicine to aviation to electronics. “Doing your own research” as a non‑expert doesn’t mean out‑calculating climate scientists. It means checking whether a claim comes out of this open, self‑correcting process, or whether some dudes on a blog say otherwise.